Upload
michael
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strong, R. 2008. A Little History of the English
Country Church. London: Vintage,
231–235.
MICHAEL SUTTON
Aston University
q 2013 Michael Suttonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2013.825589
Chantiers du poeme. Premisses et pratiquesde la creation poetique moderne et con-temporaineHUGUES AZERAD, MICHAEL G. KELLY,NINA PARISH, & EMMA WAGSTAFF (Eds)Berne, Peter Lang, 2013362 pages, £45.00, ISBN: 978 3034308007
In favouring a disconcerting plurality of
‘chantiers’ over the traditionally accre-
dited ‘chant’, the editors of this stimulat-
ing volume of essays direct our attention
towards the endless process of contesta-
tion and destabilisation, rupture and
experimentation, subversion and rein-
vention, that has driven poetry’s multi-
faceted (un)making in France and
beyond since the middle of the last
century. Indeed, to borrow the distinc-
tion Angelos Triantafyllou draws in the
case of Michel Bulteau, the critic’s task
may be more akin to the seismographer’s
than to the cartographer’s, given the
generic uncertainty and polarised atti-
tudes contemporary poetic production
so frequently generates (Triantafyllou
himself refers rather sweepingly to ‘la
poesie-divertissement qui, de nos jours,
domine la scene franc�aise’ (127)).By and large, this volume sidesteps the
pitfalls of heated polemics that can all
too often obfuscate the breadth and
complexity of the other’s position.
Nevertheless, it is significant that bothClaude-Pierre Perez and Anne-Christine
Royere refer, under different section
headings, to the recent intervention byJacques Roubaud entitled ‘Obstination
de la poesie’, in which the statement ‘sansmots, pas de poesie’, formulated in the
defence of poetry, can no longer besimply taken as a truism. For Perez, the
reference serves as a counterpoint to his
discussion of Eduardo Kac’s and LouisBec’s non-verbal ‘bio-art’, in which he
allows that ‘[l’objet artistique] est faitavec des mots, mais pas seulement avec
des mots: avec des images aussi, et dessons, et des animaux, d’ou le terme de
biopoesie’ (156). In Royere’s study,mention of Roubaud’s rejection of a
poetic orality that has degenerated into a
meaningless spectacle of ‘vroum-vroum’throws into relief the Belgian poet Jean-
Pierre Verheggen’s aesthetics of the‘inSONscient’, that vies to some extent
with the performance of rap and slam.What Sarah Bewick terms ‘la poesie pure
dans ses formes diverses’ (181), as sheprobes the poetic dimension of Jean
Cocteau’s cinematography, posits poetry
as a transcendent entity as pertinent tothe screen or canvas or stage as it is to the
page, and no longer expressly beholdento words. In her analysis of Michel Butor
and Catherine Ernst’s botanical collab-orations, Nicole Biagioli argues for
poetry’s embrace of a ‘demarche holis-
tique impliquant tous les genres et tousles medias’ (204), but predicates such an
embrace, in the case of Butor, on atransgressive tension that remains inher-
ently discursive in nature. Other contri-butions highlight poetry’s hyphenated
state, from ‘poesie-peinture’ as locatedbyMarianne Froye in the work of Cadou,
Book Reviews 579
Follain and Frenaud, to Laurent Zim-
mermann’s deft dissection of Jerome
Game’s ‘video-poemes’. To differing
degrees, these essays demonstrate how,
with the rise of new technologies and the
increased interference between genres as
well as between art forms, poetry
continues to mutate through contami-
nation, hybridisation and, as it is
ushered from book to cyberspace,
delocalisation. To mutate even to the
point of the monstrous? Certainly, the
inclusion of Kac’s hapless bio-engineered
‘GFP Bunny’ in the domain of poetry
would seem to support the most
unbridled form of crossover and
contagion.Michel Deguy has long warned, not
only in poetry but in all spheres of social
interaction, against a ‘sortie du logos’, a
forsaking of language, of speech acts, of
figures of speech as the primary vehicle of
thought, at a time when the technolo-
gised image holds sway. Happily, while
pointing to certain excesses, this volume
remains very much anchored in post-war
practices of poetry that seek, beyond
previously defined boundaries and with
the evolving means available, to forge
new relations between word and world.
As Nina Parish indicates, the euphoria
sparked by the discovery of new technol-
ogies has yielded to more measured and
multi-layered instances of electronic
artistry mindful of the traditions it at
once challenges and cannot help, at
another level, but incorporate. Indeed, a
number of the practices featured in the
volume shun all spectacle, cultivate the
un-spectacular, free up our attention.
Froye’s focus on a poetics of humility is
complemented by Beatrice Bonhomme’s
assessment of James Sacre’s ‘[l]yrisme
anti-exaltatoire’ (244) or ‘poesie decep-
tive’ (248), that lays claim to the lowly
and the banal as it struggles to adhere
through language to the shared realm of
the ordinary and the everyday. Michael
Kelly teases out the juridical paradoxes of
Jacques Dupin’s self-effacing poetry as a
‘mode de presence qui dejouerait toute
notion instrumentalisable de la presence’
(316), as a writing bent on reconciling
‘l’exposition et la non-comparution’
(317). The voices of francophone
women poets, often consigned to the
margins on account of their sex and their
origins, receive welcome attention from
Thanh-Van Ton-That and Margaret
Braswell (although the inclusion of the
Quebec poet Claude Beausoleil in the
former’s panorama begs some interesting
questions!). The volume comprises four
sections (dealing respectively with the
importance of poetic questioning, with
the imprint of origins in poetry, with the
links between text and image, and with
orality and the poetics of voice), framed
by a critical contribution from Mary Ann
Caws and a creative one from Beatrice
Bonhomme. Together with the compa-
nion special issue of French Forum (vol.
37, nos. 1–2, Winter/Spring 2012)
brought forth by the same editors, it
affords a sturdy and rounded grasp of the
more salient aesthetic, ethical and politi-
cal aspects of contemporary poetic
practice in French.
MICHAEL BROPHY
University College Dublin
q 2013 Michael Brophyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2013.831052
580 Book Reviews