View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
1/10
Alson ukanch201 S. Brgheaf Bvd Se 4Smhfed NC 27577
Executiv Oc r Immigraion Rview
Board of Immigtion AppealsOjce of he Clek
/ f u
OHS/IC ce of Chef Counse - SOC146 CCA Roadumpkn GA 31815
Name SANCHZVAZQUZ BRYAN A 205-213-774
Dae of hs noce 8/30/2013
Enclosd is a copy of th Board's dcision and order in h abov-rfrnced cas.
Encosur
Mb Hg G
Sincrly,
Do CVDonna Ca
Cif Clrk
k
Cite as: Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
2/10
SANCHEZVAZQUEZ, BRYANA205-23774146 CC RoadLumpkin GA 31815
Ecut Oc Immaton Rw
Bo of igion AlO ofth Clk
57 lesbrg Pi, Se 2000Fa Cwh Vna 4
OHSICE ice of Chief Counsel SOC146 CCA Roadumpkin, GA 31815
Name: SANCHZVAZQUEZ, BRYAN 20523774
Date of this notice: 8/30/2013
Encosd s a coy of th Boad's dcson n th aboncd cas Ths coy s bnodd to you as a coutsy You attoy o sntat has bn sd wth thsdcson usuant to 8 CFR 1292(a). If th attachd dcson ods that you bmod om th Untd Stats o ams an mmaton Juds dcson odn that youb mod any tton w of th attachd dcson must b d wth and cdby th aoat cout of aas wthn days of th dat of th dcson
ncosu
Mb
g G
_ . ;
Sncy,
Dcn ct
zrw;atg.1.....wmc.
onna CaChf C
:NzA: Dot;kc
.
Cite as: Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
3/10
U.S pm JuExecutiv Oc r Immaion Rvw
Dcson of th Boad ofmmation Appals
Fal Chuch, Vgna4
File: 205 2 3 774 - Lumpkin G Dae
n e: BRY SANCHEZ-VAZQUEZ REMOV PROCEEDNGS
PPE
ON BEH OF RESPODE: ison ukanich, Esuir
O BEH OF DHS: Diane Doddssistant Chie Couns
CHRGE:
AUG 3 201
otice: Sec 2 2(a)(6)()(i) & c [8 SC 1182(a)()()(i)] Prsent wiout being admited o paroed
PPCO: Volunary departur
he Depamen o Homand Scurity ("DHS) appas om he mmiation udgesMach 29 2013 dcision graning h respondents applicaion r vountary dparur Scion240B(a)() o he mmigation and Naionaliy c 8 SC 1229c(a)(). The rspondn anative and ciizen o Mexico opposes h appea 1 he appal wi e dismissed
e eview r cear or the ndings o ct including the dtermination o crdiilitymad by the mmigraion udge 8 CF R 1003 1(d)(3)(i) reviw de novo a ohr issusincuding whher paries have met the evant burdn o proo and issues o discrtion8 CFR 1003(d)(3)(ii)
e a the mmiaion udges grant o vountary dpartur under safguards to thespondn W disagre wit h DHS hat the mmigraion udge impeissiby shied thebudn o proving ha he rspondens convicion r maintaining a pace r controldsubsancs in violaion o section 90108(a)(7) o orth Caroina Genera Saus was r anaggravaed ony Thre is no dispue ha i is he espondents budn to estaish eigiiity
r he reie hat he seks d thus to show that he was not convicd o an agavatd lony(Rspondns Repy Bie a 45) See 240(c)(4) o the ct 8 SC 1229a(c)(4) 8 CFR l 42(b)(I )(i)(E)
1 h respondent contends hat e DHS did no propery se him is appeal brie andconseueny requests summa dismissa o e DHSs appa e concude tha smaydismissal is not waranted as a resu o this procdua iguarity in his instanc bu t hrespondents reuest to accep his ae epy bri
Cite as: Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
4/10
205 213 774
e a the mmiion udges conclusion tat e responden me is bude i is cee record o coniction reects at te respondent was convicted o a misdemeor (Ex 2)The DHS assers tat e respondents oense is a dug acking agavaed elony because iis euivaen o a lony under he Federal Conrolled Subsances ct specically 2 USC 856(a) See Lopez Goales 549 US 47 (2006) see also secion 01(a)(3)(B) o te ct8 SC 101(a)(43)(B)
Presuming hat he convicion rested upon noting more tan he east o te acscriminalied we concude hat the minimum conduct necessary to sustain a conviction underNC Gen Sa 90108(a)(7) does not sais he eemens o he dera stue SeeMoncriefe v. Holder, 33 SC 1678 684 (203) To obtain a convicion under herespondens saute o conviction e Stae mus prove a deendan () kowingy orinenionaly kep or maintained (2) a buiding or oer pace (3) being used r e keeping orseling o a controed subsance State Fuller 196 NCpp 412 24 674 SE 2d 824 832(2009) hus knowngy bu no inenionally keeping a place being used by anoher pesonbu not onese r merey "keeping a conroled substance woud mee he reuirements o NCGen Sa 90108(a)(7) However hs conduc ls short o te conduct ta would sustain aconvicion under secion 856(a)(l ) o ie 2 which reuires at te individua personayinend o engage in proibied drug manucuring disbution or usage bu does not proibimere keeping o a conolled subsance and does not reach the conduc o oters Similary hemnimum conduc uder NC Gen Sa 9008(a)(7) alls so o tat reuired to sustain aconviction under section 856(a)(2) o ie 2 which reuires a "kowing and ientionalmens rea ccordingy violaion o he respondens satue o convicion is no categoicay andug tracking agavaed ony oense See Moncrie older supra a 685 n4(providing hat he anaysis reuired o deeine wha aien was convicted o is he same inboth the removabiiy and reie conexs)
he record does no conclusivey esabis which o he oenses encompassed by NC GenStat 9008(a)(7) is he basis r he respondents convicion and hus under te modiedcategorical approach i does no esabish ha he respondens convicion was r a agavatedlony See Descamps US. 33 SC 2276 (2013) (providing hat te modied categoricalapproach is appropate when a staute o conviction is divisibe) However because te recordo convicion reects a he respondens convicion was r a misdemeanor e has establishedha his oense is not euivalen o 21 SC 856(a)(2) wich includes te mens rea o"knowingy ad inentionally See NC Gen Sa 9008(b) (poviding tat violaion o tissection is a Class misdemeanor excep ha a vioation commied intentionaly is a Class elony) oreover he responden presened a compee record o conviction and te recorddoes no support e concusion at oher judiciay coible documens exist tha woud shedaddtiona ligt on he respondents convicion e conclude ha te sponden has me isburden by showing by a preponderance o he evidence that he was not conviced o anaggravaed lony and herere ha he is no precuded om oherwse esabishing eligibiliyr volun depaure
he HS does no caenge he mmigration udges vorable exercise o discreion in thiscase ccordingly he DHSs appeal wi be dismissed and voutary deparure wi bereinsaed
2
Cite as: Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
5/10
A205 213 774
ORDER: The appea 'is dismisse.
FURHR ORDER Pusuant to the Imigration Judges order d conditioned uoncompiance with conditions set h by the mmigration udge ad the statute, the respondent is
permied to voluntarily depart the nite Sttes wihout expense to he Goveent, witin 30ays o the date of is oder or ay extension beyond that tie s ay be ganted y he HSSee section 240B(a) of e Imigration an Nationaity ct, 8 U.SC. 229c(a); see also8 CF.R 124026(b), ( n the event te espondent is to vountariy depart te UnitedStates, te respondent shal be removed s provided in te mmiatio Judges order
NOIC: If the resondent fais to voluniy deprt the United Sttes within te tieperiod specied, or ay extensios anted by te DHS, the respondent sa be subject to a civipenaty as provided y the reulations an te statute and sall be ineigibe r a period of 10yeas r y er elief unde section 240B and sections 240, 24, 248, and 249 of e ct.See sectio 240B(d) of te ct
WG: If he respondent les a motion to reopen or reconsider prior to the expiration ofe voutary departure period set rh above he ant of volnry depture is automaticayterminated he peiod aowed r voutay departure is not styed toed, or extended. If egrt of volty depature is automaticay teinated upon te ling of a otion, the penatiesr failue to epat under section 240B(d) of te ct shal not apply. See 8 C.R 124026(e)()
WING If, rior to earting the United States, he respondent es any judiciachalenge to tis adminisativey na order, such as a petition r review prsut to section
242 of te ct, 8 US.C 252, he grt of vounay depe is automaticay teinated, dhe ateate oder of remova sa iediatey take eect However, if te respondent es apetition r review ad en depats he Unite States within 30 days of suc ing, teespondent wil not e deemed to ave eaed under an order of emova if te alien providesto te HS suc evidence of his or he depaure that he Imiation ad Customs EnrcementFied Oce Director of te DHS may require ad provides evience DHS deems suciet thate or se a reained outide of the United States he penaties r iure to de undersection 240B() of the ct sha not apy to an aien who es a petition r review,nowitstading y period of tie that e o she reains in te nited Sttes whie te petitionr review is pending See 8 C.F.R 124026(i).
3Cite as: Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
6/10
(
UNITED STAES DEPARTMNT OF JUSICEXCUTIVE OFFC FOR MMGRAON RVEW
NTD STATES IMMIGRATION COUR
LUMPKN, GEORGIA
Fe: A205-21377
n the Maer of
March 29 203
BRYAN SANCHEZVAZQUZ
RESPONDENT
))
))
IN REMOVAL PROCDINGS
CHARGS Section 212(a)(6)(A)(i) present wthout being admitted or paroled.
APPLICATIONS Preconclusion vounta depaure
ON BHALF OF RSPONDENT: ALISON LUKINICH
ON BHALF OF DHS: DIANE DODD
OAL DCSON O H MMGRATON JUDG
EXHIBTS
xhibit 1 Notce to Apear; Exhibit 2, record of respondent's convction Exhibt
3, Fo 213 xhbt respondents memorandum of aw in suppo of his request for
volunta depaure Exhibit 5 respondents prehearing bref xhbit 6 statement from
Detectve Mao
WTN
Respondent
n arrving of my finding of acts and conclsons of aw I have considered al the
1
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
7/10
documenta and testimonia evidence in this case My failue to comment of a specific
exhibit or paicuar testimony does not mean that I faied to consider it
CRDIBILIT
Based upon the totaity of the cicumstances I find respondent to be cedibe
NDINGS OF ACT AND CONCLUSIONS O W
xhibit 1 was seed on respondent on Octobe 5, 2012 On Decembe 27,
2012 in accodance with the respondents peas the alegations in xhibit 1 wee
sustained and espondent was und by cea and convincing evidence to be emovable
as charged in xhibit 1 Mexico was designated as the count of emova
Respondent is not an ariving aien
Respondents equest for vounta departue is timely Respondent has made
no additiona equests r relief Respondent concedes emovabiity and waived appea
of a issues
Respondent is not depotabe uder Section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) as an aggravated
feon o unde Section 237(a)() fo security o reated gounds Although the
Depaent of omeland Secuity argues that respondent is an aggavated feon, I am
unabe to conclude that espondent has been convicted of any oense related to
traicking in a controled substance
find that espondent does merit a favoabe execise of my discretion in granting
vounta depaure
Respondent has a criina histo which demonstrates a toubled childhoodRespondent is now 19 years of age Respondent admits that he has o convictions
invoving dugs one or possessing maijuana and one fo possessing cocaine Indeed
respondent admits that he enjoys smoking marijuana xhibit 2 shows that
espondents aest fo possessing cocaine was disposed of by his conviction fo
A205-21377 2 Mach 29 2013
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
8/10
( (
mantaining a vehcle fr purpses f a cntrled substance Respnden explained
tha he was fund pssessng ccaine while traveling as a passenger n a car ccuped
and drven by thers
Respnden was brught t the United States in 1993 when he was ny tw
mnths ld The Unted States s the ny hme that he has ever knwn Respndent
has t aunts wh are awful permanent resdents several US citzen cusns and a
15yearld US cten brther
Snce the respnden has turned 18 he admits tha he has been arrested tice
Respnden has been cnvcted since he tured 18 fr pssessin f an achc
beverage cnsuming alchc beverages and drivng wihu a icense e has as
been cnvicted as shwn n Exhibt 2
thstanding respndent's crimnal hstry I cncude that as a matter f
discretn respnden st warrants a vluntary departure in his case am mndfu that
much f respndents crmnal encunters ccurred while he was a juvene and nt as
an adult am als mndfu f the fac tha essentaly respndents crimina maters are
reatvey mnr in nature
Accrdngly I am gng t enter the flwing rder
ORDER
IT S EREBY ORDERED respndents reques fr vluna depaure is
granted A wrien rder refectng the abve decsin wl be prvided separately and
made pa f the recrd
signature
A20521377
Please see the nextpage for electronicDA TRIMBLEmmgratin udge
3 March 29 2013
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
9/10
C i
A20S-213.774 4 March 29, 2013
7/30/2019 Bryan Sanchez-Vazquez, A205 213 774 (BIA Aug. 30, 2013)
10/10
//s//
Iigration Judge DAN TRIMBLE
rmled n May 2, 2013 a 1:28 GMT
205-213774 5 Mac 29, 2013
Recommended