Aminadad Natanael Mendez-Perez, A099 623 872 (BIA Oct. 30, 2013)

8/14/2019 Aminadad Natanael Mendez-Perez, A099 623 872 (BIA Oct. 30, 2013)

1/5

Casta, Lymari, Esq.The Casta Law ice372 East 204th Street, Ste ABronx, NY 10467

m Ju

Executive Oce r Immgaon Revew

B Ig O Ck

5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000Fals Church Vrini 20530

OHS/ICE ice of Chief Counsel - NYC26 Federal Plaza, 11th loorNew York NY 10278

Nae: MENDEZ EREZ AINADAD N A 099-623-872

Date of this otice 10/30/2013

cosed s a copy of he Boad's decson ad ode n e above-eenced case.

nose

Pel Mmes:H h Gd J

Sceely,

D cDona CaChef Cek

sem Dck

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Aminadad Natanael Mendez-Perez, A099 623 872 (BIA Oct. 30, 2013)


2/5

U.S Dpartmnt f JusceExecutive Oce r Imiration Reiew

Decision of e Board of iaon Apeals

Falls Cch Virginia 41

Fe: A099 623 872-New York, NY

re AA NATAEL EZPEREZ

REMOVAL PROCEEDGS

EAL

Dat

ON BEHALF OF SPONDENT Ly asa Esqui

PLICAON openg

IOCT 3 0 21

rsndn, a niv d ciizen of e Dic Rpublic apals maJd's dcisin da My 29 01 eny h spndents t ro ord

reoval red in snia on Febary 4 202 Bod ds ctua ndngs f iaon Jude, unless hey clly onous but i rtais dndn judgent ddscrn, sbect o apcabl goveing stnds rgdng ur quesons f aw haplicaion of picular sdd of law ose cs. 8 C F 003(d)(3) Under aly of te circsncs w persuaded y rsndn's t hat h stabsdxconal crcstces" r s flure t ape d ta he n absia rder solderer be rescidd S scin 0 )()(C)(i) of an d Natinaliy Ac 8 SC 29ab)()(C)(i); Mr of W-F, 2 &N Dc 503, 09 (BA 99)

Accorgy lowng orr wll be entrd

OER Te apeal s ssaned e absena ord f roval s rescindd heseroceedns e reopened d h record is rened r pcdings cnsst rgon pnon

Cite as: Aminadad Natanael Mendez-Perez, A099 623 872 (BIA Oct. 30, 2013)


3/5

TD STTS DPTN O JUSEEXEV OFI OR IMMGRO REVEW

IMIRAION ONEW RK EW

Fe A# 6 87

I te Mte )

)EEZPz Nl

)espodet

HGLAION

A (()Boti t Repe

N BEHAL HE RSPNDNTH Beji eez sq Brody Suite 4Ne or NY 11

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDNGS

N BEHF OF THE SRVERet rsAssist ie ose Ne Yor Ne or NY 8

DECION OF THE MMGRTO DE

I Pcedur HistorRespodet id ENDEZ is ie d citie Dmiic Repubic

s dmited t te Uited Sttes t e Yor N s immigt B- ugst 7 7 s immigrt vsito i uizti emi in e Uited stes r tempory peiodt to exceed mts Te Respdet emed i te Uited Sttes bed te llobet time itut utoizti m te Depmet f Hmed Secit DS) OAp 4 11 DHS issued d pers seed Notice t ppe T) ( 86)egigt e espodet etered te ted Stes ("S o or about ust 27, 200, s og B-2 uti t rem i te S r tempor perid o to exceedsix ms e N cges espodet i rembii pusu t Secto ()()B) te mmigrtio d it c (te "Act i tt er is dmissi s immigrtB- te ie emied i te ited Sttes beod Neber 5 8 wiou uizio.


4/5

n Novembr 15, 201, Rspodent appre wi is attoey and reuestd aajoent n orer r the espoent crimia matr to b resolved s wel to give theRespondnt n opponity to aress hat rms of ref he i e seking with e Cou. Co adjou te ater to F 4 202 at 9:30 am he origi notic ceaystates t corrct at an tie of the hg oth pies wer persoally seed wt a copy

of e notic Fuher, th Co also nnounc orly e accuate at of e ncomingrng. Novmber , 20, the Rspondent was provie wrtten notice of is incomngheang sceued r eb 14, 2012 at 930

Feruay 4, 2012, the Respondent faled to appea at his schedued hering and teCo conducted n in absentia eig ad orred Respoent removed to Doinicn

replic psuant to the chrge contan n th NT

n ch 2, 2012 , Resonnt, toug hs counsel, e a motion to reopen.Responent requests that procedings be reopened ecaus he clams at he missed hisschedued haring due to clrical stke on th Co's prt. ore speccally, e Rspontalegs at he rceived a hearing notice om te Court, which indicatd that he ws schedudr a heing on Febuay 5, 202 n pr 5, 012, DH ed a repy in opposition to he

rspondnt's otion oreoe

IL L gal tna & Analysisn order enterd n absenia in remova procedngs may ony e rescidd upon a

motion to ropn ed ) hn 80 ays ar th ate of te order of remova the alindemonstates tat e ie to appear ws because of eceptiona circumstces eyond teircotrol; or 2) at any tme if the lin demonsats tat tey i ot receive notice or tat theywere er or state cusoy an tir failre o appe ws houg o ult of he own. ee8 CFR 323b)4)iii)).

he Cou s that he Responent recived proper notice. Te recor of poceingsrecs tat e proer notice of hring was seve on the Respondent on November 5, 201whn atte to s last aser calenr heang wit his counsel a he was awe of isebruary 4, 202 mter clend heang date. The origil notice of e heag cealy sttesthe date of Fu 4, 20. he origina notic of e eing fls to conta th allegecorcton or mnet. he Co reviewe its origna heng notic in the recor of

proceeigs an coclued that this ateraton is not i e originl document thoug it suncear who made tis chnge to e Notc of the aing, bse o the totality of the evience,

t appes that ts Cor was not responsile r this alteration Based on my revie of theevience provided n th motion to ropn, it aso apps that th number has eenhanwtten ovr te number hat originay was low asd o h toa of h vdc, Rpod w roery sved wth a notic of the aing s he was resnt in o anrecivd ora oce n prson. Terre, Rspodent has not suciently monstat thatte notice ws efective or improper or that an eceptional circumstncs prevend m om

2


5/5

Documents

Aminadad Natanael Mendez-Perez, A099 623 872 (BIA Oct. 30, 2013)