View
217
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 1
Projet QSHA –WP3
Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées
58, bd Lefebvre, 75732 Paris Cedex 15
http://www.lcpc.fr
Réunion du 23/11/2006
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 2
Réunion WP3 : ordre du jour• 10h-12h : Méthodes et évolutions envisageables
– Différences finies, Jean Virieux– Éléments finis, Evelyne Foerster– Éléments spectraux, Emmanuel Chaljub– Volumes finis, Nathalie Glinsky– Éléments de frontière (FMM), Stephanie Chaillat– Éléments discrets, Christian Mariotti– Fonctions de Green empiriques, Carine Kohrs-Sansorny– Modèles de comportement non linéaires, Fabian Bonilla
• 12h15-13h : Benchmark ESG + Sismovalp + Spice (+SCEC?) Emmanuel Chaljub, Seiji Tsuno et Jean-François Semblat
• 14h-17h : Discussion pour QSHA-WP3 :– modèles géologiques et liens avec WP1, Cécile Cornou– modèles numériques canoniques et réalistes– sensibilité aux paramètres, comparaisons
repas
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 3
Projet européen SPICE
Seismic Wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex Media:a European Network (SPICE)
one of the primary goals : Development of the earthquake motion numerical simulation methods
code validation effort in Europethrough a long-term web-interactive basis
for possible tests/comparisons/validationof numerical methods and codesfor the seismic wave propagationand earthquake motion simulation
The basis will serve even after the SPICE projectis completed and to anybody interested
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 4
Two model sets
Based on the evaluation of the SCEC code validation projectand capabilities of recent numerical-modeling methods,
two model sets were elaborated:
Wave Propagation (WP) model setand
Source Dynamics (SD) model set
Both model sets are divided into three subsets
Obviously, new models can/will be addedin correspondence
with progress in the numerical modeling methods
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 5
SPICE Subset WP I
Simplest canonical models
designed to test accuracy of the methods/codeswith respect to individual factors/features of the models:
(includes SCEC_UHS1 and SCEC_UHS2)
homogeneous elastic space : dispersion, local errorhomogeneous viscoelastic space : incorporation of attenuation2 homogeneous halfspaces : planar interface
- elastic interface - viscoelastic/pure_Q interface
homogeneous halfspace : planar free surfacehomogeneous anisotropic el. space : anisotropy
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 6
SPICE Subset WP II
Canonical modelscombining two or more basic individual factors/features:
(includes SCEC_LOH1 and SCEC_LOH3)
layer over halfspace : planar interface + free surface - elastic and viscoelastic - source inside layer / halfspace
gradient in velocity / Qrandom velocity distribution
soft inclusion in a halfspace : lateral heterogeneity
vertical layer in a halfspace : interface at the free surface
2 homogeneous halfspaces : non-planar interface
free-surface topography : traction-free condition - Gaussian hill - cliff - slope
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 7
SPICE Subset WP III
Realistic models possibly with real recordings:
(includes SC_2.1 and SC_2.2 )
Colfiorito, Central Italy : laterally bounded sedimentary basin (in cooperation with the INGV Rome, Italy)
Grenoble, France : deep Alpine valley (in cooperation with the ESG 2006 Grenoble benchmark
organizers)
other site(s)
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 8
Quantitative Misfit CriteriaEach submitted solution can be compared
with a reference solution for a given problem,and with other submitted solutions,using the quantitative misfit criteria
TFEM & TFPM, TEM & TPM, FEM & FPM,and single-valued EM & PM
misfit criteriawere developed by
Kristekova, Kristek, Moczo and Day( Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2006, #5 )
The criteria are based on
the time-frequency representation of seismograms
The time-frequency representationis obtained using the continuous wavelet transform
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 9
Interactive web interface
The interactive web interface
http://www.nuquake.eu/SPICECVal
has been developed by the SPICE teamat the Comenius University in Bratislava
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 10
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 11
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 12
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 13
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 14
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 15
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 16
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 17
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 18
The SPICE Code Validationprovides
an unprecedented opportunity in Europe(and possibly not only in Europe)
to test and compare methods and computer codesfor modeling of seismic wave propagation,
earthquake ground motion, and seismic exploration
Participants au projet SPICE favorables à échanges avec autres projets et contributions supplémentaires
à l’effort de validation (cas tests, solutions de référence…)
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 19
WP3 - Ground motion simulation
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 20
WP3-1 Methological improvements
Main goals :• main features of the various methods (table)• current or potential improvements• range of application (frequency, heterogeneity,
non linearity…)• comparisons (misfit criteria) :
– efficiency– accuracy– stability…
• very simple canonical models with well constrained features
Developments of numerical tools for wave propagation
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 21
Fiche descriptive / méthode• Type/name of method: FVTD - Finite-Volume Method in the Time Domain• Contributors (labs): N. Glinsky-Olivier (Cermics/INRIA), S. Lanteri (INRIA), M.
Benjemaa (INRIA), S. Piperno (Cermics/INRIA), J. Virieux (GeoSciences Azur),• Basic principle & improvements:
– Principles : Finite Volumes, Unstructured grids, Centered numerical fluxes, Leap-frog time-scheme, Energy conservation, Weak treatment of boundary conditions (free surface, ABC, dynamic rupture)
– Improvements : extension using Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Elements, parallel solver in development
• Features:– Source/propagation (S, P, S+P): S+P– Coupled methods: coupling with PML, poss. coupling with FETD & FDTD meth– 1D/2D/2.5D/3D : 2D (3D parallel solver under development)– Time/frequency: time-domain– Direct/iterative: direct (explicit in time)– Elements size (fraction of ): 1/12 in FVTD (less in DGTD)– Model size (nb of ): – Free-surface topography: Yes– Heterogeneity: Yes– Anisotropy: Yes (future)– Material behav. (lin., NL, eq.lin): linear– Damping (NCQ, rheol.): none (possible)– Main references
6/7 methods !!
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 22
Tableau récapitulatif méthodes
Groups FDM FEM SEM FVM BEM DEM EGF
GEOAZUR L L NL
LGIT L/(NL) NL
BRGM L L/EQ/NL
NL NL
CEA ? L/NL ?
LCPC L/EQ/NL
L/NL L NL
L=linear, EQ=equivalent linear, NL="non-linear"
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 23
Simple canonical models
• 2D/3D,• Stratification,• Amortissement,• Discrétisation, extension géométrique...• Comportement…
…• finally simple structures : canyons, basins (for
purpose of validation), cf Sismovalp
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 24
WP3-2 Sensitivity studies (P-Y Bard)
• Key parameters in modelling :– intermediate canonical models (for sensitivity analyses)– influence of topography description– sensitivity to source location, source dynamics, source
extension…– influence of soil non linearities in 2D and 3D– influence of the physical model (variability) on response
spectra (input uncertainties vs output uncertainties)
• identification of the key parameters to be measured
• finally, empirical description of the physical effects from theoretical results(e.g. 2D/3D aggravation factor...)
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 25
WP3-2 Sensitivity studies (P-Y Bard)
(Nearly) realistic models :• Nice (WP1 : test de rugosité d’interface…)• Grenoble• Algiers• Naples…
…cf WP3-3 & WP3-4
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 26
WP3-3-WP3-4 Benchmarking (E.Chajlub/E.Foerster)
• Validation of developed codes based on international benchmark but not tied to ESG2006 with two geometries (Basins and margins)
• Fully realistic models...
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 27
WP3-5 Statistical comparison(Hideo Aochi)
• Variability of simulations using intensive simulations...
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 28
WP 3-6 Lessons (J.Virieux)
• ????
QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/2006 29
WP 3-X ...
2006-1 2006-2 2007-1 2007-2 2008-1 2008-2
Who
What
Deli.
Who
What
Deli.
Who
What
Deli.
Who
What
Deli.
Who
What
Deli.
Who
What
Deli.
Planning et échéancier !
Prochaine réunion ?
Recommended