Doue Tur Col u20(1)

7/28/2019 Doue Tur Col u20(1)

1/4

Unofficial Referee Observers Report rbitro Internacional & The Third Team

(TUR) TURKEY 0:1 COLOMBIA (COL)

Group C, 25 June 2013, 20:00 CET Rize (TUR)

Match Officials Name ORI Mark1 Mark2 Difficulty3

Referee Noumandiez Doue CIV 8.1 --- Challenging

Assistant Referee 1 Songuifolo Yeo CIV 8.3 --- Normal

Assistant Referee 2 Jean-Claude Birumushahu BDI 8.3 --- Normal

Fourth Official Nawaf Shukralla BHR 8.4 --- Normal

Blog Referee Observer Edward A. GRE

1 Final mark according to evaluation scale.2 Mark if the final mark had not been influenced by a crucial mistake (only in case of a crucial mistake, to be held empty if no crucial mistake occurred).3 Difficulty has to be integrated into the final mark. Levels of difficulty are: normal, challenging and very challenging.4 Blog-Referee Observer =Inofficial referee observer appointed by the blog administrator.

Evaluation scale(for referee, ARs andfourth official)

Description of the Marks

9.0 10.0 Excellent.

8.5 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.

8.3 8.4 Good. Expected level.

8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.

8.0 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.

7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.

7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 8.2.

7.5 7.7Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) forimprovement.

7.0 7.4Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear importantmistake or a performance with two or more clear and importantmistakes.

6.0 6.9 Unacceptable.

Small description of the match (extra-ordinary incidents etc.):Second Matchday of Group C between hosts Turkey and Colombia played at Rize and withan attendance of 13015. Pitch and weather conditions were very good and the crowd wasvery enthusiastic thus creating a very hot atmosphere for the Ivorian Referee NoumandiezDoue. So Match difficulty is Challenging

7/28/2019 Doue Tur Col u20(1)

2/4

Unofficial Referee Observers Report rbitro Internacional & The Third TeamReferee

Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the referees decision

Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight thereferees tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teamsand players, teamwork etc.).Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!

Positive Points

1. Fitness/Stamina. He presented a very good level of fitness the whole 90 minutes.

2.Foul detection. He had a good overall foul detection and he managed not towhistle every little contact.

3.Advantage rule. Good applying of the advantage rule allowing the match to havea good pace.

4.Card management in terms of tactical fouls. He punished almost every tacticalinfraction.

Points for Improvement

1.

Gestures. Surely a big part of his performance. He used strict gestures andmaybe a little theatrical (min. 40) to warn players from both teams and maintaincontrol. This didnt worked well for him since the players clearly didnt respect himand he lacked authority.

2.Respect and authority. 2 elements a referee should have. At this case he didnthave any. So he lost control of the match especially after Colombias on ly goal.

3.Influence from the crowd. Since it was a match of the host nation, one couldexpect that the crowd would put the referee under enormous pressure. Thathappened and unfortunately the referee fell for it.

4.

Card management in other infractions of the LoTG. He missed some mandatoryYC like in cases of executing a free-kick before the whistle or violating the 9.15distance. He tried to resolve such situations only with gestures but didnt

managed to.

7/28/2019 Doue Tur Col u20(1)

3/4


The referees character

Physical Aspects + Expected -

Fitness / Stamina X

Always close to play without inferfering with it X

Flexible diagonal movement X

Positioning at set pieces X

Efficient positioning, having a good angle ofvision to play

X

Close to the penalty area, if needed X

Tactical Approachvery

lenientlenient medium strict

verystrict

Description X

Yes So-so No

Consistency in the tactical approach / style X

The tactical approach suited to the require-ments of the match / the match benefittedfrom the tactical approach of the referee

X

Ability to adapt the tactical approach ifneeded

X

Further observations (peculiarities of the referee revealing his character)

Even though the referee revealed a good knowledge of the LoTG and managedto have a good level of foul detection and card management (in cases of tacticalfouls), he lacked the 2 most important elements a referee should have. Respect

and Authority. Furthermore he tried to use his gestures in order to maintaincontrol but at the end he lost control especially after min. 75. A better tacticalapproach needed/expected especially from a referee who is pre-selected forWC 2014.

7/28/2019 Doue Tur Col u20(1)

4/4


Assistant Referee 1

Please assess the first assistant referees performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene/ Assessment of the ARs behaviour

Full timeOnly one offside call through the whole match. No major calls for him, just theusual. He appeared attentive, as needed.

25 Ozturk (TUR) is flagged for offside. Correct decision even though not so difficult.

Assistant Referee 2

Please assess the second assistant referees performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the ARs behaviour

Full timeOnly one offside call through the whole match. No major calls for him, just theusual. He appeared attentive, as needed.

39 Palomeque (COL) is flagged for offside. Correct decision.

Fourth Official

Please assess the fourth officials performance.

Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth officials behaviour

full timeHe was active the whole time having to deal with protests from both coaches. Hemade his presence known many times and as a result he managed to maintainorder even though the match heated up a lot especially at the end.

Documents

Doue Tur Col u20(1)