p1 2011conf Pres

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    1/28

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    2/28

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    3/28

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    4/28

    Internal control

    Professionalism

    Risk

    Accountability

    Corporateethics

    Governance

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    5/28

    REVIEW OF

    PAST EXAMS

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    6/28

    WHAT WAS

    DONE WELL?

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    7/28

    Q1 on Global Bank: (b) on internal control failures, (c) onagency theory.

    Q3(a)(i) on ways a director can leave service and (c) oncriticise the CEOs reward package.

    Q4(a)(i) on roles of risk manager.

    June 2009

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    8/28

    Q1 was about the Mary Jane. (a) on AAA 7-step model, (b) oninternal control failures.

    Q2 (Ding Co) (a) on content of a directors induction

    programme.

    Q3 (a) on integrity.

    Q4 (a) on risk embeddedness (although not on application toSaltoc)

    December 2009

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    9/28

    Q1 was on Hesket Nuclear. (b) on trade unions (after anarticle I wrote in Student Accountant), (c) on agency, (d)(i) onsocial and environmental footprint (but not on construct acase).

    Q2 (a) on criticising the remuneration committee, (b)components of rewards package. Less well on alignment withshareholders interests.

    Q3 (c) define internal audit testing.

    June 2010

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    10/28

    Q1(a)(i) on why institutional investors might intervene incompany management.

    Q2(c) on strategic and operational risk.

    Q3(a) on conflict of interest and John Soria taking up a NEDpost at KK Limited.

    Q4(a) on liquidity risk.

    December 2010

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    11/28

    Core CG themes done better than some other areas

    Knowledge marks and level 1 verbs

    Timekeeping little evidence of struggling for time

    Most organise material well in answer preparation

    Questions similar to those asked previously (such asdescribing internal control failures in a case)

    Overall, things well done

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    12/28

    WHAT WASNT

    DONE WELL?

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    13/28

    Q1(a) about the rogue trader at Global Bank: candidates hadquestion spotted that Kohlberg wouldnt come up in thispaper. (d) about narrow and wide stakeholders. (e) about the

    roles of the CEO in internal control.

    Q2 on assess the ethical threats and (d) on deep greenperspective.

    Q3: (d) criticise the chairmans performance.

    June 2009

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    14/28

    Q1 on the Mary Jane. (c) on NEDs, (d)(i) on information oncontrols and risks and (d)(ii) on the qualities of information.

    Q2 (c) on Arif Zamans understanding of the role of chairman.

    Q3 (b) Criticise Potto Sinters ethical behaviour. Answerswere too descriptive.

    December 2009

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    15/28

    Q1 (a) on voluntary and involuntary stakeholders.

    Q2 (c) on voluntary reduction in pension value

    Q4 on Happy and healthy mostly done poorly.

    June 2010

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    16/28

    Q1(c) all three parts.- (i) confusion over sound corporate governance- (iii) often not attempted

    Q2(b) despite a technical article on it in 2009.

    Q3(c) on best practice CG report.

    Q4(d) on SR and the voluntary supplier payment policy

    December 2010

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    17/28

    Explain the importance of sound corporate governance byassessing the consequences of the corporate governancefailures at ZPT.

    Corporate governance is the system by which organisationsare controlled

    Sound corporate governance includes having a committee

    structure such as remunerations committee

    It is important to split the roles of CEO and Chairman.

    ZPT should form an audit committee

    There is no mention in the case of a nominations committeeso ZPT should set one up

    Example of Q1(c)(i)

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    18/28

    The second parts of two-task requirements (after the and)

    Questions using higher level verbs like evaluate, construct

    and assess

    Ethical reasoning tasks

    Professional marks in Q1

    Overall, things that werent donewell

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    19/28

    LESSONS

    LEARNED

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    20/28

    WHERE CANTUITION

    PROVIDERSHELP?

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    21/28

    Work through all past papers.

    Rehearse use of common P1 verbs and question types.

    Continually emphasise the necessity of properly reading each

    question and the case itself.

    Rehearse presentation of answers for professional marks inQ1.

    Study real life situations in which governance, risk and ethicsare prominent as part of placing the main themes in context.

    My thoughts after seven live P1exams

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    22/28

    FOCUS ON

    FUTURE

    EXAMS

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    23/28

    WHATS NEW?

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    24/28

    C1c on dynamic nature of risk assessment

    C1d management responses to changing risk assessment

    C1e risk appetite

    C3f on ALARP

    C3g objective and subjective risk perception

    C3h related and correlated risk

    New content on risk in studyguide section C

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    25/28

    P1, Professional Accountant

    Is now known as:

    P1, Governance, Risk

    and Ethics

    New name

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    26/28

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    27/28

    Dont question spot revise the whole study guide andexpect anything.

    Work through all previous papers.

    Concentrate on exam technique for level 2 and 3 verbs.

    Answer all tasks in a question (before and after the and)

    Read and study the case and each question before startingthe answer.

    EXAMINERS TOP TIPS

  • 8/2/2019 p1 2011conf Pres

    28/28