4
VOLUME 80, NUMBER 11 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 16 MARCH 1998 Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows Pierre Le Doussal 1 and Kay Jörg Wiese 2 1 CNRS-Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris, France* 2 Fachbereich Physik, Universität GH Essen, 45117 Essen, Germany (Received 15 August 1997) We study the dynamics of polymers and elastic manifolds in nonpotential static random flows. Barriers are found to be generated from combined effects of elasticity, disorder, and thermal fluctuations. This leads to glassy trapping even in pure barrier-free divergenceless flows, with anomalously small response to an applied force. We find a new renormalization-group fixed point at finite temperature and compute the roughness, dynamical, and response exponents for directed and isotropic manifolds. [S0031-9007(98)05374-5] PACS numbers: 64.60.Ak, 05.40. + j, 74.60.Ge, 82.35. + t There is a lot of current interest in nonequilibrium dy- namics, ranging from the growth of domains of an ordered phase to driven dynamics of systems with broken symme- tries [1]. Additional quenched disorder usually leads to much slower dynamics [2]. The competition between the elasticity arising from the internal order, and the quenched disorder gives rise to complex phenomena such as pin- ning and glassy behavior with ultraslow dynamics and an anomalously small response to external perturbations. This happens in many experimental systems such as vortex lattices in superconductors, random magnets, and charge density waves [3]. Up to now the study of pinning and glassy dynamics has focused on potential systems [4,5], typically an elastic manifold in a random potential [3,6]. However, in many situations it is important to study nonpo- tential dynamics in the presence of disorder, such as driven systems on disordered substrates [7] or domain growth in the presence of shear [8]. One then expects interesting new physics from the competition between, on one hand, dis- order and elasticity, which tend to create pinned or frozen states, and, on the other hand, the energy pumped into the system which tends to destroy glassy properties. Indeed, the existence of pinning and barriers in nonpotential sys- tems was proposed recently in the context of driven vortex lattices [7]. Related observations were made in (mostly mean field) models [9,10]. Since little is known about non- potential systems with disorder [11], it is of great interest to study other examples. An outstanding question is whether the effective temperature generated from the constant dis- sipation does overwhelm static disorder. In this Letter, we study a model of a polymer in a nonpo- tential static random flow (a “randomly driven polymer”) and its generalization to an elastic manifold. We work di- rectly in finite dimension using a dynamical renormaliza- tion group (RG). We study two cases: either the polymer is directed (each monomer sees a different flow) or it is isotropic (all monomers are in the same flow); see Fig. 1. Our main finding is that the physics is described by new RG fixed points with both T . 0 and finite disorder, lead- ing to anomalous roughness z and glassy trapping by the flow [with sublinear ys f d, f f ]. Compared to the single particle studies [12], new features emerge such as the cru- cial role of internal elasticity in generating barriers. While being consistent with the Hartree results sd ! `d for long range (LR) disorder [10], our present study yields new uni- versal fixed points for short range (SR) disorder. It also generalizes the dynamics of self-avoiding manifolds [13] to a quenched disorder situation, although self-avoidance is perturbatively less relevant in most regimes studied here. For real polymers, or gels, in realistic flows ours is mostly a toy model which could be improved by including hydrody- namic forces. Nevertheless, some of the physics unveiled here will be present in more realistic situations, such as the existence of preferred regions in the flows. Inhomo- geneities in polymer distribution and nonlinearities in ys f d can be investigated experimentally. Let us illustrate how elasticity leads to a dynamical generation of barriers in a divergenceless flow. It is well known that for a single particle convected in such a flow, the stationary measure at T . 0 is spatially uniform and the drift velocity under an applied force is y f . Remarkably as soon as one considers two coupled particles, preferred regions appear, e.g., in the 2d flow, z 1 csz 2 2 z 1 d 1 i sv1ddz 1 1h 1 , z 2 csz 1 2 z 2 d 1 i sv2ddz 2 1h 2 , (1) z k x k 1 iy k is the complex position of particle k, c is the elastic coupling, and kh i h p j l 4T d ij is the ther- mal noise. Without disorder, d 0, the motion is just FIG. 1. (a) Directed polymer; (b) isotropic chain. 2362 0031-9007y 98y 80(11) y2362(4)$15.00 © 1998 The American Physical Society

Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows

VOLUME 80, NUMBER 11 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S 16 MARCH 1998

nce

2362

Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows

Pierre Le Doussal1 and Kay Jörg Wiese21CNRS-Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris, Fra*

2Fachbereich Physik, Universität GH Essen, 45117 Essen, Germany(Received 15 August 1997)

We study the dynamics of polymers and elastic manifolds in nonpotential static random flows.Barriers are found to be generated from combined effects of elasticity, disorder, and thermal fluctuations.This leads to glassy trapping even in pure barrier-free divergenceless flows, with anomalously smallresponse to an applied force. We find a new renormalization-group fixed point at finite temperatureand compute the roughness, dynamical, and response exponents for directed and isotropic manifolds.[S0031-9007(98)05374-5]

PACS numbers: 64.60.Ak, 05.40.+j, 74.60.Ge, 82.35.+ t

ru-

i-o]cere.a-eds-

lsa

ed

There is a lot of current interest in nonequilibrium dynamics, ranging from the growth of domains of an orderphase to driven dynamics of systems with broken symmtries [1]. Additional quenched disorder usually leadsmuch slower dynamics [2]. The competition between telasticity arising from the internal order, and the quenchdisorder gives rise to complex phenomena such as pning and glassy behavior with ultraslow dynamics anan anomalously small response to external perturbatioThis happens in many experimental systems such as volattices in superconductors, random magnets, and chadensity waves [3]. Up to now the study of pinning anglassy dynamics has focused onpotential systems [4,5],typically an elastic manifold in a random potential [3,6However, in many situations it is important to studynonpo-tentialdynamics in the presence of disorder, such as drivsystems on disordered substrates [7] or domain growththe presence of shear [8]. One then expects interestingphysics from the competition between, on one hand, dorder and elasticity, which tend to create pinned or frozstates, and, on the other hand, the energy pumped intosystem which tends to destroy glassy properties. Indethe existence of pinning and barriers in nonpotential sytems was proposed recently in the context of driven vortlattices [7]. Related observations were made in (mosmean field) models [9,10]. Since little is known about nopotential systems with disorder [11], it is of great intereststudy other examples. An outstanding question is whetthe effective temperature generated from the constantsipation does overwhelm static disorder.

In this Letter, we study a model of a polymer in a nonptential static random flow (a “randomly driven polymer”and its generalization to an elastic manifold. We work drectly in finite dimension using a dynamical renormaliztion group (RG). We study two cases: either the polymis directed (each monomer sees a different flow) or itisotropic (all monomers are in the same flow); see Fig.Our main finding is that the physics is described by neRG fixed points with bothT . 0 and finite disorder, lead-ing to anomalous roughnessz and glassy trapping by theflow [with sublinearys fd , ff]. Compared to the single

0031-9007y98y80(11)y2362(4)$15.00

-ede-

toheedin-dns.rtexrged

].

enin

newis-enthe

ed,s-extlyn-toherdis-

o-)i-

a-eris1.w

particle studies [12], new features emerge such as the ccial role of internal elasticity in generating barriers. Whilebeing consistent with the Hartree resultssd ! `d for longrange (LR) disorder [10], our present study yields new unversal fixed points for short range (SR) disorder. It alsgeneralizes the dynamics of self-avoiding manifolds [13to a quenched disorder situation, although self-avoidanis perturbatively less relevant in most regimes studied heFor real polymers, or gels, in realistic flows ours is mostlytoy model which could be improved by including hydrodynamic forces. Nevertheless, some of the physics unveilhere will be present in more realistic situations, such athe existence of preferred regions in the flows. Inhomogeneities in polymer distribution and nonlinearities inys fdcan be investigated experimentally.

Let us illustrate how elasticity leads to a dynamicageneration of barriers in a divergenceless flow. It iwell known that for a single particle convected in suchflow, the stationary measure atT . 0 is spatially uniformand the drift velocity under an applied force isy ­f. Remarkably as soon as one considers two couplparticles, preferred regions appear, e.g., in the2d flow,

Ùz1 ­ csz2 2 z1d 1 isv 1 ddz1 1 h1 ,

Ùz2 ­ csz1 2 z2d 1 isv 2 ddz2 1 h2 ,(1)

zk ­ xk 1 iyk is the complex position of particlek, cis the elastic coupling, andkhih

pj l ­ 4Tdij is the ther-

mal noise. Without disorder,d ­ 0, the motion is just

FIG. 1. (a) Directed polymer; (b) isotropic chain.

© 1998 The American Physical Society

Page 2: Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows

VOLUME 80, NUMBER 11 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S 16 MARCH 1998

.-

-

n

a collective rotation around the center (the matrix eigevalues areiv and 22c 1 iv). At T . 0 there is freecollective diffusion andy ­ f as before. As soon asd . 0 the zero mode disappears and the two particlconverge towards the center (the eigenvalues arel6 ­2c 1 iv 6

pc2 2 d2). This effect persists atT . 0

since one findskjzkj2l ­ 2T sc2 1 d2dyscd2d sk ­ 1, 2d,and thus there is a genuine bound state despite the divgenceless nature of the flow. The stationary conformtion is twisted sincekz1zp

2 l ­ 2T sc 1 iddyd2. Extending(1) to a directed chain, one finds similar results (the dcay towards the center atT ­ 0 is exactly the problemof spin depolarization [14]). Thus a directed polymer ia flow will be attracted to regions where elastic energand dissipation are smaller (though the precise balancemains to be understood). Presumably polymers in realisflows will be repulsed by high vorticity regions. Nonlin-ear extensions of (1) will thus show the generation of bariers. Similar effects exist if all monomers see the samflow (isotropic chain), reminiscent of the effect discovereby Thual and Fauve [15]; mapping their Landau-Ginsbufunction onto the complex positionzsxd of an elastic chainin a 2d nonpotential nonlinear flow, one sees that (evenT ­ 0) it may converge to stable localized (rotating antwisted) conformationszsx, td ! z0sxdeivt .

We now turn to our full disordered model where theseffects can be studied quantitatively. We considermanifold of internal dimensionD parametrized by ad-component fieldrasxd. The polymer corresponds toD ­ 1 (x labels the monomers), and a single particleD ­ 0. We study the Langevin dynamics

h≠traxt ­ c=2

xraxt 1 Fafrxt , xg 1 z a

xt . (2)h is the friction,c the elastic coefficient, and the Gaussian thermal noise iskz a

xt zbx0t0l ­ 2hTdabdst 2 t0ddDsx 2

x0d. k· · ·l denote thermal and the overbar denotes disordaverages.Fafr , xg is a Gaussian quenched random forcfield of correlations

Fafr , xgFbfr 0, x0g ­ Dabsr 2 r 0dhx2x0 . (3)There are two main cases of interest. If the manifolddirected(e.g., a polymer oriented by an external field), thehx2x0 ­ dDsx 2 x0d. If the manifold is isotropic (e.g.,a Gaussian chain in a static flow), the force field doenot depend on the internal coordinateFafr , xg ­ Fafrgand hx2x0 ­ 1. We consider a statistically rotationallyinvariant force field with both a potentialsLd (“electric”)and a divergence-freesTd part (“magnetic”). We thusstudy correlatorsDabsrd ­

RK D

abK eiK?r with, at smallK

DabK , Ka2d

∑gL

KaKb

K21 gT

µdab 2

KaKb

K2

∂∏, (4)

withR

K ­R ddK

s2pdd . We are mostly interested inSR corre-lated forcesa ­ d (force correlator decaying faster thanr2d). We also give results forLR correlated forces(forcecorrelator decaying asr2a with a , d ). Note thatSRrandom potentialsDabsKd , gLKaKb 1 gT sdabK2 2

KaKbd (formally a . d ) renormalize to the random force

n-

es

er-a-

e-

nyre-tic

r-e

drg

atd

ea

to

-

ere

isn

s

case, except in the potential casegT ­ 0, much studiedpreviously [3,6] which is preserved by RG.

We study the time translational invariant steady stateOne defines the radius of gyration (or roughness) exponentksrxt 2 rx0td2l , jx 2 x0j2z , the single monomer dif-fusion exponentksrxt 2 rxt0d2l , jt 2 t0j2n, and assumesscaling behaviorksrxt 2 r00d2l , jxj2z Bstyxzd with z ­zn. The drift velocity under a small additional appliedforcef in (2) is y , krxtlyt. We findy , ff at smallf,with f . 1, and thus the polymer is trapped by the flow.Without disorder one hasz0 ­ s2 2 Ddy2, n0 ­ s2 2

Ddy4 for D , 2, and bounded fluctuations forD . 2.We start with simple Flory (i.e., dimensional) estimates.

Balancing all terms in (2) (e.g., for directed manifolds itreadsryt , ryx2 , r2dy2x2Dy2) yields

z dirF ­ 2ndir

F ­4 2 D2 1 d

(5)

for directed and isotropic manifolds, respectively (withd ! a for LR disorder). This suggests that the manifoldwill be stretched by disorder [16]. We now study (2)and (3) using the dynamical generating functionalZ ­R

Dr Dr e2S0fr ,rg2Sintfr ,rg1ifr with

S0 ­Z

dDx dt iraxtsh≠t 2 c=2

xdraxt 2 hTira

xt iraxt ,

Sint ­ 212

Zx,x0,t,t0

siraxtd sir

bx0t0dDabsrxt 2 rx0t0dhx2x0 .

(6)

We used dynamical RG methods, both via a WilsonRG scheme (presented here) as in [7,17] and via multilocal operator product expansion as in [13,18] (detailed in[19]). The free propagator isBsx, td ­ 1

2d ksrxt 2 r00d2l0,and the free response function isRsx, td ­ 1

d kir00 ? rxtl0.Equations (6) and (4) is invariant under the rescalingx ­e0t0, t ­ ezlt0, r ­ ez lr 0, r ­ es22z2z 2D1bdl r 0, providedh ! hes22z1bdl , T ! Tes22D22z1bdl , c ! cebl. AlsogT ,L ! gT ,Lef42D12b2sa12dz gl (directed case) andgT ,L !

gT ,Lef412b2sa12dzgl (isotropic case) witha ­ d every-where for SR forces. There are genericallythreeindepen-dent exponentssz, z , bd and from them one gets

n ­ zyz, f ­ sz 2 z dys2 2 z 1 bd , (7)using f ! fesD1z1adl , y ! yesz 2zdl . Power countingat the Gaussian fixed point with no disorder [z ­ 2,b ­ 0, z ­ s2 2 Ddy2] shows that disorder is relevantwhen (Fig. 2)d , ddir

c ­ 4ys2 2 Dd for directed mani-folds and d , diso

c ­ s4 1 2Ddys2 2 Dd for isotropicmanifolds (a , dc for LR disorder). Thus for directedpolymers disorder is relevant ford , 4 and for isotropicpolymers for d , 6. Power counting and symmetriesshow that the only relevant terms generated in perturbatioare those in (6). To lowest orderT , c, h are corrected as

dT ­sd 2 1dgT

hd

Zt.0,y,K

hyKa2d

3 fe2K2Bs y,td 2 e2K2B` g , (8)

dc ­gL

2dD

Zy,K

y2hyKa2dfe2K2Bs y,0d 2 e2K2B` g ,

2363

Page 3: Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows

VOLUME 80, NUMBER 11 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S 16 MARCH 1998

s erTof

andsd 2 1ddh ­ s gLygT dhdT [20]. These expressionwere simplified using the fluctuation dissipation theore(FDT) relationustd d

dt Bsx, td ­ TRsx, td. A useful featureof the present model is that, although the FDT relation

2364

m

is

not obeyed by the exact Green’s functions (since disordis nonpotential), it is within each scale of the RG. The FDviolation simply appears as a nontrivial renormalizationT . The relevant corrections to disorder read

dDabP ­

Zx,y,t,t 0

ZK ,K 0­P2K

fDabK sK ? DK 0 ? Kd 1 sK 0 ? Da

Kd sK ? DbK 0dgRx,tRy,t0 hx2yeK?K 0sBx,t1By,t0 d. (9)

e

ic

The smallP expansion in (9) is well behaved and becausof analyticity the only divergent terms generated are prportional todab yielding dgL ­ dgT . One can thus takethe limit P ! 0 [K 0 ­ 2K in (9)]. One checks explic-itly from (9) that (i) starting withDabsKd , gLKaKb 1

gT sdabK2 2 KaKbd with both gT . 0 and gL . 0 onegenerates SR random forces, and that (ii) a divergence-frandom force field does not remain so. The RG equatio(specified to various cases below and in Table I) read

dccdl

­ b 1 AcgL,dh

hdl­ 2 2 z 1 b 1 AhgL ,

dTTdl

­ 2 2 D 2 2z 1 b 1 AT gT ,

dgL

dl­ egL 2 sB 2 Ad gLgT 1 Eg2

L ,(10)

dgT

dl­ egT 1 sA 1 Ed gLgT 2 Bg2

T .

(i) Directed manifolds, SR disorder.—e ­ 2 2 s2 2

Dd d2 . Thenhy ­ dDs yd, and there is no correction to the

elastic coefficientdc ­ 0 (guaranteed by the statistical tiltsymmetry [7] for SR and LR disorder). Thusb ­ 0 andthere are only two independent exponents. The dimensioless coupling [21] constant isgT ,L ­ CLegT ,LyT sd12dy2.The RG flow is depicted in Fig. 3. There is a globally attractive isotropic fixed pointIp at gL ­ gT ­ eysB 2 Ad(note thatB . A) and the linegL ­ gT is preserved. Thepotential linegT ­ 0 is preserved with a flow to strongcoupling. There is anotherapparentfixed point atgL ­ 0,

FIG. 2. Regions in thesd, Dd plane where SR disorder isrelevant for a directed manifold. Inset: Regions insa, dd whereSR or LR disorder is relevant for directed polymersD ­ 1.

eo-

reens

n-

-

gT ­ eyB, attractive along the linegL ­ 0 (divergence-less flows). However, forD . 0, this line is not in thephysical domain since, as discussed above, a finitegL termis generated and one flows toIp. At Ip one gets

z ­ 2 1 eyaDp , z ­2 2 D

21 eys2bDp d ,

bD ­4 2 D2 2 D

24D

µ1

2GfDy2g

∂2ys22Dd,

(11)

aD ­21D22D bD, and n and f using (7) [22]. The ex-

pansion can be carried from any point of the lindp ­ 4ys2 2 Dpd. Optimizing overDp as in [18] yieldsthe estimates z ­ 0.625 6 0.02, z ­ 2.085 6 0.02,f ­ 1.061 6 0.015, sd ­ 3d and z ­ 0.9 6 0.1,z ­ 2.2 6 0.1, f ­ 1.182 6 0.08 sd ­ 2d. For small ,z . zF and Flory is thus likely to be a lower bound [23].

(ii) Directed manifolds, LR disorder.—e ­ 2 2s22Dda

2 with a , d. The novelty isdgL,R ­ 0 since theLR part of the disorder is not renormalized [24]. Thedimensionless coupling [21]gL,T ­ CgL,T yT sa12dy2 willexperience nontrivial renormalization only becauseTrenormalizes. Thus the ratiogLsld

gT sld ­ gL

gTis preserved which

leads to aline of fixed points. ThusgT sld ! gpT ­ eyB

andgLsld !gL

gTgp

T . This yields the continuously varyingexponentz ­ 2 1 2 gL

gT

e

s21ad sd21d , and z ­ zF holds toall orders in in the LR case since neither the vertex norcrenormalize. As conjectured in [10],n is found identicalto the Hartree approximation [formula (12) [25] of [10] ].

(iii) Isotropic manifolds (SR and LR disorder).—Thene ­ D 1 2 2 a

22D2 (a ­ d for SR disorder). The nov-

elty is a renormalization of the elasticity of the manifold(it becomes stifferdc . 0) and thus a third nontrivialexponent b. The dimensionless constant isgT ,L ­C

gT ,L

T s21ady2cs22ady2 . For SR disorder the RG flow is similar tothe directed case. There is a fully attractive (isotrop

TABLE I. Coefficients of (10). One must setd ­ dp,D ­ Dp. One denotesIa ­

R1`

0 dt Bs1, td2ay2 with Bs1, td ­1

GfDy2g hs4tds22Ddy2e21ys4td 1 Gf D2 , 1

4t gj with Id­6 ø 1.7935.

Ac Ah AT B E A

dirSR 0 2d

2sd21dd

d122 AT 0 16psd21d

dsd22d s22Dd s SD4p ddy2

dirLR 0 2d

2sd21dd

a122 AT 0 0

isoSR 12dD

Id

dsd21dId

dd12

2 ATd22

2 Ac2sd21dGf D

22Dg2

dsd22d s22Dd2Gf 2D22D

gisoLR 1

2dDIad

sd21dIa

da12

2 ATa22

2 Ac 0

Page 4: Glassy Trapping of Manifolds in Nonpotential Random Flows

VOLUME 80, NUMBER 11 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S 16 MARCH 1998

-

i,

.

v.

e

rt).

t

d

e

]

y,te

FIG. 3. RG flows (a) directed manifolds with SR disordeThe physics is controlled by a fixed pointIp at gT ­ gL.(b) Isotropic manifolds LR disorder. The flow is along straiglines, with a line of fixed pointsL and an apparent separatrixz 2 z0 changes sign suggesting progressive localization.

disorder) fixed pointIp at gT ­ gL ­ 1ysB 2 E 2 Ad.As before, LR disorder is not renormalized, the flolines are gLsld

gT sld ­gL

gT­ k, and there is a line of fixed

points gT ­ eysB 2 kEd, gL ­ kgT parametrizedby k. The general formula for the exponent isz ­s2 2 Ddy2 1 esAT 2 kAcdy2sB 2 kE 2 Ad, z ­ 2 1

kesAh 2 AcdysB 2 kE 2 Ad, and b ­ 2keAcysB 2

kE 2 Ad, with the values given in Table I (and sek ­ 1 for SR). For SR disorder this yields forD ­ 1,z ­ 0.5 1 0.13e, z ­ 2 1 0.04e, b ­ 20.015e.Extrapolations as in [18] suggestz ­ 0.85 6 0.1,z ­ 2.1 6 0.1, b ­ 20.025 6 0.01 for polymers ind ­ 3. For LR disorder the line of fixed points is noparallel to the axis any more (Fig. 3), and there isnofixed point for k . kc ­ ByE. There is even a valuekp ­

a22a12 kc , kc, where z 2 z0 changes sign. For

kp , k , kc the localization effects dominate. Togethwith the apparent separatrix in the flow, this suggetwo phases (a localized one and one with a continuouvarying z ), which would be interesting to check bnonperturbative methods (as in [10]).

Thus elastic manifolds in static random flows are dscribed by new RG fixed points at finite disorder. Theare similarities with the glass phase of manifolds in radompotentials[3,6], such as sublinearys fd response andanomalous roughness. The main difference is that ha temperature is generated, which weakens disorder[and renders the fixed point perturbatively accessiblethe coupling isgyT sd12dy2]. Numerical simulations wouldalso help to check present results and further investigthis new type of glassy behavior [27] and its consequenfor experimental systems such as polymers or gels in stflows. A competition between localization and driving wfound for isotropic manifolds (correlated disorder).

We thank D. Bonn, L. Cugliandolo, J. KurchanT. Giamarchi, L. Schäfer, and H. Tanaka for discussion

*Laboratoire propre associé à l’ENS et à Univ. Paris-Su[1] A. J. Bray, Adv. Phys.43, 357 (1994).[2] See, e.g., S. R. Anderson, Phys. Rev. B36, 8435 (1987).

r.

ht.

w

t

t

erstsslyy

e-ren-

ere[26]—

atecesaticas

,s.

d.

[3] G. Blatteret al., Rev. Mod. Phys.66, 1125 (1994).[4] Or Hamiltonian systems (which have similar properties).[5] U. Ebert, J. Stat. Phys.82, 183–265 (1996).[6] D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 1964 (1986).[7] T. Giamarchi and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 3408

(1996); Report No. cond-mat/9705096; Report No. condmat/9708085.

[8] A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. A34, 3528 (1986).[9] L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, P. Le Doussal, and L. Pelit

Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 350 (1997).[10] P. Le Doussal, L. F. Cugliandolo, and L. Peliti, Europhys

Lett. 39, 111 (1997).[11] See, e.g., B. Schmittmann and K. E. Bassler, Phys. Re

Lett. 77, 3581 (1996).[12] J. P. Bouchaud, A. Comtet, A. Georges, and P. L

Doussal, J. Phys. (Paris)48, 1445 (1987);49, 369 (1988);J. Honkonen and E. Karjalainen, J. Phys. A21, 4217(1988), and references therein.

[13] K. J. Wiese, Report No. cond-mat/9702020; RepoNo. cond-mat/9702023; Eur. Phys. J. B (to be published

[14] P. P. Mitra and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. B44, 12 035(1991).

[15] O. Thual and S. Fauve, J. Phys. (Paris)49, 1829 (1988).[16] However, z ­ zF is exact only for directed manifolds

with LR correlations with alson ­ nF gL ­ 0 and d !

` sssfor sD ­ 0, gL ­ 0d n ­ nF is alwaysexact [10]ddd.[17] D. Carpentier and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. B55, 12 128

(1997), and references therein.[18] F. David and K. J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4564

(1996); K. J. Wiese and F. David, Nucl. Phys.B487, 529(1997).

[19] K. Wiese and P. Le Doussal (to be published).[20] WhereB` ­ limt!` Bs0, td with both UV (L) and IRsLd

cutoffs (important to recover theT ! 0 limit, or studyD . 4 where disorder is again perturbatively irrelevan[7]). Here we are mostly interested inD , 2, d neardc, LL ! `, and we can set exps2K2B`d ­ 0 and

useBsx, 0d ­ T jxj22D

s22DdSDc , Bs0, td ­ 2T jmtj22Dy2

s22Dd s4pcdDy2 with SD ­2pDy2

GsDy2d andR

K e2K2BKa2d ­ s4pd2dy2 Gfay2gGfdy2g B

2ay2.

[21] We useC ­ Gfay2gGfdy2g s4pda2dy221s 22D

2 day2 and C0 ­ s2 2

Dday2 Gfay2gGfdy2g S

11ay2D s4pd2dy2 with a ­ d for SR disorder.

[22] Continuation to D ­ 0 yields z ­ 1 1e

2 , z ­ 2 1 e

(with e ­ 2 2 d ). This yieldsn ­ z yz ­ 1y2 1 Ose2dand f ­ 1 1 e at Ip which is the correct known resultfor the particle, obtained via a different RG [12].

[23] Elasticity slows diffusion compared to a single particle.[24] Equation (9) renormalizes only the SR part of disorder an

becomes important in the region of thesa, dd plane wherethe crossover [12] LR-SR occurs (not studied here).

[25] Setting g2 !gLd , g1 2 g2 ! s1 2

1d dgT , and e !

e

22D .We have extended the calculation of [10] and obtained thf exponent for Hartree in agreement with (7).

[26] Reminiscent of the “marginal glass” in the statics [17,28with effectively logarithmically growing barriers.

[27] Nonpotential forces could possibly interrupt the hierarchof wells within wells of a static glass at a random levelresulting in broad distributions of release time, or generaLevy walk-type jumps between trapped configurations.

[28] J. Cardy and S. Ostlund, Phys. Rev. B25, 6899 (1982).

2365