Gustavo Soto Enriquez, A087 274 650 (BIA Aug. 5, 2015)

8/20/2019 Gustavo Soto Enriquez, A087 274 650 (BIA Aug. 5, 2015)

1/13

Antonetti, Alina Alia Antonetti Atttorney at Law817 Almeria AvenueREAR APTCora Gables F 33134

Name: SOO-ENRIQUEZ GSTAVO

US. Department of Justice

Executive Oce Immigration Reew

Board ofImmigration ApealsOce of th Crk

5107 Lee sburg Pik, Sute 200Fals Chc Vgn 2204

DHS/ICE Oice of hie Counse POP.OBox 2515Phoenix AZ 85002

A 087274650

Date o t h is notice / 5 /2015

cosed is a copy of te Boad's decisi ad ode i the above-reeced case.

Encosue

Panel Membes:uly, RogrGrr A Co rici A.

Sinceely,

DO caDoa CaChie Cerk

Uetea Dock

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index/

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e

n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t

Cite as: Gustavo Soto Enriquez, A087 274 650 (BIA Aug. 5, 2015)


2/13

Decision f e Bard Imtin Appls

F Curh Vignia 2053

Fe A087 274 650 Pox,A Dte: AUG 5 201

e GUSTA VO SOTO IQUEZ

MOVA PROCEEDS

APPEA

ON BHALF F ESPONDN: Ai Atonet, su

RE:

otic: ec 22()(6)(A)(), & Act [8 USC § 82()(6)(A)()]

Pn wout beg ded o poed (wr)

odged: S 237()()(B), & Act [8 USC § 22() ){ B) -n Uted Ste in oton of w

APPLICAIO Adjsmt of Ss; w of nsb

e esponden, d czen of Mexico, es e o udges M 9

204, dcison, ndig eoe, dg s ppcton usen of sts deseon 245() of e Iion d Ntony Act, 8 USC § 1255(), d tngot de e D of Hoed Secty no onded eepoens ppe w be ssi, d e eod w be eded updted bckodd secy cecks

e Bod ews ngs of fc d e cy oeou" sdd 8 CFR§00(d))i) Mater of S-H, 23 & Dec 462, 46465 (B 2002) Te Bo

evew uesion of w, dson, d udn d o ssues n pes om dcsosof Ion Judges de novo 8 CF R § 10031(d)(3)(i) Becuse e con w e My , 2005, t s ujec to e visos of e A ID Ac of 2005

esponden cocedes t e i emobe y e of s w pec in e Uted Stes (J t 2 T 20) e espondt equted te eef of duent of sto e e en Re le n hi e s dSes ctz ouse.

Feby 2003, e espodet ws concted, prut o gty pe, 1991 oeof poseso of acotc gs (Ex 2, Tb D) Fo oe, te espondt was senced

to 2 ys pbo o, e d fees (id.) In be 206, t Supio Co ofAzon, Mcop Coty, e aide e onden's 200 uden of gt psu oARIZON EVSD TTUES NOD § 3907 xh 3)

I m m i g r a n t & R e

f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e

n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r

a c . n e t



3/13

087 274 65

e Iiion Judg deeind h th resondent's 199 convton l win thFederl Frst Oender Act FFOA) proecing h rsonden gst the dvers mmgrtionconsequencs o onetie s drg ossesson. See Lujan-Armendariz IN, 222 F3d 728

(9h r. 200) holdng t der drg convcons exunged nder th FOA, 18 US.C.§ 367, o b used fr ion uroses and no rtionl bsis exiss fr denyng reli oidncly siuted ins who u fr siilr een nder ste exungeen ws), overrule by unez-Reyes . Hoer 66 F.3d 684 69 9 r 20) (hoding ony lis rosectively)

Uon or d novo rvw, w disee wt he Iigron Judgs denil o djustent oss r o dscron Befr djusen o stus y b grted n lict brs he buden o deonstrng th h ris rei s r o dscreion. ee Maer of ra,13 I&N Dec 494 496 BIA 1970); Mater of Ba &N Dc. 626 BIA 974; A.. 1976).he extrordinry dscronr relie o djsen "c ony be nted n eioroscses t 630. Generlly, e existence o vorble cors such s mly tes hds,leng o residnce n the Unies Ses ec. will be considerd s coterviling corsmrting vorbl exercis o dnsrive discrton. Maer of ra supra 496.However whre dverse cors are resen, y be ncss r len to resent evdenceo unusul or even ostndng qties o ouweigh he negve ctors

The Imigrtion Judg consdrd e resondn's vorble cors inclding hisrsidence in e Unted Ss snce 1988 d s ily tes incldng his Ued Stes cizenwi nd chid (I.J. 78). he Igrtion Judg so consider vorble ctor hresondents supo o hs whle she colees hcy school (I.J. ).

he Iition Jdge sed is dn o djsent s ter o dscretion soey on hs

concusion tht h rsondent ckd credbil becuse his sony conicd wih 203 re-senence nvestigon regarding s 1991 oens red by robtion ocer fr hes criinl co ndicting tht n 1991 d y 1992 he sod cocn o n ndrcover olc ocer .J. t 7-8 r. t 39, 4550 E 2 b E). We nqr y e hd ino ecircumstcs srodg h coission o he crm n ordr to drn er vorbe exercse o discretion s wrranted it s iissibl to go ben rcord oconvcon to rssss n lien's ultte ut or nnocnc Matter of oberts 20 I&ND 294 31 BIA 99) Jus w wl not g hnd rcord o conviction o dene eguit or nocenc o en so we re hsin o gve substtil weght to resenenceinvsgon reped more thn 1 yers er h even bsent convicion r the ceegd or coroborg vdence o he llegtion conined tren. See Mater of rregun

21 &N Dc 38 42 (BIA 995) (dcnng o give sbsti weigt to an est reo, n ebsence o convicon or cooborting evdece, in consdering exrcise o discretion)Her e lic concded h he hd comtd cr d d restituton most 25 earsg e e e te, e ws nble to se Englsh d, rre w bl tocomncte th t polc ocr Tr. 41) Moreovr, even ssing he sold cocne sssred in e rsentence reo, s estiony is ndisud tht he h h no dverse contct

2

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e

n t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a c . n e t



4/13

A087 274 650

aw ercemet, to icude a rac ticket, sice that tme (Tr. at 50, 53) 1 Uder thesecircumsces, we cocude that the resoet mets adjustmet of status i discretio, ad wew remad he record r the reqred backgrou d securty updates

ODER: T respodet's appea is sutaied

FRTHER ORDER Pursuat to 8 CFR. § 1003l (d)(6), the record is remaded to theImmiatio Judge r the urpose of aowng the DHS the ooun to compete or udateidetiy, aw ercemet, or securty ivetigations or examiatios, d rer roceedngs, ifecesar, a r e ery of a order as provide by 8 CFR § 003 47(h)

FR HE BOAD <

I We observe hat e DHS did ot oose a at of reief (r. at 55).

3

p p



5/13

SS R F SV F FR GR VW

GR R S R S

X RZ

R F

S-QZ G

R

))))))

RV RS

F --

"A1 .

RG eco 23)()B) o te gion d Noy Ac edsson s noniga ude ()) o Ac e spoeee he nd s e ong n eed n vioono Ac o y ot w o he ne s

Adjusm o us u sco 245() of te Acoury Depe de secon 24B(b) o e Ac

Ri C Buos sqBueos Lw Oces Ic686 No 27 AvenuePoex Ao 817

G:C KppAssis Ce CounseDepen o Ho cuy23 No ent AvenuePoex Aon 84

S RR F GR R

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

O nu 209 e Dep o Hoen cuy ("DH) ssued oce oApp (TA) gs e sponen cgg s ovbe pusun o secio22()6)(A)() o e io oly Ac (A o e Ac), s eded s pse i e U es ou eing e o po o wo s v h

Und es y e o pce oe sg y oey ne. [Ex. .] suppo o is cg H ge spon ) s o c o no o e Ue ts; 2) s n ciz o Mexco () ned e U es o e Po exs o o ou ugus 2 188 (4) ws no e o po speco by gon Oce (Id]

se cd poceedngs ed o Juy 22 29 e espode og cosee lgons (1) ough (3) n TA e egon (4) a ie te cg o

4 .




a c . n e t


6/13

EQEZA087-27465

rmovabi psa to scon 22a) 6))) of e c he rsponn, oh cosl,sna Mxico as te conr of rmoval h rsponen, oh consl, nca ta he

lel ntre th Unid Sats n 1988 w a o I-94, rrvalDpe Record, bt hrsponn was avn ic locan t ocnt he rspondn, og consl, alsoinicat a wol b sekn he rlf of asten of sas ner scion 245(a) of ec pon obainin proof of leal entr Alteaivl, the responent, oh cosl, indicaetat wol b sekin rlif in th rm of ccellation of rmovl or volnry eprreTe Co rs proceins o allow rsponden im to locae s I-94

On Marc 24, 2010, e rsponen, roh consel, indcae at h wishe oschel nivial har o monstra h responen's ligiili r cncellation ofrmovl, as h respondn was still havn ic locatn his 94 t s hering, DHS lsoinicat ta te respondent ad a crina hisory hat col ac his eliiilit r reli

DHS sumite t respond's crin rcors on J 9, 2010 [x 2] respondn never smted an application r cncellation of rmoval Insa, at e

nividal hrn on Novmr 4, 2013, th rsponden, trogh consel, sbmid a Form 485, pplicaion o Reister Prmanen Rsince or djst Stas, which ncl vnc ofa lg ntr no Unite Saes on Ocobr 1, 988 x 5] Basd on he videnc of a llen, DH sbmi a Form I-261, ditional Chres of Inamissiliyeporaili, in liof NT [x ] In Fo 1-26, DHS loge amend chge aainst ersponen, chrgin him as removal prsn o scion 237a) )B) of the c, as amend,in ha ar amsson as a nonnt nr sction 10(a)(5) of e c, te rspondnrmne in h Unte Ss r a tme lonr hn pei, in violaton of the c or n

or law of he Unit Sas [Id] In sppor of is char, DHS llee ha th rspondent:) was amit o he Unit States a a o place on or ao ust 27, 988, as aorder crosser or noniign visior a a Mxic order po of en r a mporry prono o exced svn-wo hors to visi in th ra wiin et-ve ils of Unite Staesorder wi Mxico 2) was nconr on or aot Decemr 16, 2008, at Phoenix, Aizona, adistce or th wnve mils om h Unie Stas border with Mxico; nd 3) hs norecivd the peissio of iraion ocr to procd eod tha wentve mil lior sevnt-o-hor priod rsponn amite thse alleaions conceed he cg

prsat o 237a)( )(B) of t ct.

Th rspondn tesid n sppor of is a plcations r rlief at nivil hing

l on Novbr 4, 2013, bere hs Cor nur of ocnts relatin o hresponnts cse have een enered nto recor as lows the N, issed on Jay 5,2009 [x 1 ; a Fo I-261, ion hs of nadssl/Dporali, smit on Novmr 4, 2013 x ; DSs Sisson of vidnce, sbite on 9, 2010 x. 2,

I The respondent teste thrugh an nerpreter n he Spaish language r he majrity of hs tesiony. However,e responent cose o nsh hs testmoy n he Engsh anguage as he as speaks Engis enty an washang cy wang r the intereter o copete her intepreatons bere he cu respond

2

I m m i g r a n t & R e f u g e e A p p e l l a t e C e n

t e r , L L C| w w w . i r a

c . n e t


7/13

TNQZ·

b AE]; Jmet o G St e bmte o 20 E ] eot'og omt e 5 20 [Ex 4] o -85 Aco to

Regtr Pemet Reence jt St wth ng oet Form 60Acto r Wve of Gro o mb td on Ote 29 201 [x. 5b AE

I. STAEMEN OF THE LAW

A. Credibilt

A t m tem wee l met t tttry te ry t r o re h or he m rqt th C t h eeto

regarg t rey eve u b te t' emy. A §20()()(B). n er ton r re emo o r e heMy 1 2005 ee o he AL ID At o 2005 PL. 109-3, 9 Stt. 23("EAL ID At th ety detmon go by te AL D t rvoregrg rely e A vde th te rby we ee theowg mer:

Cerg e tty o e te d reet tor temmgrto g my be crebty det te emor coror reoe o th p or t th t y o thecn' r we cont e cncy ee te ct' orwn wre or tem (evr me wehr r ot deroth oerg he ct r wh e emen wee me)the te cotecy o h ch sttemet t coneny of httmet wh othr vee rcor (cg et o h Dmto St o cotry ot) y cure r ho eme wht rgard o eter eny, ic or ehoogoe o the ear o h ct' c r y tr reen

A § 20(c)((C).

Reevt tor a to t' er ne r r ex wy wt t or t roue otn min r o eeh. SeeArulampaam v. Ashcof, 33 F 67 8 ( Cr 2003) n to wng torm or n vere re nng ' b t ctyete teoy Unakhaul v Gnzaes F 3 93 9 Cr 205 hog t to roy core t "mgr ncc" etmo) evavetetmy Wang v INS 352 .3 1250 25 (9 Cr 2003) ttmony tt is meDon . Gnale, 416 F3 8 7 9th C 200)

Unr te REAL D Ac v r ctene re crty3


8/13

�/

OOENRQUEZ·A087-274-650

'(

dig Jibril v. Goales, 423 F3d 1129, 1138 1 (9 Cir 200) For puoses of a adversecredibiy deemiaio he appica ms be given an oppouiy o expain or dey y

discrepancies or iosiseies, ad e Cou ms cosidr he applicas rasoable adplausible expaaios Chen v Ashcro, 362 F.3d 611, 618 9h Cir. 2004); Sing v Gonzales,439 F.3d 1100 10 9h Cir 2006); Kar v Ashcro 379 F.3d 876, 887 (9h Cir. 2004).

e appia's esmo aoe ma be suiet o susa is or her burde of proofwho corroboratio "f i is demostaby redib prsuasiv, ad probave of ssucien o support he applias laim Maer f-Y--, 24 & Dec. 260 263 BA 2007)f h applica's esimoy is und o be credible he Co il eigh e esimoy h oervde i he reord A § 240(c )( 4){B) Hoever if e Cou deeres ha oroboraiveevidee should be produd, i "ms be provided uless he applic does o have hevidce d cao reasoabl obai he evidee Id ; see as Sing v Hoder 649 F3d

1161 1173 (9h Cir. 2011) oig ha e ilure o produe readily availabe evidee maysuppo a advers credibiliy deemaio uder he AL D Ac credibili lagagesupersedig previous ih Crcui ase a) Unuakhauu, 416 F.3d a 938 odig ha aapplica may be d o credible "here h J has reaso o quesio he applicsredibiliy ad e applia ils o produce o-dupicaiv, maeral easy availableooboraig evidece ad provides o credible explaaio r suc lue) (ineaquoaios omd) Ths, a appic r reif should provide videiary suppo r"maeria cs whic ae cera o his or er m ad easil subje o vericaio Mater o-Y--, 24 & Dec. a 263 quog Maer -, 21 I& Dec. 722 7226 BA 1997))he ilre o produce su reasoabl avaabe ooboratg evidece c lead o a digha he appia has ied to mee his or her brde of proo d

B. Adjustment o Status uer Sectio 245(a) o the Act

Sio 24a) of the A provides r he adjusmet of sas of ie who asispected ad admid or paoled io he ied Saes o a disriory basis, i: 1) h aliemakes appicaio r adjusmen 2) a imigran visa is iediae avaabe o th aiea he ime his or her appiaio is led; ad 3) he aie is eigibe o reive an iigra visaad is admssible r perme residee. A § 24(a). f he aie has no bee "ispeed adadmied or paroed ito e ed Saes, h alie is o egibe r adjusme of saus uder24(a) ess he or se qies r he special provisios uder he Viole Agais WomAc ("A WA. Id

deeiig heer a vorabe exercise of discreo is wed i ganngadjse of sas, cours ill ook o a mber of qiabl cos. Such ors "icl ba o limid o e existece of mily ies i he id Staes; h g of he respodnsresidee i he ied Saes; he dship of avelig abroad ad he respodesiigraio hisory, cludig any preoeived ie o imme a he ime of eerg as aommi Maer of Hasm 24 & Dec. 785 793 (BIA 2009) ieal ciaiosomied). Addiioa a crima hisor lak hreois relevan o he exercise of

4

I i g a & e u g e e A p p e a e C e

e , C

i a

e


9/13

OO-QUZ·A087-274-650.

dscreo Id Geerlly, who he presece of relev dverse cors, screo wllordrly vor r duse o ss ater of Mendez-orlez, 2 I&N Dec 296, 3

B 996)

C. Vounta Departure

ecio 24B o he c provdes h, t e coclso o reovl proceedgs, cory pet ie o volrly depr he ed Ses, the lie's own expese, ele: ) hs ee physclly prese e ed Ses r period of t les oe yermedely precedg serce o e oce o ppe (2) s d hs een person of goodorl chcer r t les ve yers (3) s o deporle uner § 237()(2))) (s nggrved lo) or 237()(4) (on secriy or reled onds); nd (4) hs eslishe y clerd covcg evdece he or she h e es o dep e ied Ses d neds o

do so der 8 CFR § 24026c)(2), cler nd covcg evdece o he es o depshl clde ll cses preseo y he lie o psspor or oer rvel docueosce o ssre lwl ey o he co o whch he le s deprg lenpeed o dep volly s pos volry depe od o ecessry oese h he lie wl depr" § 24B(b)3)

ANL VSIS

Credibility

Te respoe ed s djse of sts pplcon o Noveer 4, 2 3; herere,hs c s goveed y he REL D c See REAL D c sg h he D cppes o reqess r rele led on or er e My 1, 205 de o ece)

der he RE D c credlity sdrd, he Cour ds h e respode hs oprovided credile esoy The respode prvde cosse esony regrdng hspcpo he sle o drus Dug drec exto, te respode repeedly sedh he never sold dgs d, ore speccally, th he ever sold drs o polce ocer Therespoe lso ly cled h oly hs ed Jose oBel Beltr) sold dgsHowever, dr crossexio e respode ded h he ced s te ddle ewee Bel d dercover polce ocer who ws cg s uyer. lhogh e

respode s lly evsve whe qesoed rerdg he eves dscssed hsPreseece vesgo, he lely ded h he hd, c sold coce o dercover ocer o Noveer 27, 99 Deceer 3, 1, d uy 7, 992

Moreover, he or ds plsle te respoet ever receved y oeyr helpg Belr sell dgs, s he cls rherore, sch cls re drecly cordcey e record The respoe esed h e ever eeed or expeced o ee oelyo helpg Belr; rer, e respode cls h he only ced s ddle drn

5



c . n e t


10/13

QUZ 77

ers ug tsacios ecause h id er a ed o hp hi ou. e resodehr ese a e ever o anoe a he raso he as hepg era as o eexra ico ecaus as org a Paa xprss so chai, a ha do e e exa o. Hoer, he Presec vesgo coacs he rsoe's eso [ee x 2, a . The Presec Ivesigaio saes ha upo qusoig, heresponde o a poce ocer th h goig o receiv $00 o oe of e drug

rsacos ha he ws hepig Bea s he ugs o ae ex one. [Id] Fuere respode aer ese ha he as o eg uh oe a Pn xpess, ch is he cou o rd o pay a aoe o onu orkg o s cina case i 19 Theo ds he irio coae i e reseece Ivesigo o e ore redie a

e respoe s sseo ha s a eee-y-od ma w opig ob heexpeed ohg n r r helg Bera s drugs or Beras edship. See

Chebcoub v. IN 25 Fd 103 044 9 200) hoig ha eso s"ipausie n igt of bakoud evece ca suppo a aderse rei g)arogae by saue o other n a tated hresha v Holde, 50 d 104 046 ir 2010 ee also Jibr v. Gonzale, 42 3d 2 135 ( ir. 2005 "houghsecuaio ad oeure oe co sus a adverse ed dg J beaoed o exercse coo sese rejecg a peiioers eso eve i he o

poi o specc coar eiee he record o ree .

he o s he respoes eso acke he requis g o u o idu o he inconsise pause smo discussed above ee Kar v Goae 83 06, 06 (h r 200) (iea uoaios oie cordig he ou d a

he respode has ot povied redibe sion , erere eers a averse creidig.

Secio 245() of he provdes r e ause of ss of an respoe speeda aie or paold o he ie Sas i e espode: 1) has ae apiio raduse 2) ia visa is iee vae o the respoe (3 e respodehas deosraed egiil o receiv ha visa d aiss r peae resde; (4 he respoe a vorae xercse of isreio

R

he rsoe ha ade appio duse of sats, a gran vsas meiae aae o i as h sos o a d es ciz. Ex , as AB. herespoe h aso proi proof o a ega er 8 Ex , a C

ough he respod pe gu o Possesso o Noic Dugs 2003 [Ex 2], sudge of gu as se aside o Sepeer 22, 200 [x. . Trere, he Fedra FrsOeder A appies proecn he respoe agais averse igao cosequeces

;a c




a c . n e t


11/13

SOTO-ENRQUZ·A087274-650

becse is s-e sple possessio rg oese ws exped See LujanArmendariz v.INS 222 d 72 (9 2000, overuled by unezReyes v. Hoer 646 F3d 684 (9t r.

2011 (holig eql poeco d o requre reig expged se cocios of dgcies e me s eel g cocos t d ee expuge ue e Feel FrsOede ) log e Nih Cci hel i uez-Rees eel Fis Oeder Acpoecos o o eed o s-ie sple ug possesso oeses expged ude steeblv stue, rule pples oly pospecely NuneRee 646 F.3 690-94Theee becuse he rspode's se expgee occe 2006, ve yes ee eNuez-Re oli s Possesso o Ncoc rgs oese oes no cout gs hi s coico r dssbily prposes

Tus e esoe s soly elgile jsmen of sus e seo 45(of e Ac e oly reig issue is whee e wats voble execse of dsceo

2. Discretion

Adte o sus er seco 245( o e Ac s discetiory r of eleatte ofaah 5 Dec 127, 34 (BIA 00. I king seoy eeios, eCor weh e vole an dese sceoy cos to ee wether, o blce, eol o th eece dices e respode ts vorle exercise o dscetoMate oJe, 3 & Dec 3, 383 (AG 2002.

Cosdetios t y sppo orle eercse o discreo by e Cou icle,u e not le o, eiece o log-e esdece, youg ge e, ohe aly es

he Ue te, serce e ed tes rme rces, evdee of vle d sece o heco eidece of ny geie poscoico eblto, ad so ofeploye, popey, o sess es wih e ite es. C-V-T, 22 &N Dec 11 Negie coserios iclude evece of respode s ccer o esibty s pee esden o e Ue Stes, cludn the e uderlyig crcusces ofhe os of issility o eoblty e sse, e pesece of tolsc igo oltios, e e, ececy, ad seiosness o respoe'scl recod Id

Fs, e lookig e ege cors pese the resoes case he Co hs t e espoe d o povie credible esoy e espode as ot eeig w e Cou regdig is iolvee i e sle of coce Alog herespodes es ocue oe wey yes go, 1991, te espode coes o eyclpblit his cos Te respoe eses o i e expece o eceie oey nechage r epig is ie sell ugs, d e plces ll of e ble is skes oBela

e posiie cos i e espode s cse ncle he espode s log-ie resece is con d s lil es o he Ue es, cld e Ses cize wife



c . n e t


12/13

SOTOENRQUEZA7-274650

nd hild. The Cou an so asse h he responden provides suppor o is wfe wheher ie eoional or anil whle she is opleing phray sool.

However when weiging he vorle d adverse ors in e responden's se eCor anno nd h he warrans a vorable exerise o disreion The a e responedid no provide redie esiony is lge or weighing gins exerise of disreion inhis or Moreover he responden's inbiliy o e responsiili r his ps mises eshi ndesirble s peanen esiden o e Uned Ses. Ths he Cour nds eresponden has iled o eslish h he es relief in e Cour s disreion. Mater of C-VT,22 I&N e. 2. The Cour wll herere deny he responden s ppliion r djsmeno sus der seio 245() of e s aer o disreion.

C. Volunta Departure

e Cou nds e responden is eligile r he relief o volny depe underseion 240B of e . He ws pysilly presen in he Uied Ses r over oe yeapreeding serie o his noie o ppear on Jnu 5 200 e is nd as een person o goodmorl rer r e ps ve yers he is not deporle under seions 237(a)(2)()(iii) or237()(4) o he , d he has esalished by lear nd ovining evidene h he has heeans o dep he Unied aes d inends o do so To ep volun depure heresponden mus le $750 ond wi H's ICE Field Oe Direor wihin ve 5) siessdys o he dae of hs orer nd s dep e Uned Ses wihin sixy (60) dys ohe de o is order.

NOTICE The respondens ilure o pos e required voluny depre ond wihn he iereqired does no erinae he responden's oligion o dep ihin he peod llowed ordoes i exemp he responden o e onsequenes of iling o depr voluarly ding eperiod loe 8 C.FR. § 240.26()(4). If e responen ils o dep he Uned Ses inordane w hese odiions he responden wll e suje o ivil penly o 5000 andshall be ineligile r peiod of en (0) yers o reeive ny her relief under seions20 240B 245 28 nd 249 o e . See INA § 240B(d); 8 C.F.R. § 120.26). Theresponen y choose o deline he Cours gran of voluny depure if he responden isnwilling o aep he oun of he bond or he oher ondiions. 8 C.FR. § 120.26()(3).

WAIG ol e responden oose o e an ppel of his Co's order wih he Bord

o Imigraion Appels e responden ms wihin hiy (30) days of ling n ppel wih heBoard sumi suien proo o hving posed he reqired voluary depe bond 8 CF.R.§ 1240.26()(3)(i If e responden does no provide imely proo o he Bor ha he reuirevouny depre od as een posed wih DHS he Bod ill no reinse e perod ovolnay depre in is nl order. Id.

WG: If he responden es wih his Cour pos-deision oion o reopen orreonsider durg e period lowed r volnry deparue e gr of volunry depe

8

p p

,


13/13

,

SOTOENRIQUEZ�77-6

wll be automatically terminated, and e alteate order of remova w ll take eect immedately.8 C. § 12402((3(i) e penates r ilure to depar vountari under seco

240(d) of the Act will not appy if te respondent has ed a postdecsion motio to reopen orreconsider drng the perod allowd r voluntary deparure. Id

IV CONLUSIO

he Court ds hat te respondent s not egible r adjusment of satus der secon245(a o te Act as a mater of discreton. he Court addtonaly nds tht te respondent seigble r volunar depaure under secton 240 of e Act and concudes ta e metsvounary deparure as a matter of discretion

Accordingly te llowing orders shall be entered:ORDERS IT IS OED TT te responden' s appicatio r Adutment of

tatus pursuan o section 245(a) of the Act s DENIED

Date

T IS FNLLY ORDERED TT he respondent be ante theprvilege to vontary depar the nted tates wn sxy (0 dasom the date of this order. e resondnt s requred to le a $50 bondwith the pamen of Homeld ecrt win ve (5) business daysom the dae of this order hould the responde l to leave andwen ordered ths order sall auomatcal bcome a order of removl

om e nted tates to Meco upon the charge contaned n te Aurtermore, e respondent will be suect o cvl pena of $5000and shall be igble, r a period of te ( 0) ears to receve an rrelief under sectons 240A 240 245 248 and 249 of te Act

Wen

US. Immigrtion JudgeERTIFITE OF SEVIE _/SEE BY Mail sona erice (P)TO H [ ] A 1 ·,:D-. Aliens oeDTE (Court a

9

g g p p

,

Documents

Gustavo Soto Enriquez, A087 274 650 (BIA Aug. 5, 2015)