Luis Rueda-Perez, A098 241 147 (BIA Nov. 17, 2011)

8/13/2019 Luis Rueda-Perez, A098 241 147 (BIA Nov. 17, 2011)

1/8

RE DER N CHOLAS APAIR PROJEC254 FRIEND S REE 5 H FLOOR

OS ON MA 02114

Name R EDA PEREZ, L S

E c iv O c r mmigr ion R v

Board ofmmigration Appealsce of the C erk

5 07leesbu Pik , Suite 000Fa Church Vi gin a 0

HS/IC O ce of Ch ef Counse OSP.O. ox 8728

oston, MA 02114

A098-241-147

Date of th s not ce 11/17/2011

Enc os d is copy of o rd s d cision nd ord r in bov r r nc d c s

c os r

M mb rsM p s G rry

Gy r

S nc r y

o n C rrC C rk

Cite as: Luis Rueda-Perez, A098 241 147 (BIA Nov. 17, 2011)


2/8

RUEDA PEREZ, LUIS ( 098 24 47)20 BRADSTON STREETBOSTON MA 02 8

Name: UEDA P R Z, LUIS

c v O c mm g on R vi

Board of mmigra io ppealsce of he Clerk

5 07lees u g P ke Su e 2000Fa s C u . 1 a 0

HS/ CE O ice of Chief Counsel BOSP.O Box 8728Boston, MA 02 4

A098 24 47

Date of his no ice / 7 20

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision in the above-re ere ced case. This copy is beingprovided to you as a courtesy. Your attorney or represe tative has bee se ed w th thisdec sio pursua t to 8 C.F.R. 1292.5(a) f the a tached dec s o orders that you be removed rom the U ited States or a f rms an Imm gration Judge s decis o order g that you beremoved, a y petitio f r rev ew of the attached decisio must be i ed with a d received by theappropr ate cou o appea s w th days of the date o the decis o

nc os

n M m sM p s G y M n H GP y Rog r

D c f

onn C rC C k



3/8

U S Department of JusticeExecut ve O ce r Imigat on Rev ew

Dec s on of the Board o gat on Appeals

Falls Ch rch, irgin a 04

Fi : A098 241 47 Bos on,M

n r LU S RUEDAPEREZ a a L is R da MOVAL PROCEED N S

APPEAL AND MOT O

Da :

ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT Ni ho as A R id r, Esq ir

CHAR E:

NOV 17 20

No i S .237(a)(2)(A)(iii), &N A [8 U S C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii)] -Convi of a rava ony as n d by 10 (a)(43)(

APPL CA ON T nina ion

Th r spond n , a a p an n r sid n an na iv an i iz n of M xi o, app am i ra ion d 's n , 201 , d ision ord rin im r mov d. D pa m n of Hom

S ri y has no d a bri f on app a Th app a i b s s ain and h r orr mand d

W r vi ndin s of , in din h d ina ion of r ibi i y, nd r a ar y rrs andard 8 C F R. 1003 (d)(3)(i). r vi q s ions of a , in din h r av m h r van b rd n of proof, and iss s of dis r ion nd r ade no s an ard 8 C F.R

003 (d)(3)(ii)

On Mar h 7, 2010, h r spond n p d i y o simp assa , a mis m anor n vio N Hamps ir a (R spond n s p a a r m n , do n mb r 276784) N.Hv S A 63 :2-a. For his onvi ion, h r spond n as s n n d o 12 mon hs in ar ra ion11 mon hs s sp nd d, and 2 y a s of ood b havior (R spon n 's p a a m n ). Bas d on

onvi ion, h D par m n of Hom and S r y omm n r mova pro din s by isa No i o App ar, har in i as r movab n r s ion 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of h A , 8 U 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), r avin b n onvi d of an a rava d ony rim ofvio n in vio a ionof s ionI (a)(43)(F) of h A , 8 U S C 1 0 (a)(43)(F) Th r spon n ni d r movan d a mo ion o r ina pro din s, ar in ha is onvi ion did no ons i

f v o n nd 8 . 6(a mmi ra ion d d ni d mo ion o

1 Th mmi ra ion orr y nd a h r spon n s isd m anor o nsons i a rim of vio n nd r 18 U S 6(b), i h is imi d o ony o ns s Th

r spond n s o ns is p is ab by a maxim m of imprison n ofy ar See N.HS 631 2 a( ) As s h, i is a so a mis m anor nd r f d ra aSee18 U.S C 3559(a)(5)( assi in oni s as o ns s p nishab by a of imprison n of mor han on y a



4/8

0 241 47

s e responden did no pply r ny r s o re ie , ordered i re oved. e responden nowp e s o is decision.

e responden r ues e i r ion Jud e inco rec ly pplied e irs Cirdecisions in United States Nason 26 F.3d 0 (1s Cir. 2001), ndUnited States v Boo r644 .3d 12, 17- 8 (1s Cir. 201), in de er inin is convic ion r si ple ss u i New H ps ire is cri e o violence, s ose c ses re in pplic b e i e con e o U l 6( ). e responden er r es e I i r ion Jud e s ou d ve pplied con ro in preceden , n e y, is o rd's decision inMatter of Velasquez 2 I&N Dec. 278 (BIA2010), w ic dop ed e ni ed S es Supreme Co r s re sonin inJohnson United State130 S C . 126 (20 0).

Sec ion 237( )(2)(A)(iii) o e I i r ion nd N ion li y Ac s es lien is rei e s been convic ed o cri e o violence, s de ned in 8 U.S.C. 6.See sec ion10 ( )(43)(F) o e Ac . A cri e o violence, in re ev n p r , is de ned s " n o ense

s n e e en e use, e p ed u e, or e ened use o p ysic rce. .S.C. 16( ).ere re, s e s u e con ins s n ele en e use, e p ed use, or e enp ysic l rce w l cons i e cri e o violence under e Ac . e re ev n s e o conre ds

A person is uil y o si ple ss ul i e( ) pose y or owin ly c uses bodily in ry or unprivi e ed p ysic l con c o

no er; or(b) ecklessly c uses bodily in u o no er or(c) Ne li en y c ses bodi y inju o no er by e ns o de dly we pon

N.H.RV S 63 2 In n lyzin w e er"p ysic l rce is n ele en o e responden 'sconvic ion, e I i r ion Jud e pp ied e Firs Circui 's oldin inUnited States Nason upra. Nason cri in l sen encin c se, eld e p in nd bi uous e nino e er"p ysic l rce w in e de ni ion o " isde e nor cri e o do es ic violence, cons i u ed anyde ree o p ysic l rce, inc udin e proscribed "o ensive p ysic l con c w in M in

ss s u e.See Un ted States Nason supra, 8 20 see also 8 U S C 922( )(8), (9).

Applyin Na on e I i r ion Jud e de er ined e de n ion o "p sic l rce un8 S.C. 16( ) is bro d enou o enco p ss de rees o rce under New H ps ire's si plss u s u e, incl din "unprivile ed p ysic con c . er, s " nprivile ed p

2 As n ini i l j risdic ion l er, we no e e responde led o ion wi e Ie o June 6, 2011, sk n im o reconsi er is ne , 2011, ecision. e responden

led i ely ppe wi e o rd on J e 2 , 20 1, w ic i e isdic ion ves ed wSee C. . . 1003 23(b)(l ). On July 6, 201 , e I i r ion J d e iss ed n order denyin

responden 's o ion o reconsider. However, s e responden led is ppe prior o eI i ion J e's response o e o ion o reconsider, e I i ion Jud e did no v jurisdic ion o co sider e o ion.Id; see a so Matter oPatino 23 &N Dec. 7 4 ( IA 200I).Assuc , we will dd ess e responden 's ppe l s well s s o io o reconsider.

2Cite as: Luis Rueda-Perez, A098 241 147 (BIA Nov. 17, 2011)


5/8

8 41 147

o a t s he east e essary degree of r e required r a o vi t o u der that s a te, ti at o Judge u d that the respo de t s o vi t o is ategor a ly a r e of v ole e. W

d sagree

Matter /Ve a quez uprathe Board held that the"phys al r e e essary to esta lish thata o e se s a ri e o vio e e u der the A t requires "vio e t r e, or r e apa le of ausphys a pa or i ju y to a ot er persoMatter of Ve a quez, upra,at 28 We adopted heCour s reaso i g iJohn on United tate whi h u d that "phys al r e required"viole t

r e he o text of the Ar ed Ca eer Cri i a A t "ACCA )John on United tate upra,at 127 ; ee a o18 U S.C. 924 e) ), 2) B) )adopti g the old g iJohn on, we otedthat he ACCA s de itio of"v ole t lo y is, i per e t pa t, ide ti al to that 18 U.S

a) ee Matter of Ve a quez upraat 8

U e t e statutes o s ued iMatter of Ve a queza dJohn on United tate he statuteo st ed i United tate Na on volved the i terpre at o of"physi al r e the o text of

18 U S C. 92 g) 9), wh h prohi its possessio of a rea y a dividual o v ted sde ea or r e of do esti v o e e. T e phrase " sde ea or r e of do esti viole eproh ts the "use, a e pted use, or hreate ed use of physi al r e . that wou d rea onab y be expected to cau e bodi y injury " ee8 U.S C 92 g) 8) C) i );United tate Na on, upraat e phas s added). o strui g the phrase "physi al r e i se tio 9 g) 9), t eNa on

our oted hat y add g he quali i g phrasethat wou d rea onab y be expected to cau e bodi yinju " Co ess i te ded to reate a tatio to the a ou t of physi al r e required.eeUnited tate Na on upraat 1 17. The Cou we t o to state that, as the statute already

o ai ed a qual g ph ase l iti g the type of r e pros r ed, this suggested t at Co gress dot i te d r t e ter "physi al r e to e r her li ited.I Apply g t sreaso g,inter a ia

the ou u d that "ph s a r e ludes al ypes of physi a r e.Id at 7 18.

The statute o s ued y theNa on our s su sta t ve y di ere t o 18 U.S C 1a), wh ho tai s o additio a quali i g p ase to he te "phys a r e O the o ra y, the sta u

la guage de i g"v o e t felo y i 18 U .S.C. 9 4e ) ) B) i) as it per ai s to r es agai st heperso ) is vir ua y ide ti a to 18 U.S C a) Th s si la y was oted y theJohn on our

eeJohn on v United tate , upra,at 1 70-71 Moreover, t s disti tio was re og zed heFirst C r uit as a reaso ot to o strue se tio 1 as s i a to se tio 9 g) 9)ee United tate

Boo r, upra at 9 0 reaso i g t at as he two s a utes have sig i a t d ere es,"the aser a alogiz g 922 g) 9) to 1 is par i u ar y wea ). As su h, we o lude that our de is

i Matter of Ve a quezrelyi g o the i terpretatio of the ph ase "physi al r e y the Court John on United tate is disti guis a le o United tate Na on,as the s atute a a yzed iNa on o ai s su sta tive y di ere t a guage o t e ACCAor 18 U.S.C a).

We a so ote hat he F rst Cir uit stated iUnited tate Booker that ts holdi g iNa on isdisti gu sha e oJohn on as John on spe i a y stated t at it was terpreti g the p ase"physi a r e with t e o text of the s atutory de itio of"vio e t fe o y, a d did ot reawhether"the phrase has he sa e ea g the o text of de i g ami demeanor ri e ofdo esti v o e e.John on United tate upraat 7



6/8

A0 8 241 47

As such ag i h h spond n and conc ud ha ou d cision inMa er of Vela quez, u ra con o s h c s p s n d in his cas , such ha h "ph sica c n c ss o

ha h spond n 's o ns is a"c im o vio nc pu pos s o h Ac mus b"vio n cha is c capab o causing ph sica pain o inj o ano h p son

ing o an ana sis o h spond n s convic ion mus d in h h a siassau convic ion und s c ion 63 2 a o h H pshi R vis d a u s quia mp d us o h a n d us o vio n ph sica c und 8 U C 6(Hampshi has p ovid d ha "unp ivi g d ph sica con ac inc ud s a ph sica con jus i d b a o cons nSta ev M chaud 20 A 3d 10 2 ( 2011) conc ud ha somo ns s pu ishab u d his s a u do no n c ssa i qui"vio n c o c capab ocausing ph sica pain o inju o ano h p son hus h spond n s convic ion assau in H pshi is no ca go ica a c im o vio nc und s c ion 01(a)(43)(FAc As such h modi d ca go ica app oach mus b app i dSee Ma er ofM l an25 I&

c 197 199 200 ( IA 2010) (discussing docum n s ha ma b consid d in app ing mod

ca go ica app oach) h co d i h b mand d consid a ion o vidga ding h h spond n 's o ns cons i u s a c im o vio nc und hca go ica app oach Acco ding h o ing o d s wi b n d

ER h app a is sus ain d

FUR ER ER h co d is mand d o h Immi a ion udg h p oc dingconsis n i h h going opinion and h n o a n d cision

4 As ag i h h spond n ha h Immig a ion udg app i d h inco c gin nding his convic ion o b a c im o vio nc d c in o add ss an addi iona guh ais s in his un 13 201 mo ion o consid b h mmig a ion udg

4Cite as: Luis Rueda-Perez, A098 241 147 (BIA Nov. 17, 2011)


7/8

\

TED TATE I T ON CO RTK EDE BLD . ROOM 20

BO TON M 0220

IN THE REMOV CA E OR DA-PEREZ LUIRE P NDENT

ORDER

CA E NO : A098 241 147

.)Th _ is / e orandu of e Cour s De ision and Orders en ered onT is e orandum is solely for eonvenien e of e par ies T e oral or wri en indings De ision

and Orders is e offi ial opinion in is ase ( ) Bo par ieswaived issuan e of a formal oral de ision in e ase

y The responden w s ordered REMOVED fro e Uni ed a es os , _ ( ) in absentia.R pon d nt s appli a ion for VOL T DEP TURE was DEN ED andresponden was ordered removed o in e

al erna ive oResponden 's appli a ion for VOL NT DEP TURE was TED un ilupon pos ing a volun ary depar ure bond in e amoun

of $ o H wi in five business days fro e da e of isOrder wi an al erna e Order of removal oor Responden s all presen o DH wi in( ) ir y days six y da s fro e da e of is Order allne essary ravel do u en s for volun ary depar reResponden s appli a ion for A L was ( gran ed denied( ) wi dra wi pre udi e( ) sub e o e C P under e INA se ion 207(a) 5)( ) Responden now ngly filed a RIVOL asylu appli a ionResponden s appli a ion for W THHO IN of removal under NAse ion 24 (b) 3) was ( gra ed ( ) denied ( ) wi drawn wi pre udi eResponden s appli a ion for WITHHO D N of removal under e Tor ureConven ion was ( ) gran ed ( denied ) wi dra wi pre udi eResponden s appli a ion for DE ERR of re oval under e Tor ureConven ion was ( gran ed ( denied ( ) wi drawn wi pre udi eResponden s appli a ion for C CEL TI N of removal under se ion( ) 20 (b) of NAC ( ) 240A(a) ) 240A(b) ( ) 240A(b) (2of e INA was ( gran ed ( ) denied ( wi drawn wi pre udi e

f gran ed, i was ordered a e DH issue all appropria e do u en sne essary o give effe o is Order Responden ( is ( ) is nosub e o e CAP under NA se ion 240A(e) Responden s appli a ion for a WA VER under e INA se ion

was ( gran ed ( denied ( wi dra or

) o er ( ) T e ondi ions i posed byNA se ion 216 on e reponden s per anen residen s a us were removedResponden s appli a ion for U TMENT of s a us under se ionof e ( ) NA ( NAC ( was( gran ed ( ) denied ( wi drawn wi pre udi e f gran ed

was ordered a DH issue all a ro ria e do umen s ne essar ogive effe o is rder

CA E BER 098 24 47 RE PO ENT R EDA PEREZ LU

Responden s s a us was RE C NDED pursuan o e NA se ion 246Responden s o ion o W THD W is appli a ion for ad ission was


8/8

. I .

granted ) denied. If the respondent fails to ab de by any ofthe conditions directed by the district director of DHS then thealternat Order of removal shal become immediately eff ctive withoutfurther notice or proceedings: the respondent shall be removed fro mthe United States toRespondent was MITTED as a until

As a condition of admission the respondent wasordered to post a $ bondCase was ( ) TERMINATED ) with ) without prejudice

MINISTRATI LY CLOSEDRespondent was orally advised of the IMITATION on discretionaryrelief and consequences for failure to depart as ordered[ ] If you fail to voluntarily depart when and as re ired, you shallbe s ject to civil money penalty of at least $ 1 000 but not more than$5 000, and be ineligible for a period of 10 years for any furtherrelief under IN sections 240 240B 245 and 248 (IN Section 240B(d))[ If you are under a final order of removal and if you willfully fail

or refuse to 1) depart when and as required, 2) make timely applicationin good faith for any documents necessary for departure or 3) present yourself for removal at the time and place required or if you conspireto or take any action designed to prevent or hamper your departure youshall be s ject to civil money pena ty of up to $500 for each day u dersuch violation (IN section 274D a)) If you are removable pursuantto IN 23 (a) then you shall further be fined and/or imprisoned for upto 10 years (INA section 243 (a) 1))Other:

Date Jun 1 2011

A PPE ) waived > rese vedPA M GAGNONJudge

by ( . Respondent ( ) HS ) Both

D E BY: 7-/'THIS DOCUMENTWATO [ l DDATE 3 1

I

CERTIFIC TE OF SERVICESER D BY [ MAIL [ J PERSON SERVICE

Officer IEN [/ Alien's ATT/REP [ 1 IEN c/o CustodialBY [ CO RT ST FF J E

)-(

-

Y2

Documents

Luis Rueda-Perez, A098 241 147 (BIA Nov. 17, 2011)