Betung Village, Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of KalimantanSelatan. Certificate Code : MUTU-RSPO/005 Date of certificate issue : July 05, …

PT. MUTUAGUNG LESTARI

ASSESSMENT REPORT

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Certification

[]Stage-1 [ ] Stage-2 [√] Surveillance [ ] Re-Assessment

Plantation Management : SIME DARBY Plantation Sdn Bhd

Plantation Name : Gunung Aru POM, Gunung Aru Estate, Gunung Kemasan Estate, Laut Timur Estate and Pantai Timur Estate (PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti, Minamas Plantation)

Location :

Betung Village, Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of KalimantanSelatan.

Certificate Code : MUTU-RSPO/005

Date of certificate issue : July 05, 2011

Date of expiry of certificate : July 04, 2016

Assessment Assessment

Date PT. Mutuagung Lestari

Auditor Checked

by Approved

by

ST-2 4-9 October 2010 ARYO GUSTOMO; MUHAMMAD NOOR

EFANSYAH; HENRY MARPAUNG; MARSUDI EKO SANTOSO

TAUFIK MARGANI TONY

ARIFIARACHMAN

S-1 18-23 March 2012 OCTO HPN NAINGGOLAN; IBNU SATRIA PRABUDI; OKTOVIANUS RUSMIN; RUDI

RAMDANI

RENY RUSTINIANINGSIH

TAUFIK MARGANI

S-2 23-26April 2013 DENI A. NOVENDI; MARSUDI EKO

SANTOSO; YUDWI WISNU RAHMANTO; SITI JAMILLAH

OCTO HPN NAINGGOLAN

TAUFIK MARGANI

S-3 02-05 June 2014 OCTO HPN NAINGGOLAN (Lead Auditor);

TRISMADI NURBAYUTO (Auditor); MUHAMMAD RINALDI (Auditor Trainee)

TAUFIK MARGANI TONY

ARIFIARACHMAN

Mutuagung Lestari • Raya Bogor Km 33,5 Number 19 • Cimanggis • Depok 16953• Indonesia

Telephone (+62) (21) 8740202 • Fax (+62) (21) 87740745/6

Email : [email protected] ● www.mutucertification.com

MUTU Certification • Accredited by Accreditation Services International on March 12th, 2014

Assessment Approved by MUTUAGUNG LESTARI on:

S-3

http://www.mutucertification.com/


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 i Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari forGunung Aru POM- PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti - SIME DARBY Plantation

TABLE OF CONTENT

FIGURE

Figure 1. Location Map of PT BERSAMA SEJAHTERA SAKTI Figure 2. Operational Map of PT BERSAMA SEJAHTERA SAKTI

1 2

1.0 SCOPE OF THESURVEILLANCE ASSESSMENT

1.1 National Interpretation Used 3

1.2 Organization Information 3

1.3 Type of Assessment 3

1.4 Location of Plantations, Mill and Area Statement 3

1.5 Description of Supply Base 4

1.6 Dates of Plantings and Cycles 5

1.7 Tonnage Certified 5

1.8 Other Certifications 6

1.9 Time-Bound Plan for Other Management Units 6

2.0 ASSESSMENT PROCESS

2.1 Certification Body 9

2.2 Assessment Team 9

2.3 Assessment Methodology, Assessment Process and Locations of Assessment 10

2.4 Stakeholder Consultation and List of Stakeholders Contacted 16

2.5 Date of Next Surveillance Visit 16

3.0 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS

3.1 3.2

Summary of Assessment Report of the RSPO Certification Summary of Assessment Report of Supply Chain Requirement

17 44

3.3 ConformityChecklist of Certificate and Logo Use 48

3.4 Summary of RSPO Partial Certification 49

3.5 Identification of Findings, Corrective Actions, Observations, Opportunity for Improvement and Noteworthy Positive Components

51

3.6 Summary of Arising Issues from Public, Management and Auditor Responses 65

4.0 CERTIFIED ORGANIZATION’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNAL RESPONSIBILITY

4.1 Formal Signing of Assessment Findings 70

APPENDICES

1. List of Stakeholders Contacted in the RSPO Certification Process 71

2. Assessment Program 72

3. Glossary 73

PT MUTUAGUNG LESTARI

ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 1 Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari forGunung Aru POM- PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti - SIME DARBY Plantation

Figure 1. Location Map ofPT BERSAMA SEJAHTERA SAKTI

PT MUTUAGUNG LESTARI

ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 2 Prepared by Mutuagung Lestari forGunung Aru POM- PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti - SIME DARBY Plantation

Figure 2. Operational Map ofPT BERSAMA SEJAHTERA SAKTI


ASSESSMENT REPORT

SPO – 4006a.5 Page 3 by Mutuagung Lestari forGunung Aru POM- PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti - SIME DARBY Plantation

1.0 SCOPE OF THE CERTIFICATION ASSESSMENT

1.1 National Interpretation Used National Interpretation, RSPO Principles and Criteria (P&C) for Sustainable Palm Oil

Production, Republic of Indonesia - RSPO INA-NIWG, May 2008 and RSPO Supply Chain

Certification Standard November 2011.

1.2 Organization Information

1.2.1 Company name SIME DARBY Plantation Bhd

1.2.2 Contact person Mohamad Pirabaharan

1.2.3 Company address and site address Office :

The Plaza Office Tower Lt. 36

Jl MH Thamrin Kav. 28-30, Jakarta 10350

Site :

Betung village, Pulau Laut Timursubdistrict, District of

Kotabaru, Province of South Kalimantan

1.2.4 Telephone +62-21-29926000

1.2.5 Fax +62-21-29922686

1.2.6 E-mail [email protected]

1.2.7 Web page address www.simedarby.com

1.2.8 Company status Private

1.2.9 Management Representative who completed the application for certification

Mohamad Pirabaharan

(Head of PSQM Minamas Plantation)

1.2.10 Registered as RSPO member 1-0008-04-000-00 date of07 September 2004

1.3 Type of Assessment

1.3.1 Scope of Assessment Palm oil Mill and Estate

1.3.2 Type of certificate Single

1.3.3 Company names listed in the certificate PT.Bersama Sejahtera Sakti

1.3.4 Number of management unit 1 (one) unit of Palm Oil Mill (Gunung Aru POM) which

receives FFB supply from 4 (Four) unit estates: they

are, Gunung Aru Estate (GAE), Gunung Kemasan

Estate (GKE), Laut Timur Estate (LTE)andPantai

Timur Estate (PTE).

1.4 Locations of Mill, Plantations and Area Statement

1.4.1 Location of Mill

Name of Mill Location

GPS

Latitude Longitude

Gunung Aru POM Village of Betung, Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of South Kalimantan

03º 30’ 13” S

116º 9’ 46” E

mailto:[email protected]://www.simedarby.com/


ASSESSMENT REPORT


1.4.2 Location of Supply Base

Name of Supply Base

Location GPS

Latitude Longitude

Gunung Aru Estate Village of Betung, Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of South Kalimantan

3° 30' 13"- 3° 38' 6"S

116° 09' 48" – 116° 15' 39" E

Gunung Kemasan Estate

Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of South Kalimantan

3° 30' 13"- 3° 38' 6"S

116° 09' 48" – 116° 15' 39"E

Laut Timur Estate Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of South Kalimantan

3° 30' 13"- 3° 38' 6"S

116° 09' 48" – 116° 15' 39"E

Pantai Timur Estate Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of South Kalimantan

3° 30' 13"- 3° 38' 6"S

116° 09' 48" – 116° 15' 39"E

1.4.3 Tenure

Private - Ha

State Total HGU 12,740,54 Ha (8.222,54 Ha + 3.318 Ha + 100 Ha + 1.100 Ha)

HGU on process ± 8.222,540 (explaination indicator Major 2.2.1)

Community - Ha

1.4.4 Area Statement

Total area 13,502.29 Ha

Mature area 10,765.83 Ha

Immature area 1,890.97 Ha

Mill 34.83 Ha

Infrastructure 632.98 Ha

Nursery 24.24 Ha

Ocupation 70.72 Ha

Others 152.92 Ha

HCV area 206.80 Ha

Overlapping area with INHUTANI (-) 277 Ha

1.5 Description of Supply Base

1.5.1 Description of Mill

Name of Mill Capacity

(tonnes/ hour)

FFB Processed

(tonnes/ year)

CPO Palm Kernel PKO

Out put (tonnes)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tonnes)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tonnes)

Extraction (%)

Gunung Aru Mill 40 202,319 45,363 22.40 9,728 4.81 - -

* Source Production Data on June 2013 –May 2014

1.5.2 Description of Estate(s)

Name of Estate(s) Total Area

(Ha)

Planted Area (Ha)

FFB (tonnes/year)

Yield (tonnes/ha/year)

Supplied to Mill

FFB (tonnes/year)

%

Gunung Aru 3,233.00 2,946.98 28,049.40 15.65 28,049.40 100

Gunung Kemasan 3,726.01 3,347.92 42,223.64 16.17 42,223.64 100

Laut Timur 3,201.28 2,991.41 63,003.85 19.28 63,003.85 100


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Pantai Timur 3,342.00 3,093.49 69,042.08 22.32 69,042.08 100

Total 13,502.29 12,379.80 202,318.97 18.79 202,318.97 100

*Source Production Data on June 2013 –May 2014

1.5.3 Smallholder(s) and other source

Name of source(s)

Member(s) Location Total Area

(Ha) FFB

(tonnes/year)

Supplied to Mill

FFB (tonnes/year)

%

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

*Gunung Aru POM does not received FFB from other sources or smallholders

1.5.4 Product categories FFB/CPO/PK/PKO

1.6 Dates of Plantings and Cycles

1.6.1 Age profile of planted palms*

Tahun Tanam LUAS

Gunung Aru (Ha)

Gunung Kemasan (Ha)

Laut Timur (Ha)

Pantai Timur (Ha) Total (Ha)

1988 247.30 - 247.30

1989 449.11 - 449.11

1990 417.53 485.79 903.32

1991 387.25 865,01 1,252.26

1992 210.82 543,75 754.57

1993 170.64 163,70 334.34

1994 20.58 141,24 777,89 939.71

1995 - 122,33 540.10 662.43

1996 188,98 1.128,44 1.088.08 2,405.50

1997 49,61 253.91 303.52

1998 45,43 421,15 466.58

1999 185.06 185.06

2000 214.91 106.17 321.08

2003 - 56.53 121.21 177.74

2005 54.11 54,62 104.78 213.51

2006 - 452.56 452.56

2007 - 426.67 426.67

2010 270.56 - 270.56

2012 326.61 - 326.61

2013 424.65 247.1 671.75

2014 403.39 489.22 892.61

TOTAL 2,946.98 3.347.92 3,268.41 3,093.49 12,656.80

1.6.2 New Planting area after January 2010 - Ha

1.6.3 Planting Cycle 2ndCycle


ASSESSMENT REPORT


1.7 Approximate Tonnage Certified

1.7.1 Past Annual Claim Certified Product

FFB Production 226,669 Tonnes/year

CPO Production 52,700.62 Tonnes/year

Palm Kernel (PK) Production 11,333.47 Tonnes/year

Palm Kernel Oil (PKO) Production - Tonnes/year

1.7.2 Claim Certified Tonnage of FFB

Name of Estate(s) Total Area

(Ha) Planted Area

(Ha) FFB

(tonnes/year) Yield

(tonnes/ha/year)

Gunung Aru 3,233.00 2,946.98 21,896 12.22

Gunung Kemasan 3,726.01 3,347.92 35,981 13.78

Laut Timur 3,201.28 2,991.41 59,630 18.24

Pantai Timur 3,342.00 3,093.49 71,310 23.05

Total 13,502.29 12,379.80 188,817 17.54

Sumber data: Projection FFB July 2014 – June 2015 (next 12 months)

1.7.3 Claim Certified Tonnage of Palm Product

Name of Mill Capacity

(tonnes/ hour)

FFB Processed

(tonnes/ year)

CPO Palm Kernel PKO

Out put (tonnes)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tonnes)

Extraction (%)

Out put (tonnes)

Extraction (%)

Gunung Aru POM 40 188,817 43,900 23.25 9,941 5.00 - -

1.8 Other Certifications

1.8.1 ISO 9001:2008/ISO 14001: 2004 -

1.8.2 OHSAS 18001:2007 -

1.8.3 HACCP -

1.8.4 Others -

1.9 Time Bound Plan for Other Management Units

MANAGEMENT UNIT Estate (Supply Base)

Time Bound LOCATION P O M Time Bound

Sekunyir. PT. Indotruba Tengah

Certified 2010 Sekunyir Certified 2010 Seruyan and West Kotawaringin District – Central Kalimantan

Seruyan Certified 2010

Manggala. PT. Tunggal Mitra Plantations

Certified 2010 Manggala 1 Certified 2010 Rokan Hilir District – Riau

Manggala 2 Certified 2010

Manggala 3 Certified 2010

PT. Sime Indo Agro

Certified 2010 PT. Sime Indo Agro Certified 2010 Sanggau District –West Kalimantan

Teluk Siak. PT Aneka Inti Persada

Certified 2011 Teluk Siak Certified 2011 Pekanbaru, Siak District – Riau Pinang Sebatang Certified 2011


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Aneka Persada Certified 2011

Sungai Pinang. PT. Bina Sains Cemerlang

Certified 2012 Sungai Pinang Certified 2012 Musi Rawas District – South Sumatera Bukit Pinang Certified 2012

Sukamandang. PT. Kridatama Lancar

Certified 2011 Sukamandang Certified 2011 Seruyan and East Kotawaringin District – Central Kalimantan

Sapiri Certified 2011

Baras Danum Certified 2011

Kuala Kuayan Certified 2011

Pemantang. PT. Teguh Sempurna

Certified 2011 Pemantang Certified 2011 Seruyan and East Kotawaringin District – Central Kalimantan

Kawan Batu Certified 2011

Hatan Tiring Certified 2011

Batang Garing Certified 2011

Alur Dumai. PT Lahan Tani Sakti

Certified 2011 Alur Dumai Certified 2011 Rokan Hilir District – Riau

Teluk Bakau. PT. Bhumireksa Nusa Sejati

Certified 2011 Teluk Bakau Certified 2011 Indra Giri Hilir District – Riau

Nusa Perkasa Certified 2011

Nusa Lestari Certified 2011

Mandah. PT. Bhumireksa Nusa Sejati

Certified 2014 Mandah Certified 2011 Indra Giri Hilir District – Riau Rotan Semelur Certified 2011

Angsana Mini. PT Sajang Heulang

Certified 2011 KKPA-1 PT.SHE Certified 2013 Tanah Bumbu District – South Kalimantan

Pantai Bonati Certified 2011

Angsana. PT Ladangrumpun Suburabadi

Certified 2011 Angsana Certified 2011 Tanah Bumbu District – South Kalimantan

Gunung Sari Certified 2011

KKPA-4 PT.SHE Certified 2013

Mustika. PT Sajang Heulang

Certified 2013 KKPA-2 PT.SHE Certified 2013 Tanah Bumbu District – South Kalimantan



Gunung Aru. PT Bersama Sejahtea Sakti

Certified 2011 Gunung Aru Certified 2011 Kotabaru District – South Kalimantan

Gunung Kemasan Certified 2011

Laut Timur Certified 2011

Pantai Timur Certified 2011

Bebunga. PT. Langgeng Muaramakmur

Certified 2011 Sungai Cengal Certified 2011 Kotabaru District – South Kalimantan

Bebunga Certified 2011

KKPA Sungai Cengal

2014

Pondok Labu. PT Paripurna Swakarsa

Certified 2012 Binturung Certified 2012 Kotabaru District – South Kalimantan

Pondok Labu Certified 2012

Rampa Certified 2012

Sesulung Certified 2012

Selabak. PT Swadaya Andhika

Certified 2012 Selabak Certified 2012 Kotabaru District – South Kalimantan

Randi Certified 2012

Sangkoh Certified 2012

Lanting Certified 2012

Rantau. PT Laguna Mandiri

Certified 2012 Rantau Certified 2012 Kotabaru District – South Kalimantan

Matalok Certified 2012

Betung. PT Laguna Mandiri

Certified 2014 Betung Certified 2012 Kotabaru District – South Kalimantan Sekayu Certified 2012


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Ungkaya. PT Tamaco Graha Krida

Certified 2012 Ungkaya

Certified 2012 Morowali District – Sulawesi Tengah

Plasma TGK 2015

Ladang Panjang. PT Bahari Gembira Ria

Certified 2012 Ladang Panjang Certified 2012 Muaro Jambi District - Jambi Plasma BGR 2015

Rantau Panjang. PT Guthrie Pecconina Indonesia

Certified 2012 Rantau Panjang Certified 2012 Musi Banyuasin District – South Sumatera

Bumi Ayu Certified 2012

Karang Ringin Certified 2012

Napal Certified 2012

Mangun Jaya Certified 2012

KKPA Sungai Pinang

2015

Blang Simpo. PT Perkasa Subur Sakti

Certified 2013 Tamiang (PT PPP) Certified 2013 Aceh Tamiang and East Aceh District – Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam

Batang Ara ((PT PSK))

Certified 2013

Blang Simpo-01 (PT PPP)

Certified 2013

Blang Simpo-02 (PT PPP)

Certified 2013

MAS. PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera

2020 MAS 1 2020 Sanggau District – West Kalimantan

MAS 1 2020

MAS 1 2020

Lembiru. PT Sandika Nata Palma

Certified 2014 Lembiru Certified 2014 Ketapang District – West Kalimantan

Awatan Certified 2014

Pelanjau (PT BAL) 2014

Sungai Putih (PT BAL)

2014

Baturus (PT BAL) 2014

Sime Darby has achieved 39 managament units in Malaysia and 21 Management Units in Indonesia RSPO certified. There was change of the Time Bound Plan under Sime Darby cause the Sime Darby postpone the others certification process. Change of the Time Bound Plan explaination: PT Mitra Austral Sejahtera. There are social issue still unresolved from the Serikat Petani Kelapa Sawit (SPKS) Sanggau, however the improvement are in progress. Sime Darby has informed the Time Bound Plan progress, MUTUAGUNG has consider that Sime Darby still comply with the RSPO requirement for partial certification.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


2.0 ASSESSMENT PROCESS

2.1 Certification Body

PT Mutuagung Lestari

Jl. Raya Bogor Km 33,5 No. 19, Cimanggis - Depok 16953

Telp. +62-21-8740202; Fax +62-21-87740745/46

Website: www.mutucertification.comEmail : [email protected]

2.2 Assessment Team

2.2.1 Lead Assessor and Assessment Team

ST-2 1. Aryo Gustomo (Lead Assessor). 2. Muhammad Noor Efansyah (Assessor). 3. Henry Marpaung (Assessor). 4. Marsudi Eko Santoso (Assessor).

S-1 1. Oktovianus Rusmin (Lead Assessor Witnessed). 2. Octo H.P.N Nainggolan (Lead Assessor). 3. Ibnu Satria Prabudi (Assessor). 4. Rudi Ramdani (Observer).

S-2 1. Deni A. Novendi (Lead Auditor). Bachelor of Forestry majority for Natural Resources Conservation special in ecology and social. He involved in study of social economy of Citanduy-Cisanggarung watershed, Ciamis District, Province of West Java. And also have experience within 13 years in forest planning and conservation on forest concession at Indonesia. Since 2003, he worked for independent certification body as auditor for forest sustainable certification (FSC and LEI scheme); Chain of Custody, ISO 9001 and RSPO. He had audited of each certification scheme for some companies in Indonesia. In this assessment surveillance 2, he focused on environmental aspects, peat management and HCV management.

2. Marsudi Eko Santoso (Auditor) was in the previous assessment team member 3. Yudwi Wisnu Rahmanto (Auditor). Bachelor of Forestry with sivil culture background. He has attended in

selected training, such as Auditor/Lead Auditor Course Quality Management System (QMS) ISO 9001:2008, Timber Legality Assurance System (SVLK), Verification Organization Training C.A.F.E Practices (Starbucks), Organic Standard (EU, NOP, JAS), Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), Program Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) and Organic Exchange for Textile. He also has experience as an auditor and involved in certification program auditing, such as Sustainable Forest Management by FSC FM/COC Scheme, Coffee And Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E Practices) Starbucks, Sustainable Palm Oil by RSPO Scheme, Organic Standard (EU, NOP, JAS) for Coffee Farmer and Organic Exchange for Textile. Currently, he worked at Professional Certification Body and assigned to verify in Social aspect during this Assessment (S2).

4. Siti Jamilah (Observer). Master of Agribusiness Management, Bogor Agricultural University. She had experience as quality control in Food Manufacture, export supervisor in agriculture trading and technical expert in Consultant company. She had followed training such as Awareness RSPO, Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil auditor, food safety – HACCP and enterprise risk management.

S-3 1. Octo HPN Nainggolan (Lead Auditor) Indonesian citizen, Bachelor of Agriculture, majoring of Social Economics of Agriculture (Agribusiness). Seven years working experience since 2004 at oil palm Plantation Company in Indonesia and followed some trainings namely: Training of Conservation of Natural and Biological Resources in supporting HCV, Basic Plantation Management Program, Plantation Integrated Pest Management training, Management System Certification (ISO 9001-2008/SNI 19011-9001:2008), Environment Management System (ISO 14001:2004), SMK3 based on OHSAS, RSPO Lead Auditors Training Course endorsed by Proforest and Wildasia, Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) Lead Auditor training course, supply chain certification system training and RSPO Renewable Energy Directive Lead Auditor training. Currently he worked as an auditor at Certification Body. During this audit, he assigned to verify of legality, QMS, supply chain, safety and health, worker welfare and discrimination

http://www.mutucertification.com/mailto:[email protected]


ASSESSMENT REPORT


2. Trismadi Nurbayuto (Auditor). Bachelor of Economics from the Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Management, Bogor Agricultural University. Specialists for Environmental Social Impact Assessment (SEIA) and High Conservation Value (HCV). Has attended some training such as: HCV, Auditor for Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) training and Auditor/Lead auditor Management System Certification (ISO 9001-2008). Previously worked in the private oil palm plantations, became HCV assessor who registered at the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) until 2014. He has been involved in the SEIA and Identification of HCV in Plantation company. During this audit, he assigned to verify of Safety and health, environmental aspect and conservation.

3. Muhammad Rinaldi (Auditor Trainee). Associate of Oil Palm Plantations, Bogor Agricultural Institute. He have 4 years experience working as a staff operational plantations at private oil palm plantation companies in Indonesia. He has attended the RSPO Awareness training and training Auditor ISPO. During this audit, he assigned to verify of Best Management Practices aspect and and social aspect.

2.3 Assessment Methodology, Assessment Process and Locations of Assessment

2.3.1 Figure of person days to implement assessment

S2 Number of auditors : 3 auditors Number of days for S-2 at site : 4 days Number of working days for S-2 at site : 12 Working days

S3 Number of auditors : 3 auditors Number of days for S-3 at site : 4 days Number of working days for S-3 at site : 12 Working days

2.3.2 Detail process ofassessment

S1 The assessment was conducted by measuring the sufficiency of implementation with the consistency done by the Bersama Sejahtera Sakti (BSS) to the requirements of National Interpretation of the Republic of Indonesia from RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production (RSPO INA-NIWG, May 2008) and Supply Chain Requirement for CPO Mill. The assessment was conducted in three methods: (1) document review, aiming to observe the sufficiency of types or substances from required documents; (2) interview, aiming to obtain more detailed information and cross check the information; and (3) field check, aiming to observe directly the sufficiency of implementation on site. All information obtained was recorded in Check List of PT Mutuagung Lestari (MUTU) and became the main annex of Assessment Report.

S2 The assessment was conducted by measuring the sufficiency of implementation with the consistency done by the PT.Bersama Sejahtera Sakti to the requirements of National Interpretation of the Republic of Indonesia from RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production (RSPO INA-NIWG, May 2008 and Scheme Smallholders October 2009) and Supply Chain Requirement for CPO Mill The assessment was conducted in three methods: (1) document review, aiming to observe the sufficiency of types or substances from required documents; (2) interview, aiming to obtain more detailed information and cross check the information; and (3) field observation, aiming to observe directly the sufficiency of implementation on site. Some opportunities for improvement of the results S-2 delivered by the auditor MAL to the management unit and the results are the subject will be verified at the next assessment phase (S-2). Improvement of findings from main assesment findings were observed by auditors at this S-2 assessment. All information obtained was recorded in Check List of PT Mutuagung Lestari (MUTU) and part of S-2. The assessment program please find Appendix 2

S3 The objective of Surveillance-3 activity is to measure company’s efforts and consistency on complaining the national interpretation (Republic of Indonesia) over RSPO principle and criteria (P&C) RSPO on producing sustainable palm oil (RSPO INA-NIWG, Mei 2008). In addition, this activity is functioning to monitor improvement from previous surveillance.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


The assessment was conducted in 3 methods: Method I by reviewing documents; to review the completeness of type and substance over required document; and Method II is interview, to gain detail information and cross check; and Method III is field review/ visit, to directly observe the sufficiency of field implementation. The sample location for this certification is: 1 mill with 4 estates, which supply the fresh fruit bunches, such as Gunung Aru Estate, Bukit Kemasan Estate, Laut Timur Estate and Pantai Timur Estate. The audit team used the 0,8√y formulation to choose the main sample of the estate for the main evaluation. Based on this formulation, the audit team chooses 2 samples of estate, such as Gunung Aru Estate and Laut Timur Estate.

Some opportunities for improvement of the results Surveillance-3 delivered by the auditor MAL to the management unit and the results are the subject will be verified at the next assessment phase (Surveillance-4). All information obtained was recorded in Check List of PT Mutu agung Lestari (MUTU) and part of assessment report. Please find Appendix 2 for the assessment program.

2.3.3 Locations of Assessment

S-1 1. Location 1, Gunung Aru Palm Oil Mill. Observes the FFB processing and OHS implementation, hazardous and hazardous waste warehouse.

2. Location 2, Waste Water Treatment Plant. Observes the land application and waste water processing. 3. Location 3, HGU pole No.16 at block KK47 and pole No.61 at block JJ47, Pantai Timur estate.

Observes related to land use right pole maintenance. 4. Location 4, Hazardous waste warehouse at Laut Timur estate. Observes and interview with

warehouse officer related hazardous waste management. 5. Location 5, Chemical warehouse at Laut Timur estate. Observes and interview with warehouse officer

related to material safety implementation. 6. Location 6, Workshop and Diesel fuel tank at Laut Timur estate. Observes related to OHS

implementation and contamination management. 7. Location 7. Replanting at block C3 and D3 at Gunung Aru estate. Observes related to replanting

method and zero burning implementation. 8. Location 8, Fire Brigade and emergency response team at Laut Timur estate. Observes and

interview with firefighting officer related to preparedness of emergency response equipment. 9. Location 9. Bukit Kemasan HCV area at block D36 and D40, Gunung Aru estate. Observes and

interview with HCV officer regarding HCV 1.1 management and monitoring. 10. Location 10. Sungai Batak HCV area at block HH47, Pantai Timur estate. Observes and interview

with HCV officer regarding HCV 4 (riparian and buffer zone) management and monitoring. 11. Location 11. Sajakah village at Laut Timur estate. Interview with village peoples of Sajakah village

related to company social responsibility, work opportunity to village community, communication mechanism and customary rights.

12. Location 12. Tanjung Pengharapan village at Pantai Timur estate. Interview with village peoples of Tanjung Pengharapan village related to company social responsibility, work opportunity to village community, communication mechanism and customary rights

S-2 The locations in this certification activity are 1 POM with four Estates, which supply the raw material (FFB), namely the Gunung Aru Estate, Gunung Kemasan Estate, Laut Timur Estate and Pantai Timur Estate. In conducting the assessment, the team of auditors used the 0.8√y formula to determine the management units sampling to be focused on and also considered the issues raised by stakeholder. Based on this formula, the team of auditors determined that the estates sampling locations are two estates which areGunung Aru POM, Gunung Kemasan Estate and Pantai Timur Estate. 1. Location 1 - Hazardous Waste Storage Gunung Aru Factory. Observation, recording and symbol of

hazardous waste. Interview with officers regarding to clinical and domestic waste handling

2. Location 2 - Diesel TankGunung Aru Factory. Observation of handling and andprevention ofcontamination

ofinto environment. DieseltankatPOMis under construction of canopyinstallation.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


3. Location 3. Waste Water Treatment Plant. Observationof handling and utilization liquidwaste.

InterviewswithofficersWWTPabout recording, pond capacitycontrol, environmental parameters control,

andprevention ofleakageorseepageuncontrolled.

4. Location 4- Block O3 Gunung Kemasan Estate. Observation ofsoilerosionmonitoring sites.

InterviewwithAssistantDivision and HCV Officer about monitoring andrecording accordingfrequencyset.

5. Location 5 – Block V 02 Pantai Timur Estate .Observationof riparianmanagementasHCV area.

InterviewwithAssistantDivisionOfficerHCVabout rehabilitation effortthroughcontinuous planting, andmake

surethere are no chemical applicationsin surrounding area.

6. Location 6 -Block II 39 Pantai Timur Estate. observation of areas management that haveslopes

greaterthan40%. InterviewwithAssistantDivisionwith regard to managementandconservation measuresinthe area.

7. Location 7 .Block Q3 and Q 4 Gunung Kemasan Estate. Observation inreplanted areasrelated with zero

burningandeffortsof covering landto preventsoilerosion. InterviewwithAssistantDivisionrelated to theduration ofthe

land clearing andthe effortsto prevent soil damage duringland clearing.

8. Location 8.Workshop Central PTE, Office PTE Division II. ObservationsrelatedOHS (Occupational Health&

Safety) , PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), availabilityOilTrap, firefightingfacilities,

logo/symbolandOilWastemanagement of vehiclerepair.

9. Location 9- Genset Storage, Office PTE Division II. Observationsrelated tothe availabilityOilTrap that

managedresponsibly anduse ofPPE(ear muff) for theoperator.

10. Location 10 -Block Spraying System (BSS), Division II PTE.Observation ofchemical management, spray

equipment, facility and infrastructurespraying, washing of spray equipmentandlaunderingthe water and the use

ofsymbol and logo hazardous waste

11. Location 11 - Emplacement andChild Care, DivisionIIPTE. Observationsof employees emlacement(old

andnew) and Child Care.

12. Location 12 - Polyclinicunit, DivisionIIPTE. Observationsrelated tothe handling ofinfectious

waste/medicalclinicandeligibilityconditions.

13. Location 13 - WasteLandfill(TPAS) Domestic, BlockE39orD025DivisionIIPTE. Observation ofdomesticwaste

management.

14. Location 14 - DieseltankandChemicals storage,PTE. Observationsrelated tologosandsymbols hazardous

waste, early detection equipment of emergencyconditionsandchemicaldisposition.

15. Location 15 – BPN Boundaries PoleNo17BlockZ33DivisionIIandNo.8BlockW3DivisionIIIGKE. Observation

ofmaintenanceandavailability ofthe boundariesaround PTBSS area.

16. Location 16 - BlockQ4GKE. Observation oflow areaswithdrainagemanagementsystemCECT(Closed

EndedConservationTrenches).

17. Location 17 -Blok O3 GAE. Observation and interviewt about land application

18. Location 18 - BlockW11GKE. Observations of riparianarea managementBekambit river that havemanaged

well(perennialsplantedandBufferzonearea50M).

19. Location 19 - BlockW16GKE. Observationandinterviewswithseniorassistant about erosionrate

measurementswith pole erosion. Observationobliquearea managementwithselectiveweeding, Neprolephis and

midrib.

20. Location 20 - BlockW13GKE.Observationandinterviewsaboutthe use ofPPE, riparianareasthat should not

besprayed(for example inblockW11), trainingspray(specific pesticides), safetytraining, healthchecks, first aid

emergencybox, handlingpoisoningemergencies, wages, reproductive rights, protectionsexual harassment,

gender committeeandworkers' insurance.

21. Location 21 - Block V4GKE. Observationandinterviewswithforemenandworkers about cropstechniqueanduse of

PPE, wages, premiumsharvest, finesforraw andleft fruit, harvestquality by theforemanandoffice clerk, SPSI,

employeegrievance, risklaborandaccidents.

22. Location 22 - BlockR5GKE. Observationsandinterviewswithdriversandloadersabout OHS implementation


ASSESSMENT REPORT


anddriver's license (SIM). Suh as on driver's licenseType II, on behalf of HermamiNo.860 618 200 24

23. Location 23 BlockR 17. Observation oflow areas with drainage management system CECT (Closed

EndedConservationTrenches).

24. Location 24 Block R10.Observation ofowlnests. At the time ofobservationfoundan owl.

25. Location 25Batu Tunau village , interviews with community leaders regarding the benefits of the company's

existence, socialissues, land conflicts and CSR

26. Location 25 Sejakah village, interviews with community leaders regarding the benefits of the company's


27. Location 26 Bekambit village, interviews with community leaders regarding the benefits of the company's


S3 Audit team selects sample location. Sample location was selected by considering below aspect:

Total location was selected based on 0.8 √y formulation

The selected location represents each operation unit.

Consideration over rising issue from public consultation and document’s review, which is fundamental and

crucial.

GUNUNG ARU POM.

1. Gunung Aru palm oil mill. Observation on FFB management and processing operation and the implementation

of occupational health and safety facility and infrastructure, hazardous warehouse, hazardous wastes

warehouse.

2. Grading Station. Observation on sortation activity, which conducted by personnel and interview related to

sortation process and facility that provided by company for personnel.

3. Water Treatment Plant. Observation over clean water management, which is used for processing activity in mill

and domestic, as well as measuring water debt by using Flow Meter.

4. Mill’s workshop. Interview with workshop personnel regarding training, payment, social insurance, medical

check up and observation over first aid box provision.

5. Hazardous waste warehouse in Gunung Aru POM. Observation and interview with warehouse personnel

regarding the hazardous waste processing, hazardous waste management in the occurrence of work accident

and hazardous waste balance.

6. IPAL pond, Gunung Aru Mill. Observation related to IPAL ponds condition and wastewater management in

Gunung Aru palm oil mill and liquid waste application to blocks.

Laut Timur Estate:

1. Housing in Division 3. Observation regarding housing facility for personnel in division 3. There is 1 unit of

artesian well, which is used as drinking water source. Meanwhile water reservoir is used for water daily usage

(MCK). There is leakage of used oil surrounding generator hut, but company has cleaned and fixed it.

2. Bukit Marga Tarap (HCV4.2) at Block Z12/Z13. Company has cultivated 23 trees of mahoni vegetation in 2013;

in addition, at HCV area there are signboards, which explain the information over HCV4.2 symbol.

3. Bukit Mayat (HCV1.1) at Block Y12/13. During the observation, there are some Macaca fascularis and lutungs.

The vegetation is adequate; in addition there is a signboard, which explains the HCV1.1 symbols and restriction

for hunting.

4. Cemetery in Sungkai village (HCV6) at Block X19/20. There are some old cemeteries that considered sacred

by local community in Sungkai village. Cemeteries are surrounded by fence. In addition there is a signboard

being installed to inform the HCV6 symbol.

5. Riparian of Sejakah Tengah River (HCV4.1) at Blok Z19/A19. Company has cultivated forest vegetation and

installed information board/ signboard for HCV4.1 symbol. Company also put yellow paint as a mark on palm oil


ASSESSMENT REPORT


trees, which located 50 meters from river. But auditor team still found a mark of spraying along riparian area.

6. Housing in Division 2. Observation over personnel housing facility in division 2. It’s known that there is 1 unit of

artesian well as drinking water source; meanwhile water reservoir is used for water daily usage (MCK). In

addition, there is educational facility from kindergarten to junior high school.

7. Washing area for pesticide tools/ packages (Block Spraying System House), Laut Timur Estate.

Observation on controlling water pollution from knapsack and body protector washing by herbicide application

personnel.

8. Division 3 Block C37.

Observation on harvesting activity and the compliance over harvesting standard. Interview with foreman and

harvesting personnel regarding payment, safe work procedure that based on SOP, PPE provision, complain

mechanism, HCV socialization, occupational health and safety implementation, medical insurance and

freedom to establish and join union.

Observation on holistic pest control using Beneficial Plant such as Cassia cobanensis, Antigonon leptopus

and Turnera subulata, which are cultivatedin the edge of block.

9. Division 3 Block C32. Observation on soil fertility improvement using empty fruit bunches (JJK) and interview

with JJK personnel regarding working hour (07.00-14.00), the provided facility for personnel, such as childcare

and schools, the provision of reproduction right like 3 months maternity leave and 2 days menstrual pain leave as

well as gender committee.

10. Division 3 Block C33 and Block C38. Observation on holistic pest control by breeding owl (Tyto alba).

11. Division 3 Block C39.Observation over plantation maintenance, like spraying activity. From field visit and

interview with foreman and spraying personnel, personnel understand the spraying procedure and work

instruction. Personnel able to explain boundary for spraying activity (such as the area that is eligible to spray or

not), personnel also wear PPE when they work and the PPE will be washed after the work is done. Personnel

also following periodic medical check up every 6 months.

12. HGU stake No 6 (030 36’ 74” LS – 1160 10’ 49” BT). Observation regarding HGU existence and maintenance,

which is adjacent with production forest INHUTANI II. Stake is available and well maintained.


which is adjacent with production forest INHUTANI II. No stake can be found.


which is adjacent with production forest INHUTANI II. Stake is available but in a poor condition.



16. HGU stake No 16(030 37’ 87” LS – 1160 14’ 100” BT). Observation regarding HGU existence and maintenance,


17. HGU stake No179(030 35’ 28” LS – 1160 14’ 49” BT). Observation regarding HGU existence and maintenance,

which is adjacent with community’s estate. Stake is available but in a poor condition.

18. HGU stake No 18(030 35’ 21” LS – 1160 14’ 11” BT). Observation regarding HGU existence and maintenance,

which is adjacent with community’s estate. Stake is available and well maintained.

Gunung Aru Estate:

1. Housing Division 1& Division 2. Observation on personnel housing facility in division 1 and division 2. Clean

water comes from well, most of personnel house are built with concrete.

2. Riparian area in Bekambit Atas River (HCV4.1) at block A018. Riparian area through the length of 50 meter,

no replanting over riparian area and is left for natural vegetation habitat.

3. Riparian of Betung River (HCV4.1&HCV4.2) at block F03/D03. Riparian area through the length of 50 meter,

moreover, HCV4.2 condition is relatively slope >40%. In both areas, there were no replanting activities.

4. Bukit Kemasan (HCV4.2). During the observation, there are some HCV areas that cultivated by local


ASSESSMENT REPORT


community. These areas have been cultivated with banana tree and palm oil tree.

5. Division 3 hut. Observation over personnel housing facility in division 1 & division 2. Clean water source.

6. Division 1 Block A09.

Observation on harvesting activity and the compliance over harvesting standard. Interview with foreman and

harvesting personnel related to payment, safe work procedure and inline with SOP, PPE provisions,

complain mechanism, HCV socialization, occupational health and safety implementation, medical insurance

and freedom to establish and join union.

Observation on FFB’s transportation, interview with transport foreman explains that foreman understands

the work procedure for transporting FFB and utilization of PPE during work.

7. Division 1 Block A08.

Observation on activity to increase soil fertility using land application and interview with personnel. Based on

interview with personnel, land application has been implemented in accordance with the SOP and to prevent

leakage, there are 4 flatbeds near trench that not being applied. POME flows from mill to field is using pipe

and being daily monitored. During field visit, there is no leakage.

Observation on monitoring location for land erosion. Interview with division assistant to ensure monitoring

method and recording that inline with the required frequency.

8. Division 1 Block N04.

Observation over soil fertility improvement activity by applied empty fruit bunched. Its known that the

application is in accordance with procedure, which the empty fruit bunches application only 1 layer.

Observation on replanting area to ensure the implementation of zero burning and the effort to speed up land

covering process by cultivating Legume Cover Crop to prevent land erosion. At sloping area, the terrace was

established.

9. Division 1 Block A13. Observation on holistic pest control using Beneficial Plant, such as Cassia cobanensis,

Antigonon leptopus and Turnera subulata, which area cultivated in the edge of blocks

10. Division 1 Block N07. Observation over plantation maintenance such as spraying activity and interview with

spraying personnel regarding the work procedure for spraying, PPE usage, HCV socialization and gender

committee as well as the implementation of periodic medical check up.

11. HGU stake No 2 (030 29’ 58” LS – 1160 09’ 19” BT). Observation over HGU stake existence and maintenance,



which is adjacent with production forest INHUTANI II. Stake is available but stake’s number in the field is different

from HGU map.



14. HGU stake No 9(030 27’ 30” LS – 1160 10’ 39” BT). Observation over HGU stake existence and maintenance,


Visit to village and government institution.

Visit to Bekambit village. Interview with head of village (Mr. Misran) that informs the relationship between PT.

BSS and community in Bekambit village has been run well, as well as communication and complain from

community to company, work opportunity for local community and indigenous/ traditional right.

Visit to Sejakah village. Interview with head of village (Mr. Murhan) and chief of village supervision (Supiani)

informs that the relationship between PT.BSS and local community in Sejakah village has been run well, as well

as communication and complain from community to company, work opportunity for local community.

Visit to Lembaga Advokasi Masyarakat Saijaan (LAMAS).

Visit to Social, Manpower and Transmigration agency.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Visit to Forestry agency

Visit to Plantation agency

Visit to Local environment agency

2.4 Stakeholder Consultation and List of Stakeholders Contacted

2.4.1 Summary of stakeholder consultation process.

Public consultation process was carried out through two ways, namely: 1) Conducting a public announcement on MUTU website (www.mutucertification.com) 30 (2 May 2014) days at

minimum prior to the ASA -03 audit implementation. 2) Meeting with PT Bersama sejahtera sakti stakeholders has been done by directly visiting and consulting relevant

party on 3rd June 2014 (Sejakah and Bekambit village) and government institution like Forestry agency, Plantation agency, Environment agency, Social, Manpower and Transmigration agency and Lembaga Advokasi Masyarakat Saijaan (LAMAS). Furthermore, the inputs from stakeholders will be verified by PT. Bersama Sejahtera Sakti.

2.4.2 List of stakeholder contacted

Please findappendix3

2.5 Determining Next Visiting

The next visit (S-4) will be determined nine until twelve month after validity period of certificate S-3.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


3.0. ASSESSMENT RESULT 3.1. Summary of Assessment Report of the RSPO Certification

MUTUAGUNG LESTARI has conducted an assessment of Gunung Aru POM - PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti, MINAMAS Plantation – SIME DARBY Plantation operation consisting of one (1) mill and four (4) oil palm estates. During the assessment, there were three (3) nonconformity was assigned against Major Compliance Indicator, six (6) nonconformity was assigned against Minor Compliance and six (6) opportunities for improvement were identified. The three (3) nonconformity major and one (1) nonconformity minor has been closed and five (5) nonconformity minor will be verified on next ASA visit. Further explanation of the non-conformities raised and corrective actions taken by the company are provided in section 3.5. The company has already prepared and implemented the corrective action(s) that had been reviewed and accepted by Auditors in form of documentation evidences e.g. document /record/photographic.

MUTUAGUNG LESTARI found that Gunung Aru POM - PT Bersama Sejahtera Sakti, MINAMAS Plantation – SIME

DARBY Plantation Sdn Bhd complied with the requirements of RSPO Principles & Criteria and National Interpretation,

RSPO Principles and Criteria (P&C) for Sustainable Palm Oil Production, Republic of Indonesia - RSPO INA-NIWG, May

2008.

Therefore MUTUAGUNG LESTARI Recommends RSPO Certification of compliance is maintained.

Ref Std. VERIFICATION RESULT of MUTU-Certification

PRINCIPLE #1 COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY

1.1 Plantation and Palm Oil Factory have to give adequate information for stakeholders in appropriate language and forms, to ensure the effective participation of stakeholders in decision-making.

Company has SOP No. 034/BSS-SOP regarding the information request on 02nd May 2014 that explains the mechanism for information request from stakeholder, response over information, duration to response, type of document that can be given to stakeholder and flow chart for information request and response. For information request record and response, Gunung Aru Estate and Laut Timor Estate have personnel complain logbook and in/out letter logbook to record incoming complain letter and response from internal and external party. For instance: 1. Letter from head of Bekampit village No 21/KDB/PLT/03/2014 on 17-03-14 regarding the permit for open campaign 2. Letter from Sri J.N. on 12-12-2013 regarding the un transported waste and has been responded by EM on 12-12-2013 no

01/GAE-kry/XII/2013 regarding the information over damage on waste transportation vehicle. There is a result from management meeting about response letter from KUD Bersama Sejakah Makmur No: 004/KUD.BSM/IV/2013 on 25th April 2013, which consist of: 1. Blocking and stacking (LC) activity will soon to be proceeding as a real action to answer letter from head of village, KUD and

community leader. 2. Activity in nursery will sustain. PT.BSS Management orally delivers meeting result to head of village, KUD and community leader. Based on interview result with head of Bekambit and Sejakah village, the LC activity and nursery have been conducted by PT.BSS but there is an obstacle due to conservation area existence within plasma plantation scheme area. Company regulated document’s shelf life for 5 years, which stated in information request procedure, No: 034/BSS-SOP page 6, stated at point 6.

Status: Full Compliance


ASSESSMENT REPORT


1.2 Management documents are publicly available, except where this is prevented by commercial confidentiality or where disclosure of information would result in negative environmental or social outcomes.

Company has regulated the accessible document for public, which stated in information request procedure, No: 034/BSS-SOP page 6, stated at point 6. Type of document that can be accessed by stakeholder, such as:

Broad of LC, TBM, TM, infrastructure

Jamsostek payment receipt

Payment receipt for personnel medical treatment

General facility for personnel

Data of pest and disease attack

Data over light and heavy equipment

Data of supporting machine

Data over implemented CSR

Bridge data

Length of road data

Data over office building

Data over general building

Data over school’s building

Type of used fertilizer

Type of used agrochemical

Data of SKU personnel

Data of student

Plantation business permit

AMDAL document Company regulates document’s shelf life for 5 years, which stated in information request procedure, No: 034/BSS-SOP page 6, stated at point 6


PRINCIPLE #2 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

2.1 There is compliance with all applicable local, national and ratified international laws and regulations.

Company tries to fulfil the entire regulation that related to mill and estate operation activity, for instance: 1. AMDAL document (environment impact analysis) as required by PermenLH 11/2006 regarding the type of business plan and

the required AMDAL activity. 2. Permit to utilize liquid waste from palm oil industry to palm oil plantation by Kotabaru Reagent Number 188.45.296/KUM/2011

(permit extension) valid until Augustus 2016. 3. Permit for hazardous waste temporary storage by Kotabaru Reagent Number 188.45/192/KUM/2010, which valid until April

2015. 4. IUP. Decision letter from Kotabaru Reagent Number.188.45/389/KUM in 2009 regarding “Approval on PT. Bersama Sejahtera

Sakti re registration over plantation business license (IUP) in Kotabaru district” on 15th October 2009 for palm oil commodity, with a broad of 12.740,54 Ha and 1 unit processing of 60 Ton FFB/Hour, which located in Betung/Sejakah/Batu Tunau village, Pulau Laut Timur sub district, Kotabaru district.

Certificate holder has under taken some efforts to comply the changes in regulation, such as: 1. Minimum wage for palm oil plantation business amount Idr. 1.675.000, - that in accordance with of Kalimantan Selatan

Governor decision letter Number 188.44/0595/KUM/2013 on 24th December 2013. 2. Conducted ISPO certification assessment (Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil) on 21-24th April 2014 that inline with ministry of

agriculture regulation No.19 in 2011 regarding the ISPO. PT. Bersama Sejahtera Sakti has a documented evaluation over regulation compliance on May 2014, which drafted by PSQM KPW Banjarbaru staff (Yep Supriyanto) and covers 109 list of regulations and its description over related regulation, compliance status


ASSESSMENT REPORT


(Yes/No), compliance evidence (document/reference program) and description. Internal audit in each stage was carried out to conduct evaluation over legal regulation compliance. Monitoring matrix was used to monitor the implementation of regulation obedience. Department PSQM Minamas Plantation periodically evaluates the obedience over applicable regulation.


2.2 The right to use the land can be demonstrated, and is not legitimately contested by local communities with demonstrable rights

During Surveillance-03 there is no change over land ownership in a form of HGU, which is managed by certificate holder, such as

12.740,54 Ha areas, which consist of 4 HGU locations.

1. Decision letter from head of local land agency No.22/HGU/BPN/92regarding ”granting business license on behalf of PT.

Bersama Sejahtera Sakti, over the land in Kotabaru district” on 20th Augustus 1992 for 8.222,54 Ha land/areaand valid for 30

years in Langkang lama/Langkang Baru/Betung/Bekambit Hilir/Bekambit Hulu/Sungakai/Sejakah village, Pulau Laut Timur sub

district, Kotabaru district, Kalimantan Selatan province.

2. Decision letter from head of local land agency No.9/HGU/BPN/2002 regarding ”granting business license over the land in

Kotabaru district” Kalimantan Selatan province on 11th March 2002 for 3.318 Ha land/areaand valid for 35 years in Pulau Laut

Timur sub district, Kotabaru district, Kalimantan Selatan province.

3. Decision letter from head of local land agency, Kalimantan Selatan Province No.01-540.2-43-2003 regarding ”granting business

license on behalf of PT. Bersama Sejahtera Sakti, over the land in Kotabaru district” on 20th November 2003 for 100 Ha

land/areaand valid for 35 years in Bekambit village, Pulau Laut Timur sub district, Kotabaru district, Kalimantan Selatan

province.

4. Decision letter from head of local land agency No.62/HGU/BPN/2004 regarding ”granting business license over the land in

Kotabaru district” Kalimantan Selatan province on 15th September 2004 for 1.100 Ha land/areaand valid for 35 years in Pulau

Laut Timur sub district, Kotabaru district, Kalimantan Selatan province.

Related to OFI during Surveillance-02: PT BSS is recommended to maintain periodic communication with BPN Kalimantan

Selatan in order to figure out BPN comment and response over the request to revise measurement on plantation area.

Explanation for follow up actions above, such as:

a. Inline with letter of measurement request for PT. BSS HGU, which covers an area of ± 529 Ha No.010/BSS/UM/PSD/I/14 on

10th January 2014 from PT BSS to head of National Land Agency office in Kalimantan Selatan province, which explains:

Refers to decision letter over HGU No.22/HGU/BPN/92 on 20th Augustus 1992 for an area of ±8.222,540 Ha that explains

within the HGU location, there are some enclave areas, at present these entire areas have been compensated.

b. For an area of ±651 Ha, the HGU cannotbe processed because some area is included in IUPHHK-HA PT. Inhutani and 236 Ha

is included in PT.BSS plasma plantation scheme plan.

Field observation during surveillance-03 points out that in Division-1 Gunung Aru Estate (4 boundary spots no 2, 7, 30, 9) not entire

HGU stakes are available, but based on observation over operational boundary, the area has been clearly demarcated and the

managed area by BSS not exceeding legal boundary (HGU), Certificate holder has an opportunity to consistently maintain

legal boundary that in accordance with its operational boundary maintenance program. OFI.2014.01

Following the observation result of Surveillance-02, there is a response letter from Kotabaru Reagent No: 525/138/DISBUN/2013 on

19th March 2013 related to the realization of compensation payment for 221 Ha area to Hj. Alfisah that has been explained in land

compensation agreement on 17th December 2013.

From Surveillance-02 to Surveillance-03, there is one compensation process or land release on behalf of Hj. Alfisah. The entire land

release record for BBS operation area’s clearance is available and well stored by certificate holder.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


No revision over procedure for conflict resolution settlement that is accepted by both parties.


2.3 Use of the land for oil palm does not diminish the legal rights, or customary rights, of other users, without their free, prior and informed consent.

There is no traditional right within PT. BSS area, this is supported by letter from national land agency of Kota Baru district on 23rd

June 2010, which states that until now, land status especially in Kota Baru district has no traditional/ indigenous right; related to this

letter, its known that the entire HGU areas that issued by national land agency have no traditional/ indigenous right. Based on

interview with head of Bekambit village and head of Sejakah village, area of PT BSS there no areal with indigenous rights.


PRINCIPLE #3 Commitment to long-term economic and financial viability

3.1 There is an implemented management plan that aims to achieve long term economic and financial viability.

Company has a financial plan that stated in budget 2014/2015 and projection for 2016-2019.

GAE and LTE:

Regarding the planted area, stock that can be cultivated, fixed cost, direct cost, mature replanting,

Company also has financial policy that applied in entire estate, which states that financial budget preparation ought to consider

internal and external factor.

For instance GAE and LTE, there is budget plan 2014/2015 and budget projection 2014/2018, which prepared by estate manager

and approved by GM. Financial report explains the projection production, yield, number of seed, production cost. Production plan

for 3 years ahead is quite decline but nursery cost is increase, because company has a replanting program.

Company has long-term replanting program for period 2010 – 2030. Seeds come from Marihat palm oil research centre and the

nursery is conducted in Pantai Timur Estate, and will be distributed to entire estates.

In Gunung Aru Estate, replanting program has been conducted in 2009/2010 and replanting projection is available until

2018/2019 as well as the replanting location map. In 2010/2011, there is no replanting because the realization of replanting in

2009/2010 was delayed, the replanting activity will continue in 2010.

In Gunung kemasan Estate, replanting program was conducted in 2012/2013 and replanting projection is available until

2023/2024 as well as the replanting location map. Until March 2013, the implemented replanting is 198 Ha and 29,112 trees.

In Pantai Timur Estate, replanting program is conducted in 2014/2015 and replanting projection is available until 2022/2023 as

well as the replanting location map.

In Laut Timur Estate, replanting program is conducted in 2014/2015 and replanting projection is available until 2027/2028 and

as well as the replanting location map.


PRINCIPLE #4 Use of appropriate best practices by growers and millers

4.1 Operating procedures are appropriately documented and consistently implemented and monitored.

There are plantation SOP, which stated in SOP palm oil cultivation agronomic manual reference No. Policy; 110/EST-ARM/13, which consist of 18 chapter/part regarding the palm oil cultivation technic that based on Head of plantation Upstream Indonesia memorandum on 01st September 2013. SOP explains the entire operation activities, such as land clearing, cultivation material, maintenance and harvesting.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Company has mill’s SOP that stated in SOP System Pengolahan Kelapa Sawit dalam Pedoman Teknik Pabrik Kelapa Sawit, which consists of 3 chapters. First chapter (No. Policy 110/POD-FAC/07) and second chapter (No. Policy 120/POD-FAC/07) explains the SOP for palm oil management technic, meanwhile the third chapter (No. Policy 130/POD-FAC/07) explains administrative procedure in entire mill’s operation activity. BSS conducting the evaluation and assessment over operation activity, such as: 1. Plantation Adviser’s Report in Laut Timur Estate, evaluation on 25-28th July 2013 No. LAUT TIMUR ESTATE

PAR/MINAMAS/LTE/02/2012-13 by Kenneth Sreedharan. Based on evaluation result, its required too implement improvement on harvesting interval, improvement over holistic pest control, improvement on plantation operation monitoring. Manager has a response for the evaluation result.

2. Plantation Adviser’s Report in Gunung Aru Estate, evaluation on 17-20 March 2014 No. SOU-06 by Kenneth Sreedharan. The evaluation was conducted in entire operation, from replanting activity, production, and maintenance. Manager has a response for the evaluation result.

3. Mill Advisory Report PKS Gunung Aru on 12-13 March 2013 conducted the evaluation for mill’s operation activity, facility and supporting infrastructure, housing facility. Manager has a response for the evaluation result.

Record over entire operation activity has been documented in a form of monthly report for mill and estate. Report in April 2014 consists of: 1. Monthly Report PKS Gunung Aru consists of manager comment, FFB acceptance, production data, production quality & loss,

production cost, personnel and housing, stock and budget recapitulation. 2. Monthly report for Gunung Aru Estate and Laut Timur Estate for operation activity record, which consists of areal statement,

program and the actual field operation activity, recapitulation over operational cost, and CSR program.

Based on field visit at Laut Timur Estate Division 3 Block C37 and interview foreman and harvesting personnel, the SOP has been known were implemented properly.


4.2 Practices maintain soil fertility at, or where possible improve soil fertility to, a level that ensures optimal and sustained yield.

1. Leaf analysis record: Leaf sample pick up is conducted once a year in each division. Periodic record for leaf analysis result is in a form of Laporan Pengujian Analisa Jaringan Tanaman document by Minamas Research Centre in February 2014 for Gunung Aru Estate and in March 2014 for Laut Timur Estate. These documents explain data of division, block, LSU number, broad, planting year, number of plant, plantation population per hectare, type of soil, percentage of Ash, N, P, K, Mg, CA, and N material.

2. Soil analysis record:

Soil analysis sample pick up in Gunung Aru Estate for Land application area is conducted once a year. Soil analysis result Number 081/UN8.2.1/PL/2014 by Lambung Mangkurat University on 25th February 2014, which explains soil texture, percentage of C, N, Ca, Mg, and P2O5 material. Gunung Aru Estate and Laut Timur Estate have final report for land monitoring survey and evaluation on land suitability class for palm oil plantation in 2005, which explain land classification based on topography, soil type, land suitability class and land management method. Gunung Aru estate has a report on land suitability study at replanting area in July 2010, which was conducted by Minamas Research Centre. This report explains type of soil, sloping, boundary factors, management strategy and land spreading map.

PT.BSS has a record on realization of activities to sustain and improve land fertility, such as: Gunung Aru Estate: 1. Land application based on land application permit No. 188.45/296/KUM/2011 on 8th Augustus 2011-2016, with a broad of area

115 ha with application block N02, N03, N04, N05, N06, O04, O05, O06, O07, P07 and P08. 2. Empty fruit bunches is applied in replanting area and TM in each division. For instance in replanting area at block A011 division

1. In January 2014 there is empty fruit bunch application amount 803.400 Kg with a broad of area 19,472 Ha and in TM block A031 area division III there is empty fruit bunches application amount 68,48 Kg with a broad of area 2,53 Ha.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


3. Realization and fertilization program (period 2013/2014) is available in monthly report. For instance, fertilization with RP fertilizer for period 2013/2014: program 58.484 Kg above 271 Ha’s area; realization until April 2014 amount 58.484 Kg above 271 Ha’s area.

Laut Timur Estate: 1. Empty fruit bunches application is conducted in accordance with existing program and being recorded every month in monthly

report. In Laut Timur Estate there is EFB Application program amount 13.785,78 Ton above 395,73 Ha’s area; realization unti l April 2014 amount 2.127,91 ton above 66,69 Ha’s area.

2. Realization and fertilization program is available for period 2013/2014. For instance, fertilization with HGFB fertilizer for period 2013/2014: program 24.512 Kg above 3.268,41 Ha’s area; realization until April 2014 amount 24.512 Kg above 3.268,41 Ha’s area.


4.3 Practices minimize and control erosion and degradation of soils.

There are land maps for Laut Timur estate (1:50.000) and Gunung Aru estate (1.55.000), which explain land spreading with criteria:

- Gunung Aru Estate: Land series Land order Slope Broad Suitability Class Management type

MM-08 Typic Plinthudults Ultisol 15-20% 2.499 S3 Reducing erosion & run-off

Improvement over land fertility

Fertilization management

MM-10 Lithic Hapluduts Ultisol 15-20% 233 N1 Reducing erosion & run-off



MM-23 Plintic Eutrudox Oxisol 15-20% 786 N1 Reducing erosion & run-off



MM-24 Vertic Dystrudepts Inceptisol 0-8% 271 N1 Water management



Explanation for criteria is stated in final report on land monitoring survey and evaluation on land suitability class for palm oil plantation at Gunung Aru Estate in 2005. 2. Laut Timur Estate

Land series Land order Slope Broad Suitability Class Management type

MM-08 Typic Plinthudults Ultisol 15-20% 3.919 S3 Reducing erosion & run-off



MM-25 Oxcaquic Dyserudepys

Inceptisol 0-8% 46 N1 Reducing erosion & run-off



MM-26 Humic Psammentic Dystrudepts

Inceptisol 0-8% 109 N1 Water management



ASSESSMENT REPORT



Explanation for criteria is stated in final report on land monitoring survey and evaluation on land suitability class for palm oil plantation at Laut Timur Estate in 2005. PT. BSS has management strategy for certain sloping area, such as:

- Reducing erosion & surface run-off by sustaining vegetation with selective weeding, installation of terrace, establishment of slit pit, empty fruit bunches application to improve land fertility and cultivation of nut’s vegetation (Legume Cover Crop).

- Gunung Aru conducting the measurement for monthly land erosion at block O03, there are 2 spots, N5 has 1 spot and N6 has 1 spot. For measurement in 2014, there is no land declining or addition at monitoring stake.

- Based on field visit at block N05, there is a proof over implementation of sloping area management, such as establishment of terrace, empty fruit bunches application and cultivation of nut’s vegetation.

PT. BBS has road maintenance program and realization, which is stated in monthly report in each estate. For instance in Gunung Aru Estate there is road maintenance program for period 2013-2014 along 58.180 Meter and has been implemented along 41.500 Meter on the Access Road, Main Road and Collection Road. Based on field visit, road maintenance in PT.BSS has been done mechanically by using Road Grader and stones hoarding.


4.4 Practices maintain the quality and availability of surface and ground water.

BSS has conducted the effort to protect water flow and wet land including riparian area, such as: 1. The selection over Buffer zone in riparian area along 50 meter, regular monitoring over river’s water and mill’s liquid waste as

well as monitoring over water utilization for mill’s operation activity. 2. Company has a policy to protect sloping area & river’s supporting area, which is endorsed by Head Plantation Upstream

Indonesia in December 2011 that contains protection for riparian areas, and the edges of riparian area will be managed with criteria; for huge river, the broad is 100 M and Small River, the broad is 50 M.

BSS conducting monitoring over water management by applying the policy in buffer zone area and water source, such as: 1. Creation of buffer zone boundary as a boundary sign for spraying activity and fertilization should be executed 50 meters from

water source boundary. Based on interview with spraying personnel, the entire spraying personnel have understood the boundary area for application along riparian area.

2. Cultivating natural and local vegetation, for instance in GAE: monitoring on 29th January 2014, there are 61 types of sungkai and 21 types of turi that still alive at block A013.

3. Conducting periodic monitoring over river water in the headwater and downstream like on Bekambit River, Sejakah River and Api-Api River.

4. Company not cultivating vegetation along riparian area during replanting. Overlay map over replanting area and HCV in GAE show that HCV area (riparian of Betung river and riparian of Bekambit river) doesn’t have replanting. Moreover, based on field visit at block A018 (SS. Bekambit); F03, D03, A03 (SS. Betung and sloping >40%) and package prove at block E2 there is no replanting activity.

Gunung Aru mill has 5 ponds on water waste installation management (IPAL/WWTP) and has conducted monitoring over mill’s liquid waste BOD and monthly examination by research centre and industrial standardization of Banjar Baru District, Kalimantan Selatan province, like examination on 15th April 2013 at pond no 5 (outlet), which is pond before being flowed to land application. Examination result shows pH 7,2 and BOD 720 mg/L, which means the waste is still inline with standard regulation pH 6-9 and BOD < 5.000 mg/L (Kepmen LH No 28 in 2003) Data over water utilization in Gunung Aru mill is monitored and is recorded in production monitoring and recapitulation document GAF in 2014. Water utilization in GAF until May 2014 amount 106.904 M3 with number of processed FFB IS 89.281 Ton. Water utilization per ton FFB is 1,197 M3/Ton, which still above water utilization budget in GAF that is 1,1 M3/Ton. There is an evaluation on water utilization for reducing water utilization, which conducted by Mdr Lab & QC, Sr. Assistant and Pjs.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Manager GAF. For instance: 1. In order to control water utilization not exceeding the projection. The preventive actions such as installing electrical and

mechanical limit control 2. Replacing broken Valve / water tap 3. Fixing and replacing the broken or damage water installation in order to avoid water lose.


4.5 Pests, diseases, weeds and invasive introduced species are effectively managed using appropriate Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques.

PT. BSS implements PHT program, such as: 1. Cultivation of 3 Beneficial Plants, such as Cassia cobanensis, Antigonon leptopus andTurnera subulata. 2. Breeding natural predator for rats by establishing owl (tyto alba) nest box. 3. Implementing Early Warning System by conducting pest and disease census such as fire caterpillar census, rat census,

Oryctes census and Ganoderma census. Based on field visit at block C037 and C033 division 3 LTE, there are some beneficial plants, which are cultivated in the edge of Main Road and Collection Road as well as well maintained Nest Box. Monitoring record for PHT broad, such as: 1. Data for Beneficial Plant cultivation is stated in monthly report, which explaining number of existing vegetation and its

development. For instance, in LTE number of Beneficial Plantation until April 2014: Antigonon leptopus (53,58 Km), Cassia cobanensis (130,13 Km) and Turnera subulata (159,36 Km) and road ration with ratio Beneficial Plant cultivation is 0.45.

2. Data on Box Owl Barn (BOB) is stated in monthly report, which explaining number of existing BOB and number of habituated BOB. Until April 2014, LTE has 231 units BOB with 105 units habituated BOB for 3.268,41 Ha’s area.

3. Periodic pest census result is available. For instance in GAE, rat census in April 2014 at block K2 with 197 trees, the attacked trees is 39 trees (19,8 %), the attacked trees that exceeding the attack threshold have been treated with chemical material l ike Rodenticide with an active Warfarin material, for instance in Block K2 has been applied once with total volume 45,49 Kg.

PR. BSS conducted PHT training, such as: Laut Timur Estate: Company has conducted holistic pest control (PHT) training on 03rd February 2014 with 4 participants in Division II LTE. Training was about fire caterpillar and rats control, fire caterpillar and rat’s census method, and the impact of fire caterpillar and rats attack on palm oil plantation. Gunung Aru Estate: Company has conducted holistic pest control (PHT) training on 22nd January 2014, which explained pest census method. PT. BSS has conducted toxicity monitoring for its agrochemical and stated in pesticide utilization document, which informs the pesticide toxicity value per Ha and ton FFB, for instance: 1. Gunung Aru Estate

The utilization of Prima Up from July 2013 to April 2014 is 1799 Litter (active material 863,52 L), with an active Glyphosate material 480 g/L, Broad 2.947 Ha, total FFB 16.003,43 ton, dose 0,61 l/Ha, active material/ha 0,29 and active material per ton FFB is 0,053.

2. Laut Timur Estate The utilization of Kenlon from July 2013 to April 2014 is 1.648 L (active material 791,04 L), with an active Triklopir material 480 g/L, Broad 3.268 Ha, total FFB TBS 57.231,10 ton, dose 0,5 L/Ha, dose per active material/Ha 0,24 L/ha and active material per ton FFB is 0,013.

Based on document’s review, certificate holder able to re evaluate the pesticide toxicity monitoring (active material /LD50 per ton FFB or Ha) that not conducted yet as Sime Ebor Baits (Wafarin). OFI.2014.02

Refers to OFI No.2014.02


4.6 Agrochemicals are used in a way that does not endanger health or the environment. There is no prophylactic use of


ASSESSMENT REPORT


pesticides, except in specific situations identified in national Best Practice guidelines. Where agrochemicals are used that are categorized as World Health Organization Type 1A or 1B, or are listed by the Stockholm or Rotterdam Conventions, growers are actively seeking to identify alternatives, and this is documented.

Based on document’s review and field visit, company use agrochemical material that has been registered at pesticide commission, which can be proved with the registration number, for instance:

1. Kenlon 480 EC, active material: Triklopir; Registration number: RI. 01030120062433 2. PRIMA UP 480 AS, active material: Isopropyl amino glyphosate; Registration number: RI. 01030120031779

PT. BSS has recorded pesticide utilization for used agrochemical, which stated in pesticide utilization document. This document informs the applied area, application broad, application rotation, type of used pesticide and its volume, for instance:

1. Gunung Aru Estate The utilization of Prima Up from July 2013 to April 2014 is 1799 Litter (active material 863,52 L), with an active Glyphosate material 480 g/L, Broad 2.947 Ha, total FFB 16.003,43 ton, dose 0,61 l/Ha, active material/ha 0,29 and active material per ton FFB is 0,053. 2. Laut Timur Estate The utilization of Kenlon from July 2013 to April 2014 is 1.648 L (active material 791,04 L), with an active Triklopir material 480 g/L, Broad 3.268 Ha, total FFB TBS 57.231,10 ton, dose 0,5 L/Ha, dose per active material/Ha 0,24 L/ha and active material per ton FFB is 0,013.

PT BSS has MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) document for used chemical material. MSDS explains product identity, physical and chemical information, information on medical risk, first aid guideline for poisoning, safety instruction and utilization guideline. Rodenticide with an active Warfarin material has been used, which categorized on pesticide 1B WHO class amount 380 Kg until April 2014. On division II Gunung Aru Estate. Company’s efforts to reduce the utilization of Rodenticide, such as: 1. Enhancing the control by using natural predator by establishing Nest Box (owl nest) 2. Protecting plantation by cover palm oil trees with plastic to cover them from rats attack.

PT.BSS has delivered training for spraying personnel, for instance: LautTimurEstate: Training for spraying personnel on 07th January 2013, which attended by 14 participants. The training was explaining the utilization of PPE, restriction to spray along riparian area and spraying technic. Gunung Aru Estate: Training for spraying personnel on 26th October 2013, which attended by 13 participants. The training was explaining the utilization of PPE, the procedure for spraying and calibration method for spraying tools. PT BSS has SOP for hazardous and non hazardous waste management. This SOP regulates the procedure for managing hazardous and non hazardous waste, including used pesticide packages. PT BSS only managing used pesticide packages by temporarily store them before handed to waste collector. PT BSS has 2 (two) permit for hazardous waste warehouse (number 188.45/449/KUM/2011 and number 188.45/192/KUM/2010) from Kotabaru reagent. Based on field visit, auditor team concludes the hazardous waste management is in accordance with the applicable regulation. For instance: warehouse setting, waste arrangement based on type and further delivery to licensed collector (PT. Sinar Bintang Albar with decision letter No 080 in 2013). Certificate holder able to re evaluate hazardous waste management like the utilization of vehicle for transporting hazardous waste should inline with the applicable permit letter. Refers to OFI 2014.05 Company conducting periodically medical check up for spraying and harvesting personnel once a year. Latest medical check up result in 2013, for instance: 1. Medical check up for Dinah Sulasih on 26th October 2013 by Mandiri Healthy Care Clinic with Cholinesterase examination

result 62,5% (standard 75-100%) and stated “FIT” with a reminder to avoid pesticide Organophosphate work for 2 weeks.

There is a position mutation letter from assistant to Dinah Sulasih on 01st November 2013, mutation from BSS team to maintaining team until further recommendation from physician.


ASSESSMENT REPORT


Company also has a policy to restrict pregnant and lactating personnel working with chemical material like spraying and fertilization. Based on field visit and interview with female personnel, there personnel mention that they have received socialization over this policy and they understand this policy well. There is a letter from GAE manager No 07/GAE/V/2014 on 01st May 2014 regarding the mutation for Ms. Siti Nurhadiyah to light maintaining work and free from toxicity because she is pregnant.

Refers to OFI No.2014.05


4.7 An occupational health and safety plan is documented, effectively communicated and implemented.

Company has set and socialize the occupational health and safety (K3) policy, which is endorsed by CEO of Minamas Plantation on

5th July 2008, which stated:

Commitment:

Company is responsible to implement the occupational health and safety (K3) program in the entire mill and estate operation units.

To achieve this goal, company has set the operation procedure in each estate and mill. This commitment is applied in company’s

efforts to comply occupational health and safety regulation and will perform sustainable improvement as an effort to control risk as

well as to manage plantation business.

JAMSOSTEK payment receipt in GAE, LTE and PKS, for instance:

- GAE for monthly payment in April 2014 for 465 personnel.

- LTE for monthly payment in April 2014 for 407 personnel.

- PKS Gunung Aru for monthly payment in February 2014 for 133 personnel.

Type of training for GAE and LTE: harvesting, maintenance, fertilization, spraying, FFB sortation, fire extinguisher, pollution

prevention, general occupational health and safety, occupational health and safety for chemical material, first aid, occupational

health and safety for electricity and occupational health and safety management.

PT. BSS has occupational health and safety procedure for fire emergency response SS-02, on 20th May 2010, which prepared by

manager, Sr. Assistant, Assistant. The establishment of fire extinguisher unit, duties and responsibilities (fire extinguisher officer, fire

control team, coordinator, occupational health and safety expert, evacuation team, and first aid team), potential location for fire,

assembly point for emergency condition (form up point) and danger sign (for instance, bell). In addition, PT. BSS has placing first

aid trained personnel in working location such as: harvesting foreman, foreman I, harvesting clerk, fertilization foreman, Workshop

personnel, personnel and mill’s laboratory personnel.

Company has set and socialize the occupational health and safety (K3) policy, which is endorsed by CEO of Minamas Plantation on

5th July 2008, which stated:

Commitment:

Company is responsible to implement the occupational health and safety (K3) program in the en

Documents

Betung Village, Sub District of Pulau Laut Timur, District of Kotabaru, Province of KalimantanSelatan. Certificate Code : MUTU-RSPO/005 Date of certificate issue : July 05, …