Upload
lekhue
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa)
Projet « Kappa »
(appel d’offre RESIF-RAP 2017)
C. Gélis, L. Provost, B. Froment, F. Tchawe Nziaha (IRSN)
F. Bonilla, Ph. Guéguen (IFSTTAR)
M. Calvet, L. Margerin (OMP)
F. Gatti, F. Lopez-Caballero, S. Touhami, M. Colvez (Centrale Supélec)
F. Courboulex, T. Monfret (GEOAZUR)
E. Bertrand, Ph. Langlaude (CEREMA)
J. Mayor (EDF)
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 2/9
Atténuation du mouvement sismique
( ) )/(0, VsQfr efeAfrA π−⋅=
Qef = facteur de qualité effectif, dépend de f Attenuation:
scinef QQQ111
+=
Campbell (2009)
efQ1
different views on the selection of the pre-event, P-
wave and S-wave portions of the record and on the
selection of fE and fX, which can lead to some vari-
ations in j between analysts. We found that
differences in picking of the pre-event, P-wave and
S-wave portions did not significantly affect the jsobtained.
A semi-automatic procedure to choose the inter-
vals used to compute the direct shear-wave spectra
and noise spectra was also applied. Since both P- and
S-wave arrival times had been previously picked,
time windows of 5 s for the pre-event noise and direct
S-wave were used to compute the Fourier spectra.
Various lengths of time windows from 1 to 10 s were
also tested with similar results, so a standard length of
5 s was finally chosen. The time series were pro-
cessed using a Hanning taper of 5%. The resulting
Fourier spectra were then smoothed by a KONNO and
OHMACHI (1998) filter (filter bandwidth of 40), and
only data having a signal-to-noise ratio greater than
three were used to compute j. The values of fX and fEused to compute j in this procedure were chosen by
the analyst, as in the completely manual approach
described above. In the next section we present the
approach we took to quantify the subjectivity and
precision of the obtained js.In the absence of the high-frequency decay
quantified here by j Fourier amplitude spectra should
be flat above the corner frequency, fc, of the source.
When fitting the best-fit lines to determine j it is
necessary that fE (the frequency chosen as the start of
the best-fit line) is greater than fc otherwise the jestimates can be biased. When using strong-motion
data from moderate and large earthquakes (Mw C 5.5)
as done by ANDERSON and HOUGH (1984) fc is gener-ally lower than 1 Hz hence bias in j due to fc is not aproblem. However, in this study where we are using
data from earthquakes with 3.4 B M B 5.3 fc is
generally between 1 and 6 Hz, using Fig. 8 of DRO-
UET et al. (2008) showing the relation between
magnitude and fc. The fE values are selected here to
be above fc based on visual inspection (Figs. 2, 3)
and, therefore, most best-fit lines will be minimally
affected by fc, especially since fX (the frequency up to
which the line is fitted) is usually greater than 30 Hz.
Site amplification curves, relative to reference
sites displaying little amplification, for some of the
stations considered here are provided by DROUET
45 55 65 75 85Time (s)
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Acc
eler
atio
n (c
m/s
2 )
(a)
1996.197.00.12.45.4060.RA.OGSI.00.ENE.D.SAC
0 10 20 30 40 50Frequency (Hz)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Acc
eler
atio
n Sp
ectr
a (c
m/s
)
35
35
35
35
35
35
Noise S-wave
(b)
0 10 20 30 40 50Frequency (Hz)
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
35
35
35
35
= 0.027 s
(c)
fE
fX
Figure 2Example of direct shear-wave and noise spectra computed from a record that shows a clear high-frequency linear trend. Also shown are the
intervals used to estimate the pre-event noise and the direct shear-wave spectra (black parts of acceleration time-history) and the frequencies fEand fX chosen by one of the analysts (the other analysts chose similar fE and fX for records such as this)
1308 J. Douglas et al. Pure Appl. Geophys.
κo
m
Anderson & Hough (1984), Hough et al. (1988)
erm ⋅+= 0κκ
Douglas et al. (2010)
( ) XEf fffeAfA <<⋅= − ,0
κπ
different views on the selection of the pre-event, P-
wave and S-wave portions of the record and on the
selection of fE and fX, which can lead to some vari-
ations in j between analysts. We found that
differences in picking of the pre-event, P-wave and
S-wave portions did not significantly affect the jsobtained.
A semi-automatic procedure to choose the inter-
vals used to compute the direct shear-wave spectra
and noise spectra was also applied. Since both P- and
S-wave arrival times had been previously picked,
time windows of 5 s for the pre-event noise and direct
S-wave were used to compute the Fourier spectra.
Various lengths of time windows from 1 to 10 s were
also tested with similar results, so a standard length of
5 s was finally chosen. The time series were pro-
cessed using a Hanning taper of 5%. The resulting
Fourier spectra were then smoothed by a KONNO and
OHMACHI (1998) filter (filter bandwidth of 40), and
only data having a signal-to-noise ratio greater than
three were used to compute j. The values of fX and fEused to compute j in this procedure were chosen by
the analyst, as in the completely manual approach
described above. In the next section we present the
approach we took to quantify the subjectivity and
precision of the obtained js.In the absence of the high-frequency decay
quantified here by j Fourier amplitude spectra should
be flat above the corner frequency, fc, of the source.
When fitting the best-fit lines to determine j it is
necessary that fE (the frequency chosen as the start of
the best-fit line) is greater than fc otherwise the jestimates can be biased. When using strong-motion
data from moderate and large earthquakes (Mw C 5.5)
as done by ANDERSON and HOUGH (1984) fc is gener-ally lower than 1 Hz hence bias in j due to fc is not aproblem. However, in this study where we are using
data from earthquakes with 3.4 B M B 5.3 fc is
generally between 1 and 6 Hz, using Fig. 8 of DRO-
UET et al. (2008) showing the relation between
magnitude and fc. The fE values are selected here to
be above fc based on visual inspection (Figs. 2, 3)
and, therefore, most best-fit lines will be minimally
affected by fc, especially since fX (the frequency up to
which the line is fitted) is usually greater than 30 Hz.
Site amplification curves, relative to reference
sites displaying little amplification, for some of the
stations considered here are provided by DROUET
45 55 65 75 85Time (s)
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Acc
eler
atio
n (c
m/s
2 )
(a)
1996.197.00.12.45.4060.RA.OGSI.00.ENE.D.SAC
0 10 20 30 40 50Frequency (Hz)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
Acc
eler
atio
n Sp
ectr
a (c
m/s
)
35
35
35
35
35
35
Noise S-wave
(b)
0 10 20 30 40 50Frequency (Hz)
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
35
35
35
35
= 0.027 s
(c)
fE
fX
Figure 2Example of direct shear-wave and noise spectra computed from a record that shows a clear high-frequency linear trend. Also shown are the
intervals used to estimate the pre-event noise and the direct shear-wave spectra (black parts of acceleration time-history) and the frequencies fEand fX chosen by one of the analysts (the other analysts chose similar fE and fX for records such as this)
1308 J. Douglas et al. Pure Appl. Geophys.
Anderson & Hough (1984)
Douglas et al. (2010)
À r :
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 3/9
Utilisation de Kappa
GMPEs
Zones de sismicité faible à modérée
Zones actives
Kappa
ì Aléa sismique (« host-to-target ») Campbell, 2003 ; Cotton et al., 2006
ì Prédiction du mouvement sismique (effet de site)
Boore, 2003
equation, the slope of the spectral decay d lnA!f"=df is#πκ. Anderson and Hough (1984) noted that if Qef!r"and thus t$ is independent of frequency, the effect of attenua-tion on a Brune (1970, 1971) source displacement spectrum,for which the high-frequency decay is proportional to f#2,will yield the spectral shape given by both Cormier(1982) and equation (5). These authors further found thatκ was dependent on distance with a nonzero intercept thatthey interpreted to be the attenuation due to the propagationof S waves through the subsurface geological structure and aslope that they interpreted to be the incremental attenuationdue to the horizontal propagation of S waves through thecrust. They also showed that the spectral decay of the loga-rithm of the Fourier acceleration spectrum with frequency,assuming an ω-square source spectrum, is flat (i.e., κ % 0)when Qef % ∞ and Qef ∝ f and is negative (i.e., κ > 0)when Qef % Q0 and Qef ∝ fη!η < 1". However, only whenQef % Q0 (a constant) is the spectral decay described exactlyby equation (5). Fitting equation (5) to a model with a frac-tional frequency dependence ofQef will yield a smaller valueof κ than a model in which Qef is assumed to be constant,which emphasizes the importance of the standard assumption
that Qef is independent of frequency when interpreting κas a site parameter. Otherwise, the true value of Qef will beunderestimated.
Hough et al. (1988) and Hough and Anderson (1988)performed a thorough study of κ using the recordings ofsmall earthquakes from the Anza seismic array in southernCalifornia. Based on this analysis, Hough and Anderson(1988) proposed a general model for κ given by the equation
κ!r" %Z
pathQi!z"#1VS!z"#1dr; (6)
where Qi is the frequency-independent component of Qef atdepth z within the profile. They used this model to infer theattenuation structure at Anza from a regional crustal velocitymodel. They noted that their proposed model for κ!r" wasthe same as that given by Cormier (1982) for t$ in equa-tion (4), except that it used only the frequency-independentcomponent of Qef . Hough et al. (1988) concluded that thesimilarity of the distance-dependence of κ!r" in the Anzaand Imperial Valley regions of southern California, areasin which the intercepts at r % 0 were very different presum-ably due to the vastly different subsurface geology, supportedthe earlier assumption by Anderson and Hough (1984) thatthe intercept of κ!r" represents the attenuation of seismicwaves within the geological structure beneath the site andthat the distance-dependence of κ!r" represents the attenua-tion due to the horizontal propagation of seismic waves with-in the crust. Hough et al. (1988) referred to this site com-ponent of κ!r" as κ0. Anderson (1991) generalized the linearκ!r" model of Hough and Anderson (1988) and Hough et al.(1988) by proposing a mathematical formulation of the ob-served behavior of κ that regarded this parameter to be anarbitrary function of distance that he defined by the equation
κ!r" % κ0 & ~κ!r"; (7)
where κ0 is the intercept at r % 0.Since being introduced, κ0 has become the preferred
parameter for incorporating site attenuation in the calculationof amplification factors using the quarter-wavelength methodof Joyner et al. (1981). A summary of κ0 estimates for a vari-ety of geological conditions throughout the United States hasbeen compiled by Anderson (1986, 1991) and Silva andDarragh (1995). Even Halldorsson and Papageorgiou (2005)have adopted it as their high-frequency filter parameter in therevision of the specific barrier model of the earthquakesource (Papageorgiou and Aki, 1983) because of its betterfit to strong-motion data. However, these latter authors con-tinue to suggest that it could be a source parameter ratherthan a site parameter.
In the quarter-wavelength method, the site amplificationof the Fourier amplitude spectrumof acceleration is calculatedfrom the equation (Boore, 2003)
Amp!f" % !ρSβS=!ρ !β"1=2 exp!#πκ0f"; (8)
Figure 3. Fourier amplitude spectrum of the N85° E componentof ground acceleration recorded at Cucapah during the MexicaliValley earthquake of 9 June 1980 (ML 6.2). The accelerographwas a digital recorder that samples at a rate of 200=sec. (A) log-log axes; (B) linear-log axes (after Anderson and Hough, 1984).
2368 K. W. Campbell
Campbell (2009)
Extraits USGS, M>5
Contenu du projet RESIF-RAP « Kappa » Approche empirique ▌ Données (françaises RESIF) ▌ Calcul de Kappa et Q
Approche numérique ▌ Milieu connu (Q) ▌ Tests de sensibilité
4/9 Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier
Application au contexte français (Nice) ▌ Vers l’estimation du mouvement pour un site spécifique
Participants : C. Gélis, L. Provost, B. Froment, F. Tchawe Nziaha (IRSN) F. Bonilla, Ph. Guéguen (IFSTTAR) M. Calvet, L. Margerin (OMP) F. Gatti, F. Lopez-Caballero, S. Touhami, M. Colvez (Centrale Supélec) F. Courboulex, T. Monfret (GEOAZUR) E. Bertrand, Ph. Langlaude (CEREMA) J. Mayor (EDF) Objectifs: Publications communes (1 résumé soumis à SSA 2018)
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 5/9
Contenu du projet – approche empirique ì Estimation de Kappa sur quelques stations sismologiques
françaises à l’aide des données les plus récentes (et autres stations)
A non-automatic procedure for estimating j was
adopted because we noted that the frequency, fE, atwhich the acceleration spectral amplitudes show a
decline varied significantly from record to record and
therefore assuming a constant fE, such as has been
done in some previous studies, could lead to biased
estimates for j. Similarly, due to varying signal-to-
noise ratios (visually inspected), fX shows large
variations and therefore it was not possible to use a
constant value for all records. Since the procedure
followed here is non-automatic, it is quite time-con-
suming and also subjective because analysts can have
-5˚ 0˚ 5˚ 10˚
45˚
50˚
12
4˚ 5˚ 6˚ 7˚ 8˚ 9˚41˚
42˚
43˚
44˚
45˚
46˚
47˚
48˚
49˚
0 50 100
km
Besancon
ColmarEpinal
NancyStrasbourg
Lons-le-Saunier
MaconBourg-en-Bresse
Lyon
St.-Etienne
Valence
Privas
Gap
Grenoble
AvignonNimes
Le-Puy-en-Velay
Montpellier
MarseilleToulon
Digne-les-Bains
Nice
(1)
-2˚ -1˚ 0˚ 1˚ 2˚ 3˚
42˚
43˚
0 50 100
km
Biarritz
Pau
Lourdes St-Gaudens
Pamplona
Huesca
Gerona
Narbonne
Beziers
Carcassonne
Perpignan
(2)
Figure 1Earthquake (circles) and station (triangles) locations and travel paths (lines) of the records used for this study. 1 Alps and Cote d’Azur
(southern part of map) and 2 Pyrenees
Vol. 167, (2010) A j Model for Mainland France 1307
Douglas, Bonilla, Gehl et Gélis (2010)
This may be explained by the fact that some of the
stations are located in the sedimentary Grenoble
basin where the deep soil layer could lead to large
attenuation.
Figures 7 and 8 show j estimates and fitted linear
relations for 11 stations located in the Alps and
the Pyrenees. Two sets of fits were made: one in
which the slope (mj) and the intercept (j0) were
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Soil
(s)
Standard: 0 = 0.0350 s, m = 0.000156 s / kmWeighted: 0 = 0.0347 s, m = 0.000161 s / km
Alps
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Distance (km)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Roc
k(s
)
Standard: 0 = 0.0268 s, m = 0.000156 s / kmWeighted: 0 = 0.0254 s, m = 0.000161 s / km
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Standard: 0 = 0.029 s, m = 0.000204 s / kmWeighted: 0 = 0.029 s, m = 0.000205 s / km
Côte d’Azur
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Distance (km)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Standard: 0 = 0.025 s, m = 0.000204 s / kmWeighted: 0 = 0.024 s, m = 0.000205 s / km
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Standard: 0 = 0.024 s, m = 0.000153 s / kmWeighted: 0 = 0.025 s, m = 0.000152 s / km
Pyrenees
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Distance (km)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Standard: 0 = 0.017 s, m = 0.000153 s / kmWeighted: 0 = 0.018 s, m = 0.000152 s / km
Figure 6Distance dependence of j values for three regions in mainland France. The top plots present the results for stations located on soil. The bottom
plots show the results for stations located on rock
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
(s)
Unc. standard: 0 = 0.023 s, m = 0.000125 s / kmUnc. weighted: 0 = 0.022 s, m = 0.000126 s / kmCon. standard: 0 = 0.0174 s, m = 0.000156 s / kmCon. weighted: 0 = 0.0164 s, m = 0.000161 s / km
OGAN (Rock)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Unc. standard: 0 = 0.022 s, m = 0.000251 s / kmUnc. weighted: 0 = 0.023 s, m = 0.000246 s / kmCon. standard: 0 = 0.0362 s, m = 0.000156 s / kmCon. weighted: 0 = 0.0354 s, m = 0.000161 s / km
OGMO (Rock)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Distance (km)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
(s)
Unc. standard: 0 = 0.034 s, m = 0.000108 s / kmUnc. weighted: 0 = 0.035 s, m = 0.000108 s / kmCon. standard: 0 = 0.0263 s, m = 0.000156 s / kmCon. weighted: 0 = 0.0265 s, m = 0.000161 s / km
OGMU (Rock)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Distance (km)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.160.18
Unc. standard: 0 = 0.019 s, m = 0.000186 s / kmUnc. weighted: 0 = 0.021 s, m = 0.000176 s / kmCon. standard: 0 = 0.0229 s, m = 0.000156 s / kmCon. weighted: 0 = 0.0226 s, m = 0.000161 s / km
OGSI (Rock)
Figure 7j estimates and their ±1 standard deviations for stations located in the Alps. Also shown are the fitted linear relations. Four best-fit lines werefitted for each station: two (using standard and weighted regression) in which mj was allowed to vary (black) and two (using standard and
weighted regression) in which mj was constrained to the value from the regional analysis shown in Fig. 6 (grey)
1312 J. Douglas et al. Pure Appl. Geophys.
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 6/9
Contenu du projet – approche empirique ì Vers une comparaison avec l’estimation de l’atténuation
(Qi et Qsc) aux mêmes stations
Mayor, Traversa, Calvet, Margerin (2017)
Exemple à Taiwan : Margerin, Gillet, Planès, Calvet, Hung (2017)
▌ Comparaison avec carte existante (Qi)
▌ Station par station : Qi et Qsc
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier
Vs=2000 m/s ; ν = 0.25 ; ρ = 2000 kg/m3 Qs = Vs/20 (=100) ; Qp = 2*Qs (=200)
7/9
Contenu du projet – approche numérique ì Exploration de la physique liée à Kappa
20 km
5 km
Gélis et Bonilla, en cours
▌ Simulations 2D (préliminaires)
▌ Vers des simulations 3D (Gatti, Lopez-Caballero)
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 8/9
Contenu du projet - application ì Application « host-to-target » à Nice
Provost, Gélis, Bonilla, en cours
GMPE au rocher κGMPE
Rocher du site κrocher site
Site dans bassin
Host-to-target Al Atik et al. (2014) Fonction d’amplification
▌ Résultats préliminaires
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 9/9
Etat des lieux ì Projet d’un an (début 1er juillet 2017), soumis en réponse à un
appel d’offre dans le cadre du GIS-RAP, possibilité de prolongation (sans budget supplémentaire)
ì 6 000 € budget (+ 4 650 € autres ressources) ì Cofinancement M2 ì Ressources informatiques ì Réunions
ì 2 réunions en visio depuis début projet (autres planifiées)
ì Différents objectifs et approches autour d’une même thématique dans un groupe avec des compétences et connaissances très complémentaires
ì Utilisation des données du réseau sismologique français
ì Comment pérenniser ce groupe ?
Etude numérique et empirique de l’atténuation haute fréquence (Kappa) – Journées RESIF – 29-31 janvier 2018, Montpellier 10/20