5
Introduction Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib Bourguiba, Sfax, Tunisie RÉSUMÉ. Mots-clés SUMMARY. Electrical burns are a major cause of bodily harm due to the mechanism and effect of the lesions. This prompts us to study these lesions and their management in order to reduce the morbidity caused by this type of accident. We conducted a retrospective descriptive observational study of patients hospitalized for electrical burns. This study includes 23 patients. The average age was 25.74 years. The most common occurrence was a domestic accident in 13 cases (56.5%), a work accident in 8 cases (34.8%), and a road traffic accident in 2 cases (8.7%). Fasciotomy was performed on six patients: five had high voltage injuries. Necrosis excision was performed at 8.26 days ± 5.55 days. Seven amputations were performed including 6 at the upper limb. Twenty flaps were used on 12 patients. Locoregional flaps were performed for 15 zones, and distant flaps as a solution in the event of locoregional flap failure. Five cases had immediate reconstruction because of exposure of noble elements, 3 showing necrosis of the flap. The average healing time was 45 days. Seven patients who underwent a reconstruction by flap healed after this period. The main results of the study show that conventional emergency decompression does not appear to reduce the amputation rate, the use of local and locoregional flaps in the initial phase (<21 days) carries a significant risk of suffering and necrosis, and that antithrombotic prevention or the use of flaps does not seem to have an impact on healing delays. Keywords: burns, electrical, fasciotomy, antithrombotic treatment, flap, healing time Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018

Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. · Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. · Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib

Introduction

Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K.

Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib Bourguiba, Sfax, Tunisie

RÉSUMÉ.

Mots-clés

SUMMARY. Electrical burns are a major cause of bodily harm due to the mechanism and effect of the lesions. This prompts us to studythese lesions and their management in order to reduce the morbidity caused by this type of accident. We conducted a retrospective descriptiveobservational study of patients hospitalized for electrical burns. This study includes 23 patients. The average age was 25.74 years. Themost common occurrence was a domestic accident in 13 cases (56.5%), a work accident in 8 cases (34.8%), and a road traffic accident in2 cases (8.7%). Fasciotomy was performed on six patients: five had high voltage injuries. Necrosis excision was performed at 8.26 days ±5.55 days. Seven amputations were performed including 6 at the upper limb. Twenty flaps were used on 12 patients. Locoregional flapswere performed for 15 zones, and distant flaps as a solution in the event of locoregional flap failure. Five cases had immediate reconstructionbecause of exposure of noble elements, 3 showing necrosis of the flap. The average healing time was 45 days. Seven patients who underwenta reconstruction by flap healed after this period. The main results of the study show that conventional emergency decompression does notappear to reduce the amputation rate, the use of local and locoregional flaps in the initial phase (<21 days) carries a significant risk ofsuffering and necrosis, and that antithrombotic prevention or the use of flaps does not seem to have an impact on healing delays.

Keywords: burns, electrical, fasciotomy, antithrombotic treatment, flap, healing time

Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018

Page 2: Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. · Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib

Fig.1

Tableau II

Tableau III

Circonstance Voltage Total

Accident domestiqueAccident de travail Accident de la routeTotal

Patient et méthodes

Résultats

Ta-bleau I

Tableau I

Fig. 1

Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018

Page 3: Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. · Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib

Discussion

.

.

Date de l’excision (jours) Type de Lambeau Date (jour) Évolution Lambeaux/patient5

301056

277

85

69

Tableau II

Voltage Le Traitement A-T* Délai de cicatrisation (jour) Test exact de Fisher(p<0.05)

BasHautTotal

Tableau III

Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018

Page 4: Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. · Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib

Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018

Page 5: Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. · Ghorbel I., Abid A., Moalla S., Karra A., Ennouri K. Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Réparatrice et Esthétique, CHU Habib

Conclusion

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Conflit d’intérêt.

Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters - vol. XXXI - n. 2 - June 2018