September 2003 1

IEEE 802.17 Draft 2.5OAM Comment Resolution

Las Vegas, NV - September 2003

Section Editor: Glenn ParsonsTechnical Editors: Leon Bruckman, Gal Mor

September 2003 2

RPR OAM

• Met in 1 session (3 long hours) for:• 72 comments reviewed

• Did not deal with most Editorials– Will ask for editorial license for 41 remaining

editorials

• Punted 2 comments to WG

• Punted 2 comments to clause 0

• Highlight of CRG resolutions

• Response to IETF on MIB

September 2003 3

OAM Comments Summary• Clause 11: OAM 41

– Accepted 17– Rejected 3– Withdrawn 1– Remaining Editorial 22

• Annex L: Echo & Flush OAM 5– Accepted 2– Remaining Editorial 3

• Clause 12: Management 18– Accepted 12– Withdrawn 1– Remaining Editorial 5

• Annex D: MIB 26– Accepted 17– Withdrawn 1– Rejected 1– Remaining Editorial 3

All Technical done

September 2003 4

Clause 11 & L Highlights

• Fix RPR alarms references

• Fix PICS

• Various binding editorials

• Various wording clarifications

• Fix state machine routines

• Align frame/payload format with new clause 0 resolution

September 2003 5

Clause 12 Highlights

• Complete parameters• Clarify & add

reference for HC• Various clarifications

September 2003 6

Clause D Highlights

• Various binding editorials

• Clarify security section

• Delicate text on clearing intervals

• Table D.2 improvements

• Change running counters back to counter64

September 2003 7

Rejected• Clause 11

– 391 - Table 11.2• Delete

• This table is useful clarification of a complex figure. It should stay.

• Annex D– Editorial rejection

September 2003 8

Punt to WG• 415 - EUI vs OUI

– Topology & OAM Organization specific protocol identifiers

– Was OUI, currently EUI, comment to make OUI– EUI rejected for similar use in 802.3ah– Propose liaison to IEEE RAC

• 467 - DELAY_TO_CHECK, DELAY_TO_RESTORE – Clause 6 uses as constant– MIB uses as read/write

September 2003 9

Ongoing review Issues

• OAM Editors need some extra time at the end of the draft writing to align the MIB cross-references

• IETF MIB experts will be informed of the disposition of their comments and continue to be offered to provide comments on future WG ballots