2
NANOSIMS AND TEM INVESTIGATIONS OF SUPERNOVA SIC GRAINS. J. Kodolányi 1 , C. Vollmer 2 , P. Hoppe 1 and M. Müller 3 , 1 Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, Germany; [email protected]), 2 Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Münster, Germany), 3 Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany). Introduction: About 1 % of presolar SiC grains are the so-called X and C grains which have a superno- va (SN) origin [see 1 and references therein]. SN- derived SiC grains are key to our understanding of con- densation of C-rich dust in SN ejecta, yet only few studies have so far been dedicated to their nanotexture, an important record of condensation conditions [2–4]. The detailed investigation by [2] showed that SiC X grains consist of inclusion-poor, mostly cubic crystals (3C polytype) of 60–460 nm diameter, which often form oriented overgrowths. Besides 3C the only poly- types observed in SN-derived SiC grains are the hexag- onal 2H [2,3,5] and the trigonal 15R [4], which are both very rare. Hynes et al. [2] proposed that the small- er crystal size of X grains relative to that of grains from asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars was the result of more rapid condensation in SN ejecta than in AGB winds. Here we provide new constraints on the conden- sation of SiC in SN ejecta through the study of the in- ternal structure of 6 X grains and a C grain. Procedure and analytical methods: Selection of supernova SiC grains: SiC grains of SN origin were identified in two mounts of an SiC grain separate of the Murchison meteorite (“Mur2012B”), based on their Si isotope compositions. The grains’ Si (and C) isotope composition was determined using ion imaging with the NanoSIMS 50 of the Max Planck Institite for Chemistry, Mainz [6,7]. We selected 7 large (> 0.7 µm) X and C grains for later study with the transmis- sion electron microscope. Five of the selected grains were further analyzed with the NanoSIMS after ion imaging, to obtain their N isotope composition. Preparation of electron transparent lamellae: Elec- tron-transparent slices of the selected grains were pre- pared by a 0.050–20 nA focused Ga + ion beam (FIB; instrument: FEI Nova 600) at the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz. The slices were mounted on Cu grids with a micromanipulator [cf. 3]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): The FIB lamellae were investigated with a Zeiss Libra 200FE transmission electron microscope (200 kV acceleration voltage) equipped with a Köhler illumination system and an in-column Omega energy filter at the Münster University. Besides bright and dark field imaging we also recorded selected area diffraction (SAD) patterns on the grains in different stage tilt positions, which en- abled the accurate determination of the polytype(s) and, in case of polycrystalline grains, the determination of the relative orientation of different grain domains. All bright field and SAD images were recorded in ener- gy-filtered mode with the energy slit centered over the zero loss peak to reduce background noise from inelas- tically scattered electrons. We also used energy disper- sive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to determine the minor element concentrations of the studied grains and to in- fer the chemistry of inclusions. Figure 1. Si isotope composition of presolar SiC grains of type X and C from the literature [2,8–16] with the composi- tion of X and C grains identified so far in our study. δ x Si = 1000 × [(( x Si/ 28 Si)grain/( x Si/ 28 S)Solar System)−1]. Error bars: 1σ. Results: Out of the imaged ca. 4000 SiC grains of the two studied mounts we identified 56 X and 3 C grains. All but one of the grains selected for TEM work have Si, C (and, where available, N) isotope composi- tions typical of X and C grains (Fig. 1). Grain GE2_2.17a, although depleted in 28 Si, like other X grains, has a very low 12 C/ 13 C ratio of 8.5 ± 0.04, atypi- cal of X grains. Two of the 7 grains investigated with TEM are sin- gle crystals of the 3C polytype. The other 5 grains are aggregates of crystals of the same hexagonal polytype (6H, 2 grains) or of more than one different polytypes (3C + 2H, 3C + 6H; 1 and 2 grains, respectively). The size of individual crystals, or grain domains, of poly- crystalline grains varies between ~50 and ~500 nm (Fig. 2a). Domains with a longer diameter of 150–200 nm are the most common. We observed oriented over- 1478.pdf 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016)

NANOSIMS AND TEM INVESTIGATIONS OF SUPERNOVA SIC …NANOSIMS AND TEM INVESTIGATIONS OF SUPERNOVA SIC GRAINS. J. Kodolányi1, C. Vollmer2, P. Hoppe1 and M. Müller3, 1Max Planck Institute

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • NANOSIMS AND TEM INVESTIGATIONS OF SUPERNOVA SIC GRAINS. J. Kodolányi1, C. Vollmer2, P.Hoppe1 and M. Müller3, 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, Germany;[email protected]), 2Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Münster, Germany),3Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research (Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany).

    Introduction: About 1 % of presolar SiC grainsare the so-called X and C grains which have a superno-va (SN) origin [see 1 and references therein]. SN-derived SiC grains are key to our understanding of con-densation of C-rich dust in SN ejecta, yet only fewstudies have so far been dedicated to their nanotexture,an important record of condensation conditions [2–4].The detailed investigation by [2] showed that SiC Xgrains consist of inclusion-poor, mostly cubic crystals(3C polytype) of 60–460 nm diameter, which oftenform oriented overgrowths. Besides 3C the only poly-types observed in SN-derived SiC grains are the hexag-onal 2H [2,3,5] and the trigonal 15R [4], which areboth very rare. Hynes et al. [2] proposed that the small-er crystal size of X grains relative to that of grains fromasymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars was the result ofmore rapid condensation in SN ejecta than in AGBwinds. Here we provide new constraints on the conden-sation of SiC in SN ejecta through the study of the in-ternal structure of 6 X grains and a C grain.

    Procedure and analytical methods: Selection ofsupernova SiC grains: SiC grains of SN origin wereidentified in two mounts of an SiC grain separate of theMurchison meteorite (“Mur2012B”), based on their Siisotope compositions. The grains’ Si (and C) isotopecomposition was determined using ion imaging withthe NanoSIMS 50 of the Max Planck Institite forChemistry, Mainz [6,7]. We selected 7 large (> 0.7µm) X and C grains for later study with the transmis-sion electron microscope. Five of the selected grainswere further analyzed with the NanoSIMS after ionimaging, to obtain their N isotope composition.

    Preparation of electron transparent lamellae: Elec-tron-transparent slices of the selected grains were pre-pared by a 0.050–20 nA focused Ga+ ion beam (FIB;instrument: FEI Nova 600) at the Max Planck Institutefor Polymer Research, Mainz. The slices were mountedon Cu grids with a micromanipulator [cf. 3].

    Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): The FIBlamellae were investigated with a Zeiss Libra 200FEtransmission electron microscope (200 kV accelerationvoltage) equipped with a Köhler illumination systemand an in-column Omega energy filter at the MünsterUniversity. Besides bright and dark field imaging wealso recorded selected area diffraction (SAD) patternson the grains in different stage tilt positions, which en-abled the accurate determination of the polytype(s)and, in case of polycrystalline grains, the determination

    of the relative orientation of different grain domains.All bright field and SAD images were recorded in ener-gy-filtered mode with the energy slit centered over thezero loss peak to reduce background noise from inelas-tically scattered electrons. We also used energy disper-sive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to determine the minorelement concentrations of the studied grains and to in-fer the chemistry of inclusions.

    Figure 1. Si isotope composition of presolar SiC grains oftype X and C from the literature [2,8–16] with the composi-tion of X and C grains identified so far in our study. δxSi =1000 × [((xSi/28Si)grain/(xSi/28S)Solar System)−1]. Error bars: 1σ.

    Results: Out of the imaged ca. 4000 SiC grains ofthe two studied mounts we identified 56 X and 3 Cgrains. All but one of the grains selected for TEM workhave Si, C (and, where available, N) isotope composi-tions typical of X and C grains (Fig. 1). GrainGE2_2.17a, although depleted in 28Si, like other Xgrains, has a very low 12C/13C ratio of 8.5 ± 0.04, atypi-cal of X grains.

    Two of the 7 grains investigated with TEM are sin-gle crystals of the 3C polytype. The other 5 grains areaggregates of crystals of the same hexagonal polytype(6H, 2 grains) or of more than one different polytypes(3C + 2H, 3C + 6H; 1 and 2 grains, respectively). Thesize of individual crystals, or grain domains, of poly-crystalline grains varies between ~50 and ~500 nm(Fig. 2a). Domains with a longer diameter of 150–200nm are the most common. We observed oriented over-

    1478.pdf47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016)

  • growth of grain domains on one another in 3 grains.Stacking faults were observed in 4 of the 7 grains,mostly in 3C domains (Fig. 2b). Twinning occurs in 1grain.

    Inclusions are rare. We found an isometric, Fe- andNi-rich inclusion of about 10 nm diameter in grainGB1_1.1a, and an isometric, 20 nm diameter TiC in-clusion in GE2_2.17a (Figs. 2c and d).

    Figure 2. (a) Electron transparent slice of X grain GB3_2.5awith 50–400 nm domains revealed by abrupt changes (whitedashed lines) in diffraction contrast (bright field, or BF, im-age). (b) Stacking faults (linear features between arrows) inthe 3C domain of X grain GB1_1.1a (BF image). (c) Inclu-sion (indicated by arrow) in X grain GE2_2.17a (BF image).(d) EDX spectrum of the inclusion displayed in (c). The Tiand V peaks suggest that the inclusion is TiC.

    Discussion: Our findings regarding the domain sizeand inclusion content of SiC grains from SN ejecta aresimilar to those of [2]. However, we find that thehexagonal polytypes are more common among our SN-derived SiC grains than reported by the same authorsfor SiC X grains (1 out of 7 grains contained SiC ofhexagonal symmetry) and by [17] for the presolar SiCpopulation as a whole (~20 % of the grains containhexagonal SiC crystal or crystals). In addition, wefound evidence for the wide-spread occurrence of the6H polytype (Fig. 3) among our grains, which has notbeen reported in presolar SiC before. Whether the dis-crepancy between the previous and the present studiesis significant is unclear because of the low number ofgrains investigated (excluding rare SiC inclusions inSN graphites only 10 individual SiC grains of SN ori-gin have been subject to structural analysis before ourwork [2–4]).

    Figure 3. SAD pattern of a 6H SiC domain of X grain GB4_3.3

    The 3C polytype of SiC has been found to form athigher supersaturation and higher Si/C in the gas phaseand lower T than most hexagonal polytypes, such as6H [e.g., 18]. The higher abundance of hexagonalpolytypes among SiC grains of SN origin (~70 % if weconsider only our data and ~40 % if data from [2–4]are also included) than among those from AGB winds(~20 % [17]) may thus indicate that a lower supersatu-ration in the condensing gas is more common in the SNejecta sampled by the X and C grains than in the windsof AGB stars. Furthermore, the occurence of the 6Hpolytype among the SN grains may indicate that crys-tallization extends to higher T in SN ejecta than in thewinds of AGB stars.

    Acknowledgements: We are grateful to AntjeSorowka, Christa Sudek and Wataru Fujiya for theirhelp with sample preparation, and Elmar Gröner for hisassistance with the NanoSIMS analyses. We thankRhonda Stroud for ideas regarding FIB work and theField Museum (Chicago, U.S.A.) for providing theMurchison sample. Our project is financially supportedby DFG SPP 1385 (grants no.: HO2163/2-1 andVO1816/2-1).

    References: [1] Zinner E. (2014) Presolar Grains. In:Holland H. and Turekian K. (eds.) Tretease on Geochem-istry. (II. Ed) pp. 181–213, Elsevier. [2] Hynes M. et al.(2010) Meteoritics & Planet. Sci., 45, 596–614. [3] StroudR. M. et al. (2004) Meteoritics & Planet. Sci., 39, A101.[4] Stroud R. M. et al. (2015) LPSC XLVI, Abstract #2576.[5] Croat K. et al. (2010) Astronom. J., 139, 2159–2169.[6] Gröner E. and Hoppe P. (2006) Appl. Surf. Sci., 252,7148–7151. [7] Kodolányi J. et al. (2015) LPSC XLVI, Ab-stract #1733. [8] Besmehn A. (2000) PhD Thesis. MaxPlanck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz. [9] Besmehn A. andHoppe P. (2003) GCA, 67, 4693–4703. [10] Hoppe P. et al.(2000) Meteoritics & Planet. Sci., 35, 1157–1176.[11] Hoppe P. et al. (2010) ApJ, 719, 1370–1384.[12] Hoppe P. et al. (2012) ApJL, 745, L26. [13] Lin Y. etal. (2010) ApJ, 709, 1157–1173. [14] Marhas K. et al.(2008) ApJ, 689, 622–645. [15] Nittler L. et al. (1996) ApJL,462, L31. [16] Xu Y. et al. (2015) ApJ, 799, 156.[17] Daulton T. L. et al. (2003) GCA, 67, 4743–4767.[18] Fissel A. (2003) Phys. Rep., 379, 149–255.

    1478.pdf47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016)