Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    1/7

    Journal of Archaeological Science 1992, 19,63 l-637

    Charcoal Analysis and the Principle of Least

    Effort -A Conceptual Model

    C. M. Shackleton and F. Prinsh

    (Received 25 Apr il 1991, revised manuscript accepted 10 January 1992)

    The applicability of the Princip le of Least Effort (PLE) to interpretations of palaeo-

    climatic data i s considered, and found lacking in some instances. A conceptual model

    is presented to determine situations in which the PLE may, or may not, apply. This

    helps identify when the PLE may be a useful model for interpretation of appropriate

    data sets.

    Keywords:

    ABUNDANCE, EFFORT, FUELWOOD, SELECTIVITY.

    Introduction

    Interpretation of palaeoenvironmental changes is an important facet of many disc iplines

    including archaeology, botany and geography. Each of these disciplines discerns past

    changes in different ways. The prevailing conditions during particular palaeoenviron-

    ments are archaeologically inferred by several means, including phytoliths, micro and

    macro-fauna1 remains, seed material, pollen and charcoal as sources of information

    (Brothwell Higgs, 1963; Shackley, 198 1). Credence is lent to particular interpretations

    and conc lusions if similar trends are evident from independent, although complementary,

    forms of investigation (Deacon Lancaster, 1988).

    The taxonomic identification of charcoal in particular yields data depicting changes in

    the floral species composition of the area under scrutiny. Combined with ana lysis of

    anatomical features such as vessel diameter (Deacon Lancaster, 1988; Scholtz, 1990)

    and botanical knowledge of the ecological requirements of extant spec ies (also rep-

    resented in the charcoal sample) it is possible to predict some details of the climatic

    conditions preva iling during the different periods (e.g. Deacon et al., 1983; Prio r, 1983;

    Deacon

    et

    al., 1984; Prior Price-Williams, 1985; Prior Tuohy, 1987; Dowson, 1988;

    Tusenius, 1989).

    Trends of increasing or decreasing abundance of chosen indicator species should be

    accorded greater emphasis than erratic changes in the abundance of rarer species. A time

    sequence of dates and species composition data should be set up to emphasize differences

    in the abundance of species (e.g. Prior, 1983).

    Functional interpretation of charcoal data sets rests upon acceptance of the Princip le

    of least effort (Scholtz, 1986; Tusenius, 1986). It is the val idity of the underlying

    assumptions that are the focus on this artic le.

    OWits Rural Facility, P.O. Box 7, Klaserie 1381, South Africa.

    bDepartmen t of Botany, University of Transkei, P.B . Xl, Unitra 5100, South

    Africa.

    631

    03054403/92/06063 I+07 08.00/O 0 1992 Academic Press Limited

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    2/7

    632 C. M. SHACKLETON AND F . PRINS

    Theoretical Developments and the Princip le of Least Effort (PLE)

    The majority of charcoal studies undertaken by archaeologists in southern Africa were

    conducted within the framework of the ecological paradigm. This approach characterized

    Stone Age studies undertaken between the 1960s and 1980s and archaeological develop-

    ments elsewhere. This paradigm viewed environmental change as primary in cultural

    variability and consequently humans were seen as rational but passive actors subject to

    external forces. People merely adapted to factors beyond their control and some

    researchers explained changes in the archaeological record as being stimulated primarily

    by fluctuating environmental circumstances. Although proponents of the ecological

    paradigm warned against environmental determinism, this was the position ultimately

    adopted by those interested in charcoal analysis. Most of these studies assumed a one-to-

    one causal relationship between prehistoric fuelwood collectors and the woody vegetation

    utilized by them. However, some palaeoethnobotanists voiced the opinion that plant

    materials were collected according to cultural rules and that their proportions in the

    archaeological context were not a simple reflection of their abundance in the prehistoric

    environment (Ford, 1979). Unfortunately these ideas, which are supported by ethno-

    graphic observations (Ford, 1979) were largely ignored in favour of general law-like

    statements applying to all cultures and contexts. This is characteristic of much of the

    so-called Processual Archaeology (Hodder, 1986). Such a general law was developed

    by charcoal researchers in the form of the Principle of least effort (PLE).

    In essence the PLE assumes that past peoples collected fuelwood that was closest to the

    homestead, and that all species were collected in direct proportion to their occurrence in

    the surrounding environment. They moved further afield only when fuelwood within the

    immediate surrounds was depleted. In other words, they collected what was easiest-

    hence the name. Accepting this, then the frequency of species in the charcoal sample would

    accurately reflect their abundance in the environment at that time.

    Scholtz (1986) and Tusenius (1986) identified several possible sources of error in the

    accepted assumptions underlying the PLE, and hence possible errors in palaeoclimatic

    interpretations based on charcoal analysis. These sources of error are: (1) potential

    selection of particular species over and above others in the vicinity ; (2) possible differential

    preservation of charcoals from different species; (3) sampling problems both during

    excavation and in the laboratory; and (4) potential non-uniform deposition of charcoal

    throughout the time period under consideration. The authors suggest that another may be

    added, this being the difference in yield ofcharcoal between species (this is currently under

    investigation). Thus, although researchers were aware of the potential non-validity of

    PLE, research projects were, in the absence of any alternative frameworks, stil l based on

    this general principle. In this paper we are interested in investigating the implications for

    archaeological interpretations if the first of the sources of error listed above is found to be

    true.

    Preference for particular fuelwood species

    The PLE assumes that all species were collected as fuelwood in direct proportion to their

    abundance in the environment. If, however, particular species were actively avoided or

    selected, then the charcoal remains would fail to provide an accurate reflection of the

    composition and abundance of the species at that time. Although Prior Price-Williams

    (1985) Scholtz (1986) and Tusenius (1986) amongst others, have questioned the validity

    of this assumption it cannot be falsified directly through archaeological excavation.

    Several ethnographic and biological studies, however, suggest that the assumption may

    indeed be false (Best, 1979; Ford, 1979; Jelenic van Vegten, 1981; Gandar, 1983).

    Unpublished work by Shackleton (in press) shows that the avoidance of several species

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    3/7

    CHARCOAL ANALYSIS

    633

    1

    Fresh wood

    4

    Dry wood

    I I

    b

    *

    I I

    Strong

    6

    5 4

    I

    I

    I

    I

    I

    Wood abundance per person

    1

    High

    Figure 1. Degree of species selectivity as a function of dry and fresh wood

    availabil ity (the numbers lL6 refer to model areas described in the text).

    by fuelwood collectors was as marked as their active selection of others. A considerable

    number of species were neither avoided nor preferred and so the PLE may be applied to

    these.

    A conceptual model

    The model proposed (Figure 1) ideally applies to fuelwood collected for domestic use but

    it will also apply to those species selected for specialist functions like smithing and the

    firing of ceramics. It describes the degree of select ivity for different fuelwood species

    relative to the total abundance of wood in the environment. As such, it can be used to

    predict when the PLE may or may not be in force. It rests on two conditions. Firstly , if

    wood is plentiful then inhabitants wil l select species that are the most desirable for the

    purposes on hand. Initially, selection will be for dry wood of a particular species-it being

    preferred to fresh wood that is heavier to carry and takes time to dry before it can be used.

    Secondly, if wood is in short supply, fuelwood collectors will probably exploit whatever

    wood is available to them. In this instance the PLE will apply. Additional factors such as

    the annual burning of the woody vegetation and clearance of large tracts of woody

    vegetation for agricultural fields may influence the process. However, these factors are

    not considered here and they require further research. For ease of interpretation four

    generalized areas are described in the model. Most settlements probably experienced a

    sequential transition from one to the next during the course of occupation.

    Area 1. This represents the typical situation encountered at a new settlement in a relatively

    unexploited area. There is plenty of fuelwood, both dead and live, with a considerable

    diversity of species available. Thus, there is maximum wood abundance per person and

    hence individuals may select dry wood freely, taking that which is most suited to their

    needs. Even though there is maximum selectivity there is very little effort involved in

    fuelwood collection since total abundance is high, i.e. inhabitants do not have to go far,

    nor search for long, to obtain dry wood of the particular species that they are seeking. In

    summary, therefore, area one is characterized by a high dry wood availability, maximum

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    4/7

    634 C. M. SHACKLETON AND F. PRINS

    selectivity and low effort. Modern analogues are scarce but this situation may apply in

    some nature reserves where controlled exploitation of natural resources by indigenous

    peoples is allowed (Brunton, 1980).

    Area 2. This area is defined by a medium abundance of dry wood, declining selectivity and

    maximum effort. This situation applies near settlements with a declining dry fuelwood

    resource. This may be a new site in a previously exploited area. More likely however, it is

    the same settlement as in (1) above, after several decades of occupation. The size of the

    settlement has increased and the cumulative effects of fuelwood collection over time have

    decreased the total availability of dry wood. The degree of selectivity is decreasing since

    the abundance of the most sought-after species is also decreasing. Some individuals are

    using increasing amounts of previously unfavourable species. Maximum effort is required

    at this stage, since it takes time and energy to seek out the few remaining dry branches of

    the most preferred species. Situations with declining dry fuelwood resources may even

    occur in relatively low population pressure areas where traditional settlement patterns are

    maintained such as was observed in tribal areas near Willowvale in the Transkei (Prins,

    unpubl.).

    Area 3. As time progresses, dry wood of the preferred species is depleted to levels where

    the effort required to seek it out is too great (although it is not necessari ly exhausted

    completely). This stage is characterized by low wood abundance, little selectivity and

    minimal effort. In the most extreme situation any wood present is removed, even if its

    fuelwood properties are poorly rated. In this situation the PLE would apply. Resettlement

    areas in Transkei and Gazankulu, with a relatively high population pressure on the

    available natural resources, exhibit this pattern.

    Area 4. Demand for dry wood far exceeds supply, even if the least favourable species are

    included. Supplementary supplies are obtained through the collection of live wood. Since

    this is a new source of supply, many different species are available and the degree of

    select ivity will therefore be high. The situation is essentially a repetition of Area 1 in the

    model but applied to fresh wood. The model follows the same course for live wood as

    described for Area 2 and 3 pertaining to dry wood. A modern analogue would be long-

    established areas of resettlement in tribal areas such as were observed in northern

    Transkei and the eastern Transvaal Lowveld. However, it should be noted that some

    overlap between Areas 3 and 4 is likely to occur as certain highly favoured species could be

    removed as green wood, even though dry wood of less desirable species occurs abundantly

    near the homestead. This would especially be the case where wood is required for specialist

    functions or ceremonies. Nevertheless, the transition from Area 3 to 4 represents both an

    anthropological and ecological threshold.

    Predictions and implications

    Acceptance of the proposed model has several important implications.

    1. Upon occupation of a site, per-capita wood availability would be high (Area 1). Here

    the PLE does not hold. Therefore the species and abundance of charcoal from this period

    would not be representative of the species composition of the area.

    2. During the later phases of occupation characterized by reduced abundance of preferred

    species, inhabitants would (a) walk further to obtain the species they wanted and/or (b)

    swap to alternative species. There is likely to be a gradual transition from the former to the

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    5/7

    CHARC OAL ANALYSIS 635

    latter. Ultimately, whatever is available will be collected. Should inhabitants adopt the

    first strategy, species not present in the area may be imported into the charcoal deposits

    leading to erroneous interpretation. Even if (a) is adopted, under conditions of high

    fuelwood demands and long occupancy option (b) wi ll ultimately be taken. In this way

    PLE

    may apply during the later occupational phases.

    3. Highly preferred species may be selectively reduced with increasing harvesting pressure.

    This will come about through either an increase in the number of people in the settlement

    and, therefore, a greater fuelwood demand, or continuous removal over long periods.

    Thus, the relative abundance of less desirable species will increase. At some threshold

    abundance, the amount of effort required to seek out the most favourable spec ies is too

    great even though a few sparsely distributed individuals may remain. At th is point an

    increasing proportion of the less desirable species would be evident in the charcoal record.

    Theoretically, the change in focus for particular species from the most desirable to those

    of intermediate preference (not actively sought initia lly, nor actively avoided) would

    provide a respite to the few remaining trees of the most preferred species. This would

    provide time for them to increase in relative abundance, whilst the other species experi-

    enced a decline in relative abundance similar to that which the former previously under-

    went. Since generation times of woody spec ies are long, these changes would take several

    decades. Were that the case, then young fuelwood harvesters would be unable to recognize

    the resurgence of the most preferred species, having being taught what were the most

    desirable from an impoverished assemblage of species. An example of this is the inability

    of young fuelwood collects (younger than 16 years old) to recognize the less abundant fruit

    trees (e.g. Annona senegalensis) in the Timbavati communal grazing lands-and yet older

    community members easily identified it as auseful fruit-bearing species (Shackleton,

    in press). However, at some threshold of decreasing abundance of the species recognized

    as desirable, an increasing proportion of the initial ly most favoured species would again

    be collected.

    This theoretical projection could result in cyc lica l changes of increasing and decreasing

    abundance of spec ies in both the environment and the charcoal remains. This extra-

    polation of the model may be extreme. However, if plausible, it is signi ficant in that it

    projects changes in species abundance in the absence of climatic changes. Furthermore,

    stable limit cycles are not unknown from biological literature (Whittaker, 1975;

    McNaughton Wolf, 1979). If other animal species may induce such cycles why not

    humans?

    4. If cyc lica l changes in species abundances exist in the environment (and hence

    the charcoal record) brought about through human interference important thrusts in

    ethnographic research would be to identify the threshold points of the model. Thus, at

    what threshold densit ies of wood (total and relative spec ies) is there a change in the

    situation from one to which the PLE is not applicable to one where it is?

    5. Even if the extreme, theoretical extrapolation (discussed in implication 3) is

    unattractive, the model st ill demonstrates (although to a lesser degree) that changes in

    relative frequencies of species in the charcoal record through time may not necessarily be a

    result of altered abundance induced through climatic changes. Thus, as argued by Scholtz

    (1986) they may have been the result of the select ive use of the most favoured species.

    For example, data from Deacon et al. (1983,1984) demonstrate changes in abundance

    of several species throughout the stratigraphic record. Th is is interpreted as indicating

    climatic change. This may well have been the case. However, the possib ility also exists that

    these changes were induced or exacerbated by human selection and localized removal of

    some species over others, promoting the exploitation of alternative species.

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    6/7

    636 C. M. SHACKLETON AND F. PRINS

    Simila rly, data presented by Prior (1983) indicate that the frequency of Dichrostachys

    cinerea increases throughout the stratigraphic record, with a concomitant decrease in

    Sclerocarya birrea.

    There is little discussion of these trends, but they could function

    according to the proposed model.

    We make no claim to entirely discredit previous interpretations since we cannot

    fals ify them with current methods.

    Likewise, it is unfortunately equally difficult to falsify

    the above model. However ethnographic evidence lends it support. Falsification may

    best be achieved through independent avenues of investigation all pointing to a similar

    conclusion. Nevertheless, we do suggest that alternative interpretations may exist,

    especially for high resolution observations spanning relatively short time spans where

    potential climatic changes assume lesser importance, and hope that the above model

    makes a contribution towards a rationalization and conceptualization of when and where

    certain interpretations may have greater emphasis over others.

    Finally, the proposed model suggests that charcoal analysis is not limited to palaeo-

    environmental interpretations and that it can be a valuable aid in the understanding

    of past human behaviour. This potential has been realized in the analysis of fuelwood

    diameter (Salisbury Jane, 1940; Scholtz, 1986) but has not been applied to the taxo-

    nomic identification of charcoal and the interpretation of the relative abundances of

    various species. The latter approach has dominated charcoal studies in southern Africa

    and this study emphasizes the need to give more attention to the development of theory.

    Acknowledgements

    Thanks are due to the colleague of CS at the Wits Rural Facili ty for comments and

    discussion on the penultimate draft of this paper.

    References

    Best, M. (1979). The scarc ity of dom estic energy: a study in three vil lages. SALDRU working

    paper, 27. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

    Brothwell, D.

    8c

    Higgs, E. (Ed.) (1963).

    Science in Archaeology: A Comp rehensive Survey of

    Progress and Research. London: Thames Hudson.

    Brunton, M. N. (1980). Conservation and development in Maputoland. In (M. N. Brunton K.

    H. Cooper, Eds) Studies on the Ecology ofMaputoland. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.

    Deacon, H. J., Deacon, J., Scholtz, A., Thackeray, J. F., Brink, J. S. Vogel, J. C. (1984).

    Correlation of palaeoenvironmental data from the Late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits at

    Boomplaas cave, southern cape. In (J. C . Vogel, Ed.) Late Cainozoic Palaeoclimates of the

    Southern Hemisphere. Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Deacon, J. Lancaster, N . (1988). Late Quaternary Palaeoenvironments of Southern Africa.

    Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Deacon, H. J., Scholtz, A. Diatz, L. D. (1983). Fossil charcoals as a source of palaeoecological

    information in the fynbos region. In (H. S. Deacon, Q. B. Hendey J. J. N. Lambrechts, Eds)

    Fynbo s palaeoecology: a preliminary synthe sis. South African National Scientific Progress

    Report 75, 17482. Pretor ia, CSIR.

    Dowson, T. (1988). Shifting vegetation zones n the Holocene and later Pleistocene:preliminary

    charcoal evidence from Jubilee Shelter, Magaliesberg, Southern Transvaal. Palaeoecology of

    Africa 19,233-239.

    Ford, R. I. (1979). Palaeoethnobotany in American Archaeology. Advance s in Archaeological

    Method and Theory 2, 285-336.

    Gandar, M. V. (1983). The Util ization of Trees and Imp act on the Environment: a Study in

    Mahlabatini Distric t, KwaZ ulu. Pietermaritzburg: INR, Univers ity of Natal.

    Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Pas t: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology.

    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 7/23/2019 Shack Elton Et Prins 1992

    7/7

    CHARC OAL ANALYSIS 631

    Jelenic, N. E. & van Vegten, J. A. (1981). A pain in the neck : Thefirewood situation in south-western

    Kgatleng, Botswana. M IR Research Note 5. Universi ty of Botswana, Gaborone.

    McN aughton , S. J. & Wo lf, L. L. (1979). General E cology, 2nd edn. New Y ork: Holt, Rinehart &

    Winston.

    Prior, J. (1983). Investigations on archaeological charcoals from Swaziland, using SEM

    techniques. In (J. C. Vogel, Ed.) Proceedings of the International Sym posium on Late C ainozoic

    Palaeoclimates of the Southern H emisphere, Swaziland 1983. pp. 353-360. Rotterda m: Balkema .

    Prior, J . & Price-Will iams, D. (1985). An investigation of climate change in the Holocene Epoch

    using archaeological charcoal from Swaziland, southern Africa. Journal of Archaeological

    Science 12,457475.

    Prior, J. & Tuoh y, J. (1987). Fuel for Africas fires. New Scientist, 1571,48-51.

    Salisbury, E. J. &Jane, F. W. (1940). Charcoals from Maiden Castle and their significance in

    relation to the vegetation and climatic conditions in prehistoric times . Journal of Ecology 28,

    310-325.

    Scho ltz, A. (1986). Palynological andpalaeobotanicalstudies in the southern Cape. M.A . thesis,

    University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

    Scho ltz, A. (1990). Wood anatom y records rainfall and climate. South African Water Bulletin, 16,

    1619.

    Shackleton, C. M. (in press). Fuelwood harvesting and sustainable util ization in a comm unal

    grazing land protected area of the eastern Transvaal Lowveld. Biological Conservation.

    Shackley , M. (1981). Environmental Archaeology. London: George Allen & Unw in.

    Tusenius , M . L. (1986). The Study of charcoalfrom some southern African archaeological con texts.

    M.A . thesis, Univers ity of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

    Tusen ius, M. L. (1989). Charcoal analytical studies in the north-eastern Cape, South Africa. The

    South African Archaeological Society Goodwin Series 6,77-83.

    Whit taker, R. H. (1975). Comm unit ies and Ecosyste ms, 2nd edn. New York: MacMil lan.