12
. , . , , , , . , [ ] . ( ) , Blanc, 1968: 237), 1 ) , , . . , . . , , 2 .( - : :109-75 : ) Its most unusual feature was not that it was 'dead' (a much abused term) and had to 1 be 'artificially revived', but that it was no one's mother tongue, and that there were no speakers of any dialects closely related to it. 2 217

TAUizreel/publications/Emergence_Heb_Teuda... · 2011-09-12 · Blanc, 1968: 237),1) 2.( - : :109-75 : ) Its most unusual feature was not that it was 'dead' (a much abused term) and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • .

    , .

    , ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    [ ] .

    ( )

    ,

    Blanc, 1968: 237),1)

    ,

    , .

    .

    ,

    . .

    , ,

    2 . ( - : : 1 0 9 - 7 5 : )

    Its most unusual feature was not that it was 'dead' (a much abused term) and had to 1 be 'artificially revived', but that it was no one's mother tongue, and that there were no speakers of any dialects closely related to it. 2

    217

    יזרעאל, שלמה. תשס"ב. לתהליכי התהוותה של העברית המדוברת בישראל. בתוך: שלמה יזרעאל (עורך), בסיועה של מרגלית מנדלסון. מדברים עברית: לחקר הלשון המדוברת והשונוּת הלשונית בישראל. (תעודה, יח.) תל אביב: אוניברסיטת תל אביב. תשס"ב. 217-238.

  • ,

    , , .

    .

    . ; Roth, 1 9 3 4 )

    . ( , ; Parfitt; 1950 ,Chomsky, 1972 ; 1984

    ,

    '

    , , - - Revemacularization

    Spoisky, 1995 • )

    ' . ( revitaiization ,199

    , , ,

    , , , .

    .

    .

    . ,

    ,1881

    .

    ,1884 ,

    , , .

    , ( )

    .< - : ; Bar-Adon, 1975: 1 9 )

    , ,

    .

    , :

    ;96 : )

    Bar-Adon, ; W e x l e r , 1975 , ; F e l l m a n , 1973

    . ( 3 - 2 1975

    . 100 ' 156 - . , ,

    . P a r f i t t , 1972: 242-241 , ,

    218

    .(10 : H a g e g e , 2 0 0 0 )

    3 ,

    , ,

    .(317 , )

    ,

    ,

    , 1881 ,

    ,

    .

    .

    . ( P a t t e r s o n : 308 -30 6 : 1982 ,Kutscher, 1 9 6 2 )

    , , , ,

    . ( S i m o n , 1920: 1 3 2 ) ,

    1918-1916 . ( O m a n , 1984: 2 4 5 - 2 4 3 )

    75%

    ,

    . ( [ ] : - )

    ,

    ! , )

    — , . ( 4 . —

    .

    ,

    Pourtant, la r6surrection de i'h6breu israelien n'a pas £t£ une cevre veritablement 3 planifiee. (10 : B a r - A d o n , 1 9 7 5 ) 4 , ( G i v o n , 1979: 3 2 ) . : / , / ) . (5.1.3

    .

    219

  • , .

    ,

    .( , , , ; 1.1 : Wexier, 1 9 9 0 )

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    ; [37-15 : ] , , )

    . , — .(

    :

    : ! Blau, 1978 :309 : )

    . ( , ,

    , . —

    ,

    .(1.5 : Rosen, 1977 ; B e r g s t r a s s e r , 4 7 : 1 9 2 8 )

    , ,

    : 1914

    , ,

    , . ,

    , .

    , .

    . ( , , )

    ,

    ,(36 : )

    , . ( L i p s c h a t z , 3 2 : 1 9 2 0 )

    , ,

    . ,

    ,

    ...eine europaische Sprache in durchsichtiger hebriiischer Kleidung. 5

    220

    ,

    .

    ,

    ,

    . .

    .

    , ,

    . , ,

    ,

    , , .

    , . ( B a r - A d o n , 1965: 84: 1975: 4 2 )

    .

    6 .(82 : 1965)

    Hymes : , 1 9 7 1 ) ,

    , ,(79

    Siegel, 1985, ; B l a n c , 1968 — ) (koineization)

    , , .(1997

    :

    ,

    , :

    . ,

    ) ( ) . ( 165 :

    . : ( )

    But it would be utterly wrong to condude that contemporary Hebrew is a "mixed 6 language" or the !ike. This would be a misstatement.

    . 7

    221

  • ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , . —

    — — ,

    , , 8 ,

    . ,

    ,

    ,CreoLlST^ .

    ;a 1999 )

    .() ,

    (The Emergence of Modem Hebrew : 2000 6 29 . , , ) . ( S i e g e i , 1997 Mufwene, 1997 , . ,

    . .

    , , .

    222

    , . ( M u l h a u s i e r , 1999: 1 2 1 )

    )

    : (

    ,

    .

    , ,

    Muhihausler, 1999: 122 ).9)

    ,

    :

    ,

    . , , ,

    ,Pidginization and Creolization of Languages

    :

    ,

    ,

    . . .

    ,

    ,

    . . .

    ,

    Hymes, 1971 : 84).10)

    Tjhere is, however, a sense that many pidgins and Creoles (especially the ones the 9] majority of creolists have tended to work on) have something in common. What they share is that they have developed over a short period of time in the context of mass population movements in the colonial and post-colonial age and that typically they are examples of the ability of humans to adapt their ways of speaking to new communicative requirements. Inasmuch as these requirements differ from situation to situation, different linguistic outcomes can be expected. Pidginization is that complex process of sociolinguislic change comprising reduction 10 in inner form, with convergence, in the context of restriction in use... Creolization is that complex process of sociolinguistic change comprising expansion in inner form, with convergence, in the context of extension in use... Pidginization is usually associated with simplification in outer form, creolization with

    complication in outer form,

    223

    http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/creolist.htmlhttp://listserv.1inguist1ist.org/archives/creolist.htm1

  • , . ,

    , .

    :

    Rickford ; , 1977 : 1 9 5 )

    . ( 10 -6 :1997 ,Mulhausler ; 84 ; 7 9 - 7 8 :1971 ,Hymes ;1977 ,Bickerton

    , ,

    , ( M U h l h a u s l e r , 1997 : 2 3 1 ) , ( B i c k e r t o n , 1977: 4 9 )

    — —

    .

    ,

    , , .

    , .

    ,

    .

    . , ,

    — ( )

    . .

    ,

    ,

    . : , .

    , . ( ; - )

    ,

    ) .

    , ( F e r g u s o n and DeBose, 1977

    .

    , .

    , ,

    22

    ( F e l l m a n , 1973: 3 8 - 3 7 ) , .

    .

    ,

    , .(434 : )

    .

    ,

    : :231 : )

    , .(136

    . ,

    ,

    ,

    .

    Parfitt ;1950 ,Chomsky;, 1972 : ; R o t h , 1 9 3 4 )

    , . ( ! :1984

    ,

    , : ,

    ,

    ,

    , . ,

    ,

    , ,

    . ,

    ;

    , . (88-87 : )

    , ,

    . (140-139 ,79-78 : ) p

    .

    .(24 ,2 : L i p s c h u t z , 1 9 2 0 )

    225

  • , .

    . .

    ,(Arnold von Harff)

    ,

    ,beyueren-1 ) ,

    toeff ) ,(schlaeffen ,dormen ,drincken

    ( , ' ,gude naicht" ,toeff laila ;"guden morgen" ,boker

    : : ; Babinger ; 1860 ,Groote, 1920 )

    . (275-271

    .

    .

    Abigai ls (1837 ) I. L. Lyon

    . .(1838 ) Lindo

    : .

    . ? ; ? 1 1 . ; : :

    , ,

    , , , ,

    ,

    .

    , , , .

    , ,

    : ) ,

    1 2 .(433 : : 1 6 - 1 5

    : , ,

    ,

    ; ) Lindo, 1842 ; Lyon, 1837 11 .( .

    — .14-9 : 12 : — — — . ; — ,

    22

    , , .

    , ,

    , 1 3 .

    ,( )

    .

    ,

    . ,

    ,

    , .

    )

    . (

    . , , ,

    , — ,

    , —

    , .

    . ,

    — —

    jMorag) , , :

    .(1971

    ,

    — ,

    .

    ( ) 13 , .( — — ) . , . , ,

    .

    227

  • , ( K u t s c h e r , 1982: 1 9 2 - 1 9 0 )

    )

    , , (26 -25 :

    , ,

    , . ( K u t s c h e r , 1982: 1 8 4 )

    ,

    . — ,

    , , ,

    .

    , ,

    , .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    Romaine ; 8 8 - 7 8 :1988 ,Lehiste ;192 :1977 ,Rickford,)

    . ( 1 9 8 8 : 161-158; 2 1 9 - 2 1 1 :1997 ,Muhlhausler ; 6 0 - 5 2 : 1988 ,Holm

    ,

    .

    ,

    , ,

    .

    ,

    , .

    . ,

    ,

    , , 4 .

    14

    22

    5 5 .(2.4 : K u z a r , 2001 )

    :

    ,

    , ,

    . ,

    ,

    :

    ; ((1

    prior) (2)

    : (creolization

    . , ( W e x l e r , 1 9 9 0 ) . ( M u h l h a u s J e r , 1997: 1 0 8 - 1 0 2 ) .( , ) , , . ( H o r v a t h and Wexier, 1 9 9 7 ) , . , , , , . , . , ! . , ( ) , .( ) . , ) : , : ,1990 .(2.4 : K u z a r , 2001

    . , 15

    .

    229

  • , (3)

    ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    . .

    402 : ; :32 : ) 1 6 . .(372

    , .

    .

    , -

    , . ( M o r a g , 1 9 5 9 )

    1 7 . (22 ;36 , )

    ( ) : ,

    : )

    ( 314-313 : ;33

    ,

    .(373 : Kutscher, 1982 , , )

    , ,

    )

    , , (554 : ) 16 — : ; - ; . —

    . , , , , 1 . , .

    230

    , : Parfitt, 1984: 2 6 4 ; 38 :

    , ( ) . ( [68-47 : ]

    ,

    , ( M o r a g , 1993: 2 1 7 - 2 1 3 )

    ,

    ( ) . (1948-1917)

    , .

    , [ [ ] , ,

    .

    . ,

    .(35 )

    ,

    ,

    , ,

    . ( R o s e n , 1977 : 57 )

    ( , ) .

    , ,

    . ( )

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    ,

    , .

    , [

    , .

    2

  • ,

    .(131 : )

    .

    .

    )

    ) . , , (

    ( .

    ,

    , .

    Muhlhausler, 1999 : 129).13)

    .

    ,

    :

    :

    , :

    1 9 : ,

    ;

    :

    , , .

    , .

    .

    .

    .Both Creoles and Creole space are multidimensional 18

    , , , 19 .

    2 2

    : .( ) : . . . ,

    . : ,

    . -

    . : . .—

    . : .

    : .1917-1777 , . , ,

    ,

    : . : , . .( ) —

    .

    : . . / . ,

    . : : .( )

    .307-291 .

    . : . , /

    .39-34 : . . . ,

    : . , . ,

    .167-163 . : . .( )

    : . : . . ,

    . : .

    . . - . ,

    ,68-41 : ;82-65 :

    . : . . . ,

    . — . . —

    ,138-115:24

    . . . ,

    : . . . ,

    :

    .190-148 . : .

    : . . ,

    .126-107 : .

    . p . . ,

    , :

    233

  • :( ) : . . .— .446-427

    .( ) : . . . , : . - :

    ,568-552 . .54-9:2 . . . . ,

    .426-407:( ) : . . . ,

    . . - , , , . .

    . : ? . . , . . : . ! :1/ ,

    .84-77 : . . . ,

    .

    . : . . , . :

    : .( ) : . . . , , . : . . . . . .42-17=) .

    .( - . , . . ,

    .214-205 : . : . . . , . : . , . . :

    .(II , : . . . ,

    .103 ,72-33 :(21) ; 10-8 . . . . . [

    .7 (18) :8-10 ;8 (19) :6-9 ;9 (20) :7-9 ;10 (21) :8-10 ;9-7 .( ) , : . . . ,

    .315-296 . . .

    234

    . . . ,

    .117-114 : , . . : . .

    .71-57 : . .145-109 : , 125 , . ,

    .233-227 : , . . .— .( ) : . . . -

    .140-125 . : , :

    .51-46 : / . . . ,

    : . : . . ,

    .

    , . . .( ) ,

    .49-33 :56 . . ,

    .201-187 ,68-50 : . .90-83 : . . . . ,

    Babinger, F. 1920. Die Hebräischen Sprachproben bei Ritter Arnold von Harff.

    Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaften des Judentums 44: 71-75.

    Bar-Adon, Aaron. 1965. The Evolution of Modern Hebrew. In J. L. Teller

    (ed.). Acculturation and Integration: 4 Symposium by American, Israeli and

    African Experts. New York: American histadrut Cultural Exchange Instiute.

    65-95.

    —. 1975. The Rise and Decline of a Dialect: A Study in the Revival of Modern

    Hebrew. (Janua Linguarum, Series Practica, 197.) The Hague: Mouton.

    . : Bergsträsser, Gotthelf. 1928. Einfüfrung in die semitischen Sprachen. (2nd

    printing.) München: Max Hueber,

    Bickerton, Derek. 1977. Pidginization and Creolization: Language Acquisition

    and Language Universals. In: Albert Valdman (ed.). Pidgin and Creole

    Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 49-69.

    Blanc, Haim, 1968. The Israeli Koineas an Emergent National Standard. In Joshua

    A. Fishman et al. (eds.). Language Problems in Developing Nations. New

    York: John Wiley, 237-251.

    235

  • Blau, Joshua. 1978. The Historical Periods of the Hebrew Language. In Herbert

    H. Paper (ed.) Jewish Languages: Theme and Variations, Proceedings of

    Regional Conferences of the Association for Jewish Studies Held at the

    University of Michigan and New York University in March-April 1975.

    Cambridge, MA: Association for Jewish Studies. 1-13.

    Chomsky, William. 1950. Did Hebrew Ever Die? Jewish Frontiers 7/9: 43-51.

    Fellman, Jack. 1973. The Revival of a Classical Tongue. Eliezer Ben Yehuda and

    the Modern Hebrew Language, The Hague: Mouton.

    Ferguson, Charles A. and Charles E. DeBose 1977. Simplified Registers, Broken

    Language, and Pidginization. In: Albert Valdman (ed.). Pidgin and Creole

    Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 99-125.

    Givon, Talmy. 1979. Prolegomena to any Sane Creology. In Ian F. Hancock et

    al. (eds.). Readings in Creole Studies. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia. 3-35.

    von Groote, E. (ed.). 1860. Die Pilgerfahrt des Ritters Arnold von Harff. Coin.

    Hagcge, Claude. 2000. Halte ä la mort des langues. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Holm, John. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles. Vol. I: Theory and Structure. (Cambridge

    Language Surveys.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Horvath, J. and P. Wexler. 1997. Relexification: Prolegomena to a Research

    Program. In: J. Horvath and P. Wexler (eds.). Relexification in Creole and

    Non-Creole Languages. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 11-71.

    Hymes, Dell (ed.). 1971. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages:

    Proceedings of a Conference Held at the University of the West Indies,

    Mona, Jamaica, April 1968. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Kutscher, Edward Yechezkel. 1982. A History of the Hebrew language. Edited

    by Raphael Kutscher. Jerusalem: Magnes.

    Kuzar, Ron. 2001. Hebrew and Zionism: A Discourse-Analytic Cultural Study.

    Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Lehiste, Ilse. 1988. Lectures on Language Contact. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Lindo, Abigail. 1842. A Hebrew and English and Hebrew Vocabulary . . . also

    Hebrew and English Dialogues. Second Ed. . . . London.

    Lipsclultz, E. M. 1920. Vom Lebendigen Hebräisch. Berlin: Jüdischer Verlag.

    Lyon, I. L. 1837. or Hebrew and English Spelling Book.

    London.

    236

    Morag, Shlomo. 1959. Planned and Unplanned Development in Modern Hebrew.

    Lingua 8: 247-263.

    —. 1971. Pronunciations of Hebrew. In Encyclopaedia Judaica. Vol. 13.

    1120-1145.

    —. 1993. The Emergence of Modern Hebrew: Some Sociolinguistic Perspectives.

    In: Lewis Glinert (ed.). Hebrew in Ashkenaz: A Language in Exile. New

    York: Oxford University Press. 208-221.

    Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1997. Jargons, Pidgins, Creoles, and Koines: What are

    They? In Arthur K. Spears and Donald Winford (eds.). The Structure

    and Status of Pidgins and Creoles: Including Selected Papers from the

    Meetings of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Amsterdam . John

    Benjamins. 35-70.

    Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1997. Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. (Westminster Creolistics

    Series, 3.) Westminster: University of Westminster Press.

    —. 1999. More on Non-Canonical Creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole

    Languages 14: 121-130.

    Oman, Uzzi. 1984. Hebrew in Palestine before and after 1882. Journal of Semitic

    Studies 29: 225-254.

    Rickford, John R. 1977. The Question of Prior Creolization in Black English. In:

    Albert Valdman (ed.). Pidgin and Creole Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana

    University Press. 190-221.

    Romaine, Suzanne. 1988. Pidgin and Creole Languages. (Longman Linguistics

    Library.) London: Longman.

    Rosen, Haiim B. 1977. Contemporary Hebrew. (Trends in Linguistics, State-of-

    the-Art Reports, 11.) The Hague: Mouton.

    Roth, Cecil. 1934. Was Hebrew Ever a Dead Language? The Jewish Chronicle

    of London. November 23. ( - Cecil Roth. Personalities and Events in Jewish

    History. Philadelphia 1961. 136-142.)

    Siegel, Jeff. 1985. Koines and Koineization. Language in Society 14: 357-378.

    —. 1997. Mixing, Levelling and pidgin/creoie development. In A. Spears and D.

    Winford (eds.). The Structure and Status of Pidgins and Creoles. Amsterdam:

    John Benjamins. 111-149.

    237

  • Simon, Leon. 1920. The Renascence of Hebrew in Palestine. In: Studies in Jewish

    Nationalism. London. 129-147. (= Palestine, October 5,19 and 26, 1918.)

    Spolsky, Bernard. 1995. Conditions for Language Revitalization; A Comparison

    of the Cases of Hebrew and Maori. Current Issues in Language & Society

    2: 177-201.

    Wexler, Paul. 1975. Review of Fellman 1973. Lingua 36: 370-373.

    —. 1990. The Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search

    of a Semitic Past. (Mediterranean Language and Culture Monograph Series,

    4.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

    238