Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
GABA from reactive astrocytes impairs memory in mouse
models of Alzheimer disease
Seonmi Jo
*, Oleg Yarishkin
*, Yu Jin Hwang, Ye Eun Chun, Mijeong Park, Dong Ho Woo, Jin
Young Bae, Taekeun Kim, Jaekwang Lee, Heejung Chun, Hyun Jung Park, Da Yong Lee,
Jinpyo Hong, Hye Yun Kim, Soo-Jin Oh, Seung Ju Park, Hyo Lee, Bo-Eun Yoon, YoungSoo
Kim, Yong Jeong, Insop Shim, Yong Chul Bae, Jeiwon Cho, Neil W. Kowall, Hoon Ryu,
Eunmi Hwang, Daesoo Kim† and C. Justin Lee
†
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Nu
mber
of p
laqu
es
0
200
150
100
50
ba2 months 4 months 6 months
8 months 11 months 23 months
300 mm
Plaque
WT APP/PS1
2 4 6 8 11 23All
Age (month)
c
Wild
-typ
eA
PP
/PS
1
GfapPlaque Iba1 Merge + DAPI
Wild
-typ
eA
PP
/PS
1
GfapPlaque Iba1 Merge + DAPI
200 mm
50 mm
Plaque / Gfap / Iba1 / DAPI
d
SFig 1
eDG CA1 CA3
Co
ntr
ol
Ka
inic
acid
CA3
Wild
-typ
eA
PP
/PS
1
PI
DAPI
50 mm 10 mm
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Supplementary Figure 1. Amyloid plaques, reactive astrocytes, and a lack of neuronal
death.
(a) Thioflavin-S staining of amyloid plaques in the hippocampus. APP/PS1 mice start to
develop amyloid plaques at the age of 4 months and develop more with aging.
(b) Average number of plaques as a function of age (a). The number sigmoidally increases
with age while wild-type mice show no plaque at any ages tested. WT: wild-type. 6 slices
were analyzed for each group. Data are means SEM (error bars).
(c) Confocal images show numerous reactive astrocytes and activated microglia clustered
around amyloid plaques in APP/PS1 mice at 9 months of age. Gfap: glial fibrillary acidic
protein, Iba1: ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule-1. DAPI: 4', 6-diamidino-2-
phenylindole.
(d) High-magnification images of the molecular layer of DG from white box in (c).
(e) Confocal images of propidium iodide (PI) and DAPI staining show no apparent cell death
in the hippocampus of both wild-type and APP/PS1 mice (11–12 months of age). For positive
control, wild-type mice were injected with kainic acid (25 mg kg-1
, i.p.) 48 h before PI
injection. CA: Ammon’s horn of hippocampus (Cornu Ammonis), DG: dentate gyrus.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Wild-type 5XFAD
Gfap
GABA
Merge
30 mm
MoDG
GrDG
Pla
qu
e/
Gfa
p/
GA
BA
/ D
AP
I
2 months
Wild-type APP/PS1
4 months 23 months8 months6 months 11 months2 months 23 months
20 mm
Gfap
Plaque
GABA
Merge + DAPI
20 mm
Gfap
Plaque
GABA
Merge + DAPI
a b
d
SFig 2
c APP/PS1
GF
AP
/ G
AB
A
Gfa
p/
Iba
1/ G
AB
A
Gfap
Iba1
GABA
Gfap
GABA
Iba1
GABA
20 mm
Supplementary Figure 2. GABA in the reactive astrocytes of APP/PS1 and 5XFAD mice.
(a) Representative confocal images of thioflavin-S staining, Gfap and GABA
immunostaining in the molecular layer of DG. Wild-type mice didn’t show amyloid plaques
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
and GABA-containing reactive astrocytes even at the age of 23 months. Gfap-negative and
GABA-positive staining indicates GABAergic interneurons.
(b) Representative confocal images of APP/PS1 mice at various ages. APP/PS1 mice start to
develop amyloid plaques at the age of 4 months. Although the exact level of Gfap and GABA
varies among amyloid plaques, GABA-positive reactive astrocytes are consistently observed
at all ages with amyloid plaques.
(c) Representative confocal images of Gfap, Iba1, and GABA immunostaining in the
molecular layer of DG. (12 months of age) show that GABA is not colocalized with Iba1 but
co-localized with Gfap.
(d) Representative confocal images of 14-month-old 5XFAD mice. GABA is accumulated in
reactive astrocytes of 5XFAD mice.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
a bW
ild-t
ype
AP
P/P
S1
Gfap Gad67 GABA Merge
10 mm
Wild
-type
AP
P/P
S1
Gfap Gad65 GABA Merge
10 mm
c d
e f g hGad67 in astrocytes
Inte
nsity o
f G
ad6
7
in G
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
100
50
0
150
7 8
NS
Inte
nsity o
f G
ad6
5
inG
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
100
50
0
150
7 10
NS
Inte
nsity o
f M
aoa
inG
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
80
40
0
120
5 5
NS
Gad65 in astrocytes Maoa in astrocytes Abat in astrocytes
Inte
nsity o
f A
bat
in G
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
160
80
0
240
18 13
NS
Wild
-type
AP
P/P
S1
Gfap Maoa GABA Merge
10 mm
Wild
-type
AP
P/P
S1
Gfap Abat GABA Merge
10 mm
i
Wild
-typ
eA
PP
/PS
1
Gfap GABAGat1 Merge + DAPI
Gfap / Gat1 / GABA / DAPI
20 mm
j
Wild
-typ
eA
PP
/PS
1
Gfap GABAGat3
Gfap / Gat3 / GABA / DAPI
Merge + DAPI
20 mm
Inte
nsity o
f G
at1
inG
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
40
20
0
60
WT APP/PS1
10 8
NS
Gat1 in astrocytes
Inte
nsity o
f G
at3
inG
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
40
20
0
60
WT APP/PS1
10 9
Gat3 in astrocytes
NS
Gfap / Gad67 / GABA Gfap / Gad65 / GABA
Gfap / Maoa / GABA Gfap / Abat / GABA
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Supplementary Figure 3. Gad67, Gad65, Maoa, Abat, Gat1, and Gat3 expression in
reactive astrocytes.
(a–d) Expression of Gad67 (a), Gad65 (b), Maoa (c), and Abat (d) in the molecular layer of
DG was tested by immunostaining. Each enzyme is minimally expressed in astrocytes and
not changed in GABA-containing reactive astrocytes near the amyloid plaque (9 months of
age).
(e–h) Quantification of confocal images. Mean intensity of Gad67 (e), Gad65 (f), Maoa (g),
and Abat (h) was measured in Gfap-positive pixels. NS
P > 0.05 (t-test).
(i–j) Expression of Gat1 (i) and Gat3 (j) in the molecular layer of DG was tested by
immunostaining. Mean intensity of Gat1 (i) or Gat3 (j) was measured in Gfap-positive pixels.
Expression of both transporters is not changed in GABA-containing reactive astrocytes near
the amyloid plaque (9 months of age). NS
P > 0.05 (t-test).
Gad: glutamate decarboxylase. Maoa: monoamine oxidase A, Abat: GABA transaminase,
Gat: GABA transporter, WT: wild-type. AU: arbitrary unit. Number on each bar refers to the
number of cells analyzed. Data are means ± SEM (error bars).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
eN-acetyl-γ-
aminobutyratePutrescine
N-acetyl-γ-
aminobutyraldehyde
Mono-acetyl
putrescine
MAOBSAT UnknownGABA
ALDH2
Acetyl-CoA Coenzyme A, H+ O2, H2O H2O2, NH4+ NAD+, H2O 2H+, NADH H2O Acetate
Wild-type APP/PS1
Gfap
Maob
Merge
50 mm
gf Wild-type APP/PS1
Gfap
Merge
GABA
Maob
10 mm
a
Wild
-type
AP
P/P
S1
Putrescine Merge + DAPIGfap GABA
Gfap / Putrescine / GABA / DAPI
MoDG
GrDG
b
Wild
-typ
e(G
fap-G
FP
)A
PP
/PS
1A
PP
/PS
1
20 mmGfap-GFP Putrescine Merge
Gfap Putrescine Merge
Iba1 Putrescine Merge
h i
Ma
ob
activity (
mo
lg
-1h
r-1)
0.4
0.2
0
0.6
0.8
Water Sele
4 4
***
Ma
oa
activity (
mo
lg
-1h
r-1)
0.2
0.1
0
0.3
Water Sele
4 4
NS
j
Maob
Maoa
Water Selegiline
SFig 4G
fap
/ M
aob
Gfa
p/ M
aob
/ G
AB
A
Putrescine
GF
PG
fap
Iba
1
Inte
nsity o
f putr
escin
e
in G
fap
+pix
els
(A
U)
150
0
200
100
c**
10 10
WT APP/PS1
50
dP
ears
on’s
corr
ela
tion
0.2
0.4
0
6 6
Gfap-GFP
6
Gfap Iba1
WT APP/PS1
0.1
0.3
50 mm
Merge
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Supplementary Figure 4. Putrescine, Maob expression, and Maob enzyme activity.
(a) Presence of putrescine, a GABA precursor, was detected by immunostaining.
Representative confocal images show global existence of putrescine in the DG molecular
layer including Gfap-positive areas. Putrescine is increased in APP/PS1 mice, and most
intense staining is observed around amyloid plaques (arrowheads) and near the GABA-
containing reactive astrocytes. In both genotypes, putrescine is absent in neurons which are
clustered at the granule cell layer (10 months of age).
(b) Confocal images show that intense staining of putrescine is well colocalized with Iba1-
positive microglia in APP/PS1 mice (10 months of age).
(c) Quantification of confocal images. Mean intensity of putrescine was measured in Gfap-
positive pixels. **
P < 0.01 (t-test).
(d) Pearson’s correlation coefficients show that putrescine is colocalized with Iba1 better than
Gfap or Gfap-GFP.
(e) Putrescine degradation III pathway for GABA production. MAOB mediates the second
reaction step. SAT1: putrescine acetyltransferase, ALDH2: mitochondrial aldehyde
dehydrogenase.
(f–g) Confocal images representing labeling with two commercially available antibodies,
which are directed against different epitopes, show increased expression of Maob in GABA-
containing reactive astrocytes of APP/PS1 mice (10 months of age). Antibodies were
purchased from Santa Cruz Inc.(f) and Sigma Inc.(g).
(h) Colorimetric enzymatic activity assay of Maob. Maob activity in the hippocampus is
selectively inhibited by drinking water administration of selegiline (5–10 mg kg-1
day-1
for 3
days) in wild-type mice (13 months of age).
(i) Maob activity after selegiline administration. Sele: selegiline. ***
P < 0.001 (t-test).
(j) Maoa activity after selegiline administration. n.s.
P > 0.05 (t-test).
AU: arbitrary unit. Number on each bar refers to the number of hippocampi analyzed. Data
are means ± SEM (error bars).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
0.4
1.2
1.6
0
Ab
monom
er
norm
aliz
ed t
o b
-actin
Water Sele
APP/PS1
3 3
NS
b c
e f
5 pA
500 ms
Wild-type
APP/PS1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
sEPSC peak amplitude (pA)
Cum
ula
tive p
robabili
ty
10 20 30
Wild-typeAPP/PS1
Am
plit
ude (
pA
)
6
3
011 11
**
5 15 250
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
sEPSC interevent interval (ms)
Cum
ula
tive p
robabili
ty
2,000 4,000 6,000
Wild-typeAPP/PS1
Fre
quency (
Hz)
2
1
011 11
*
a
d
5 pA
500 ms
Wild-type + TTX
APP/PS1 + TTX
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
mEPSC peak amplitude (pA)
Cum
ula
tive p
robabili
ty
10 30
Wild-type + TTXAPP/PS1 + TTX
Am
plit
ude (
pA
)
6
3
010 10
*
5 150
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0
mEPSC interevent interval (ms)
Cum
ula
tive p
robabili
ty
2,000 4,000 6,000
Wild-type + TTXAPP/PS1 + TTX
Fre
quency (
Hz)
1.5
0.5
010 10
NS
1.0
20 25
mEPSC
sEPSC
SFig 5
g
PP
Stim
Patch-+
100 pA
50 ms
Selegiline
Wild-type APP/PS1
Control SelegilineControl
● Wild-type + control ● Wild-type + selegiline● APP/PS1 + control● APP/PS1 + selegiline
Stimulus intensity (mA)0 100 200 300 400 500
eE
PS
Cam
plit
ude (
pA
)
200
400
600
800
0 eE
PS
Ca
mp
litu
de
(pA
)200
400
600
800
0Cont Sele Cont Sele
Wild-type APP/PS1
9 109 10
**NS
NS
h i
j
hAPP
TetramerTrimerDimer
Monomer
b-actin
Water Selegiline
12 12 10.5 12 12 10.5 Age
(month)
0.2
0.4
0.8
0
Ab
olig
om
er
norm
aliz
ed t
o b
-actin
Water Sele
APP/PS1
3 3
NS
0.6
0.8
Supplementary Figure 5. Spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSC), miniature EPSCs (mEPSC),
input-output relationship, and Ab species in DG of wild-type and APP/PS1 mice.
(a–c) sEPSCs recorded from granule cells of DG in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice (N = 2 for
each group; both sexes at 12–12.5 months of age).
(a) Representative traces of sEPSCs.
(b) Cumulative probability of sEPSC peak amplitude. Inset bar graph: Average amplitude of
sEPSCs. **
P < 0.01 (t-test).
(c) Cumulative probability of sEPSC interevent interval. Inset bar graph: Average frequency
of sEPSCs. * P < 0.05 (t-test).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
(d–f) mEPSCs recorded from granule cells of DG in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice (N = 2 for
each group; both sexes at 12–12.5 months of age).
(d) Representative traces of mEPSCs.
(e) Cumulative probability of mEPSC peak amplitude. Inset bar graph: Average amplitude of
mEPSCs.*P < 0.05 (t-test).
(f) Cumulative probability of mEPSC interevent interval. Inset bar graph: Average frequency
of mEPSCs. NS
P > 0.05 (t-test).
(g–i) Input-output relationship of granule cells of DG in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice with or
without pretreatment of selegiline (100 mM) (N = 2 for each group; both sexes at 12–12.5
months of age).
(g) Schematic diagram for the input-output relationship experiments and representative traces
of eEPSCs evoked by stimuli of 300 mA intensity.
(h) Relationships between stimulus intensity and eEPSC amplitude. **
P < 0.01 for genotype, NS
P > 0.05 for drug (Two-way repeated measures ANOVA). ***
P < 0.001 for APP/PS1 +
selegiline at 50 ms (One-way ANOVA and bonferroni test).
(i) Mean amplitudes of eEPSCs evoked by stimuli of 300 mA intensity. **
P < 0.01 for
genotype, NS
P > 0.05 for drug (Two-way ANOVA).
(j) Effect of selegiline on the level of Ab oligomer and monomer in APP/PS1 mice. Western
blots of Ab in DG using 6E10 antibody (N = 3 for each group; male at 10.5–12 months of
age) revealed that the level of Ab monomer and oligomer are not significantly altered by oral
administration of selegiline for 1 week. NS
P > 0.05 (t-test).
EPSC: excitatory post-synaptic current. Number on each bar refers to the number of cells (b,
c, e, f, i) and mice (j) analyzed. N refers to the number of animals studied. Data are means (c,
f, h, i, j) or medians (b, e) ± SEM (error bars).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
f
Control Selegiline
APP/PS1
e APP/PS1
Sp
ike
pro
ba
bili
ty
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.8
0.2
0
0 400 600 800 1,000200
● Control (n = 5)
● Selegiline (n = 3)
50 mV
50 ms
Stimulus intensity (mA)
c d
a
Before + BIC, CGP Before + BIC, CGP
Wild-type
Wild-type + selegilineWild-type + water
Probabilitymax
ES50
Spik
e p
rob
abili
ty
Stimulus intensity (mA)
Sp
ike
pro
ba
bili
ty
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.8
0.2
0
0 400 600 800 1,000200
Stimulus intensity (mA)
0.6
0.4
1.0
0.8
0.2
0
0 400 600 800 1,000200
● Before (n = 15)
● + BIC, CGP (n = 15)
● Before (n = 12)
● + BIC, CGP (n = 12)
bWild-type
SFig 6
50 mV
50 ms
50 mV
50 ms
Supplementary Figure 6. Effect of selegiline on spike probability of dentate granule cells
in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice.
(a–d) Selegiline has no apparent effect on spike probability in wild-type littermates (N = 2 for
WT + water; N = 3 for WT + selegiline; both sexes at 12–13 months of age).
(a) Example traces of evoked EPSP and action potential in wild-type mice at 300 mA
stimulation, before and after bath application of GABA receptor antagonists (BIC: 10 mM
bicuculline. CGP: 5 mM CGP55845).
(b) Example traces in selegiline-administrated wild-type mice (5–10 mg kg-1
day-1
, oral
administration for 7 days) at 300 mA stimulation, before and after bath application of GABA
receptor antagonists.
(c) Summary graph of spike probability in wild-type mice versus stimulus intensity.
(d) Summary graph of spike probability in selegiline-administered wild-type mice versus
stimulus intensity.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
(e–f) Incubation of slices with selegiline (100 mM, 2 h) has a similar effect with its oral
administration in APP/PS1 mice (13 months of age).
(e) Example traces in APP/PS1 mice at 300 mA stimulation, incubation of slices with or
without selegiline.
(f) Summary graph of spike probability in APP/PS1 mice versus stimulus intensity.
EPSP: excitatory post-synaptic potential, Probabilitymax: maximum probability, ES50: 50%
effective stimulus. n refers to the number of cells analyzed. N refers to the number of animals
studied. Data are means ± SEM (error bars).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Day 15 Day 29Day 1
Handling
Hidden platform
Spatial cues
Releasing points
SFig 7E
sca
pe
la
ten
cy (
s)
10
20
30
40
60
1
Training day2 3 4 5 6
● Wild-type + water● Wild-type + selegiline● APP/PS1 + water● APP/PS1 + selegiline
50
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sw
im s
peed (
cm
s-1
)
0
10
20
30
● Wild-type + water● Wild-type + selegiline● APP/PS1 + water● APP/PS1 + selegiline
1
Training day2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
a b
c d
e
Tim
e s
pen
t in
qua
dra
nts
(%
)
0
10
20
30
50
Target
● Wild-type + water● Wild-type + selegiline● APP/PS1 + water● APP/PS1 + selegiline40
Right Left Opposite
f
Ta
rge
t cro
ssin
g n
um
ber
0
2
4
6
8 4 7 4
Water Sele Water Sele
Wild-type APP/PS1
Sw
im s
pee
d (
cm
s-1
)
0
10
20
30
8 4 7 4
Water Sele Water Sele
Wild-type APP/PS1
g
8 4 7 4
Acquisition Acquisition
1st probe test 1st probe test 1st probe test
h
Tim
e s
pen
t in
qua
dra
nts
(%
)
0
10
20
30
50
Target
● Wild-type + water● Wild-type + selegiline● APP/PS1 + water● APP/PS1 + selegiline40
Right Left Opposite
i
Ta
rge
t cro
ssin
g n
um
ber
0
2
4
6
8 4 7 4
Water Sele Water Sele
Wild-type APP/PS1
Sw
im s
pee
d (
cm
s-1
)
0
10
20
30
8 4 7 4
Water Sele Water Sele
Wild-type APP/PS1
j
8 4 7 4
2nd probe test 2nd probe test 2nd probe test
* ****NS
Day 23
Supplementary Figure 7. Morris water maze experiment for testing learning and
memory in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice treated or non-treated with selegiline.
(a–b) Experimental protocol for Morris water maze test for wild-type and APP/PS1 mice
with or without oral administration of selegiline (both sexes at 10–12 months of age). After
selegiline administration (10 mg kg-1
day-1
for 14 days), mice were released in a Morris water
maze with a hidden platform and spatial cues. Acquisition is tested by 4 trials day-1
for 14
days. Probe test was done on the 23th
and 29th
day in the absence of the platform.
(c) Escape latency during acquisition test.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
(d) Swimming speed during acquisition test.
(e) Time spent in each quadrant during 1st probe test.
(f) Target crossing number during 1st
probe test.
(g) Swimming speed during 1st probe test.
(h) Time spent in each quadrant during 2nd
probe test.
(i) Target crossing number during 2nd
probe test.
(j) Swimming speed during 2nd
probe test.
For escape latency, two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc
analysis revealed significant effects for the genotype [F(1,88) = 35.977, P = 0.000], no drug
effect, and significant interaction effect between genotype and drug [F(1,88) = 9.411, P =
0.003]. **
P < 0.01, ***
P < 0.001, NS
P > 0.05. Difference in swim speeds and probe test results
among groups are not significant. Number on each bar refers to the number of mice (e–j)
analyzed. Data are means ± SEM (error bars).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
b
a
Reactive astrocyte
(c) MAOB
(a) Ab plaque
(b) Putrescine
GABAAR
GABABR
Pre
(e) BEST1
Post
GABA release
(f) GABAR
(d) GABA
GABA from reactive astrocytes
Decrease in presynaptic release (PP-DG synapse)
Impairment in spike probability and synaptic plasticity
Learning and memory impairment
Cl–
Synapse
SFig 8
Supplementary Figure 8. Model diagram of memory impairment in AD.
In AD, astrocytes near Ab plaques (a) have more putrescine (b). Putrescine is degraded by
MAOB (c) to produce the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA (d). GABA is then abnormally
released via BEST1 (e) which is redistributed away from microdomains. Then the released
GABA binds to extrasynaptic GABAA and GABAB receptors (f) and strongly inhibits
presynaptic release and spike probability. Consequently, granule cells of the dentate gyrus
receive less glutamatergic inputs at perforant path synapses and show reduced synaptic
plasticity. This finally leads to memory impairment in Alzheimer disease.
Pre: presynaptic terminal, Post: postsynapse, NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor,
AMPAR: -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate receptor.
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
c
d
a bContralateral Stab wound injury Contralateral Stab wound injury
30 mm
Gfap
GABA
NeuN
CA1 Py
SR
Mergee
Inte
nsity o
f
Gfa
p(A
U) 30
20
0
40
Cont Injury
6 5
*
Inte
nsity o
f G
AB
A
In G
fap
+p
ixe
ls (
AU
)
2,000
1,000
0
3,000
Cont Injury
6 5
***
Inte
nsity o
f
neu
ron
al G
AB
A (
AU
)
100
50
0
150
Cont Injury
40 25
NS
10
SFig 9
Supplementary Figure 9. GABA in the reactive astrocytes which is induced by stab
wound injury in the CA1 of hippocampus.
(a) Target site for stab wound injury. Stab wounds were stereotaxically introduced into the
hippocampus (blue arrow). CA1 region adjacent to the injured site (red box) and contralateral
non-injured site was observed (N = 3 for each group; males at 10 weeks of age)
(b) Representative confocal images for stab wound injury and the contralateral site.
(c) Mean intensity of Gfap. *P < 0.05.
(d) Mean intensity of GABA in Gfap-positive area. ***
P < 0.001.
(e) Mean intensity of interneuronal GABA. NS
P > 0.05.
AU: arbitrary unit. Number on each bar refers to the number of slices (c, d) or cells (e)
analyzed. N refers to the number of animals studied. Data are means ± SEM (error bars).
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Supplementary Table 1. 50% effective stimulus (ES50), maximum spike probability
(Probabilitymax), resting membrane potential (RMP), and input resistance (Rinput) of
granule cells (n refers to the number of granule cells recorded).
GenotypeOral
administrationBath application n ES50 (mA) ± SEM Probabilitymax ± SEM
Wild-type Water 18 229.482 ± 1.470 0.989 ± 0.008
Selegiline 15 197.288 ± 0.752 0.993 ± 0.007
APP/PS1 Water 21 415.956 ± 6.651 0.638 ± 0.098
Selegiline 23 227.438 ± 4.795 0.974 ± 0.018
Wild-type Water before 8 220.853 ± 7.375 0.983 ± 0.011
+BIC,CGP 8 159.374 ± 1.625 1.000 ± 0.000
Selegiline before 15 231.155 ± 4.544 0.993 ± 0.007
+BIC,CGP 15 187.384 ± 7.309 1.000 ± 0.000
APP/PS1 Water before 15 415.093 ± 4.570 0.713 ± 0.112
+BIC,CGP 15 269.059 ± 4.171 1.000 ± 0.000
Selegiline before 11 206.270 ± 0.874 0.973 ± 0.027
+BIC,CGP 11 177.490 ± 0.008 1.000 ± 0.000
GenotypeOral
administrationBath application RMP (mV) ± SEM RInput (MW) ± SEM
Wild-type Water 29 -79.379 ± 1.130 284.724 ± 19.205
Selegiline 18 -81.500 ± 0.085 295.444 ± 32.218
APP/PS1 Water 21 -79.238 ± 1.494 315.381 ± 24.593
Selegiline 23 -80.652 ± 0.732 323.522 ± 18.745
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Supplementary Table 2. Detailed information for statistical analysis of behavioral
test results.
Behavior tests Result from statistical analysis
Passive avoidance test
Two-way repeated measures ANOVA (at the 0.05 level)
Genotype effect: F(1,42) = 18.630, P = 0.000
Drug effect: F(1,42) = 12.494, P = 0.001
Genotype Drug interaction: not significant
One-way repeated measures ANOVA
F(3,42) = 14.060, P = 0.000
Scheffe's post hoc analysis:
WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.000
WT + selegiline vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.000
APP/PS1+water vs. APP/PS1 + selegiline, P = 0.023
One-way ANOVA with Scheffe's post hoc analysis (for each day)
Day 1 : WT + water vs. WT + selegiline, P = 0.004
WT + selegiline vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.042
WT + selegiline vs. APP/PS1 + selegiline, P = 0.043
Day 2 : WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.000
WT + selegiline vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.000
APP/PS1 + water vs. APP/PS1 + selegiline, P =0.013
Morris water maze test
Two-way repeated measures ANOVA
Genotype effect: F(1,88) = 35.977, P = 0.000
Drug effect: not significant
Genotype Drug interaction: F(1,88) = 9.411, P = 0.003
One-way repeated measures ANOVA
F(3, 88) = 21.468, P = 0.000
Scheffe's post hoc analysis:
WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.000
WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + selegiline, P = 0.034
WT + selegiline vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.000
APP/PS1 + water vs. APP/PS1 + selegiline, P = 0.012
One-way ANOVA with Scheffe's post hoc analysis (for each day)
Day 1–6: not significant
Day 7: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.048
Day 8: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.033
Day 9: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.015
Day 10: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.013
Day 11: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.402
Day 12: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P = 0.004
Day 13: WT + water vs. APP/PS1 + water, P =0.004
Day 14: not significant
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639
Supplementary Table 3. Human tissue information for control subjects and subjects
with Alzheimer disease.
Case Age Sex Braak stage Cause of death
Control 1 87 F I Unknown
Control 2 88 M I Adenocarcinoma
Control 3 86 M II Unknown
Control 4 87 F II Unknown
Control 5 67 M I Sudden accidental death
Control 6 82 M I Colon cancer
Control 7 61 M I Unknown
Control 8 101 F I Myocardial infarction
Control 9 89 M III Renal failure
Control 10 68 M I Congestive heart failure
Control 11 78 F I Unknown
AD 1 82 M V AD
AD 2 79 F VI AD
AD 3 70 M VI AD
AD 4 59 M VI AD
AD 5 80 F V AD
AD 6 92 M V AD
AD 7 90 F V AD
AD 8 100 M V AD
AD 9 75 M V AD
AD 10 83 M VI AD
AD 11 79 F VI AD
Nature Medicine doi:10.1038/nm.3639