12
1 08-PANH- 06 Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHY Tâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3 Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011 Id 165 : HELIUM RELEASE IN A CLOSED ENCLOSURE: COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIMPLE MODELS, CFD CALCULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Gilles Bernard- Michel Benjamin Cariteau

Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

  • Upload
    becka

  • View
    47

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Id 165 : HELIUM RELEASE IN A CLOSED ENCLOSURE: COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIMPLE MODELS, CFD CALCULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS. Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau. Context and objectives. A benchmark (Air liquide, INERIS, PSA, CEA): - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

1

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Id 165 : HELIUM RELEASE IN A CLOSED ENCLOSURE: COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIMPLE MODELS, CFD CALCULATIONS

AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

Id 165 : HELIUM RELEASE IN A CLOSED ENCLOSURE: COMPARISONS BETWEEN SIMPLE MODELS, CFD CALCULATIONS

AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

Gilles Bernard-MichelBenjamin Cariteau

Page 2: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

2

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

• A benchmark (Air liquide, INERIS, PSA, CEA): • This work takes place in a benchmark (Dimithry ANR project)• Code comparisons : FLUENT, FLACS, PHOENIX, CAST3M• CFD Vs experimental results comparisons (GAMELAN exp. Set-up).

• Physical model validation :• Turbulence : K-epsilon, LES, laminar, for what injection flux and diameter etc…• Compressibility : Boussinesq, Low Mach, Fully compressible ?

• Numerical discretization validation :• 1st or 2nd order time scheme ? • Explicite/ implicite, what terms of the equation ? For what purpose • Centered or upwind scheme for convection• Qualitiy of the mesh, convergence

• Simple models validation :• Worster and Hupper model works fine for 20 mm diameter injection with a

5Nl/min source, and under predict by a factor 2 helium concentrations fot a 5 mm diameter.

=> Need for a better understanding of the phenomenon which is not accessible with experiments/

Context and objectives

Page 3: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

3

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Experimental set-up

We only present two cases :-A closed box - 5mm diam. injection nozzle - 5Nl/min helium injection – jet/plume- A closed box - 20 mm diam. injection nozzle - 5 Nl/min helium injection – plume- High injection rate (jets) are not interesting because helium concentration is rapidely homogeneous.

Page 4: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

4

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

• Non costy calculations => geometrical simplifications•Highly converged calculations => EF order 3, and BDF2 time discretization scheme.• L.E.S for turbulence

Modeling stategy

• Numerical cost reduction strategy :• Explicite convection• Constant time step by blocs• Algebraic projection method• => constant matrix for pressure discretization• Parallel direct solver for pressure equation• Parallel iterative solver for velocity, concentration equations(ILU0 precond, conjugate gradient).

Page 5: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

5

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Conservation Equations

Page 6: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

6

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Discretization Grids

time steps :• dt lower than 10 times CFL condition• dt around 5 ms for the 5mm injection• dt around 25 ms fot the 20mm injection.

Page 7: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

7

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Qualitative results

Page 8: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

8

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Reversal vortex is observed :

=> Confirms the theory predicting coexistence of stratification and homogeneous layer.

Reversal vortex

Page 9: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

9

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Time concentration profile – 5mm case

Page 10: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

10

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Time concentration profile – 20mm case

Page 11: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

11

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

Codes results are more diffusive :- More stratification- Almost no homogeneous layer at the top.

Vertical concentration profile – 20mm case

Page 12: Gilles Bernard-Michel Benjamin Cariteau

12

08-PANH-06

Réunion : Avancement DIMITRHYTâche II : Mitigation des ATEX… Sous-tâche II.3Lieu: Carrières sous Poissy date : 23 juin 2011

• The model is accurate enough :• To predict concentration maxima better than 10% and

consequently the problems with Worster an Hupper model for the 5mm low injection rate case.

• To predict the reversal vortex• To predict correct concentration profiles

Conclusions and perpectives

• We will go for 3D modeling :• Discretization scheme and grids are validated• Solvers are fast enough to move to 3D• We expect to model correctly enough the jet to understand

what can be improved in the Worster and Hupper model.