ED Master 1 Analyse pharmacologique d ’un effet (un son) sur la pression artérielle

  • Upload
    sybil

  • View
    23

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ED Master 1 Analyse pharmacologique d ’un effet (un son) sur la pression artérielle. Pr. Jean - Luc ELGHOZI INSERM U 652 Hôpital Necker. MAJ 02/05/06. PROBLEMATIQUE 1. Etablir qu ’un son fait varier la pression artérielle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • ED Master 1Analyse pharmacologiquedun effet (un son) surla pression artriellePr. Jean - Luc ELGHOZIINSERM U 652Hpital NeckerMAJ 02/05/06

  • PROBLEMATIQUE

    1. Etablir quun son fait varier la pression artrielle2. Pourquoi la pression artrielle varie-t-elle? Dissection pharmacologique3. Un traitement prvient-il cette rponse?4. Ces variations de pression artrielle ont-elles des rpercussions mdicales?

    EN PREAMBULE QUELQUES RAPPELS

  • Les dterminants dela pression artrielleLe dbit de la pompe cardiaque (frquence, volume ject)La rsistance du tuyau (elle varie)Le contenu = volume du sang dans le tuyau (position, respiration)

  • Le barorflexe normalPA dcharges

  • Le barorflexe normalPA dcharges

  • Mmentonerfs vagues = frein du coeur, mdiateur actylcholine, antagoniste = atropinenerfs sympathiques cardiaques = acclrateur, mdiateur noradrnaline, antagonistes = btabloquants (atnolol...)nerfs sympathiques vasculaires = vasoconstricteurs, mdiateur noradrnaline, antagoniste = alphabloquants (prazosine)

  • AUTONOMIC COMPONENTS OF THE CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSES TO AN ACOUSTIC STARTLE STIMULUS IN RATS Vronique BAUDRIE, Joke H.M. TULEN, Jocelyne BLANC and Jean-Luc ELGHOZI

  • Six rats, implanted with a BP telemetric system, were enrolled in a randomized crossover saline-controlled (saline vs autonomic blocker) study with a washout period of 7 days between each active session.A first acoustic stimulus (110 dB, 0.7 sec) was administered.An autonomic blocker i.e. atropine methylnitrate (15 mg/kg), atenolol (15 mg/kg) or prazosin (1 mg/kg), or physiological saline was administered i.p. 40 min prior to a second identical acoustic stimulus.

  • ConvertisseurPression ambiantePlaque rceptriceLogiciel de conversion du signalLogiciel d'acquisition des donnesUA10CHART

  • Heavy metal

  • SPECTRUM OF THE ACOUSTIC STIMULUSHzsecdB202002000200000.030.040.060.080.10.180.30.40.61.055565758595105115125

  • 801001201401600306090120150180210240270300mm HgSYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURETIME (sec)12345

  • Atropa BelladonaFleurBaies

  • ATROPINE 15 mg/kg i.p.SBPHRmm HgbpmTime (sec)8010012014016018001020304050604004204404604805000102030405060mm HgbpmcontrolatropinecontrolatropineAverage responses01020304001020304050

  • PRAZOSIN 1mg/kg i.p.mm HgbpmHRSBPmm HgbpmcontrolcontrolprazosinprazosinTime (sec)Average responses020406080100-20-10010203040608010012014016001020304050602402803203604004400102030405060***

  • These results indicate the BP rise resulting from an acute loud noise depends on a vascular sympathetic activation (prevented with prazosin) which is partly blunted by vasodilation (revealed with prazosin).The evoked HR changes combine a sympathetic activation (fully expressed following atropine) and a vagal activation (unmasked with atenolol).Further experiments are necessary to document the vasodilatory component unmasked with prazosin.

  • Les rponses diffrent selon les souches

  • EFFECTS OF AN AUDITORY STARTLE STIMULUS ON BLOOD PRESSURE AND HEART RATE IN NORMAL MAN

    S. Holand, A. Girard, C. Meyer-Bisch, J.L. Elghozi

    Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hpital Necker - Paris

  • Arlette et lquipement

  • 507510012515000.20.40.60.81secondsdBSTARTLE STIMULUS : 110 dB - 0.150 s

  • 0501001500.10.52.512.5dBBackground noiseSTARTLE STIMULUS AND BACKGROUND NOISEkHz

  • 20406010080120SecVolta.u.mmHga.u.a.u.BPRespi.ECGEOGEvent110 dB

  • RESPIaubpmSBPmmHgHR1601001201400102030-01020301100102030-01020307090Time (sec)102030-01020302.53.03.54.00

  • EARLY RESPONSESBP05101520DBP05101520mmHgSham95110120Sham95110120dBdBmmHgHR05101520Sham95110120dBbpm

  • SBP020406080100DBP020406080100RESPONDERS IN %95110120dB95110120dBHR02040608010095110120dB%%%

  • POPULATION 25 SUBJECTS : 18 WOMEN, 7 MEN

    AGE : 45.6 2.2 years old

    WEIGHT : 67.4 2.7 kg

    HEIGHT : 166.5 2.0 cm

    B.M.I. : 24.2 0.8 kg.m-2

    S.B.P. RANGE : 89.4 to 175.3 mmHg

    D.B.P. RANGE : 55.9 to 94.0 mmHg

    H.R. RANGE : 58.5 to 85.2 bpm

  • MAXIMAL CHANGES IN THE EARLY PHASE01020PlaceboStim 1Stim 2mmHgDBPSBP01020PlaceboStim 1Stim 2mmHg051015PlaceboStim 1Stim 2HRbpm* P
  • 020406080100120140160180200mmHgRESTING BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURED WITH FINAPRES25 SUBJECTS IN SUPINE POSITION

  • REGRESSION BETWEEN CHANGES IN SBP, DBP or HR AND CORRESPONDING RESTING LEVELSmmHg

  • La question: lacclration cardiaque lve-t-elle la pression?PA = DC X RP

  • DC = FC * VESFC et VES peuvent se contrarier Exemple de la stimulation sonore

  • PompeTuyauPA = DC X RP

  • Wesseling et al. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:2566-73.Finger Blood PressureAortic Flow

  • Variations hmodynamiques rsultantdune stimulation sonore-20-1001020%PAMFCVESDCRPPlaceboStimulation 1Stimulation 2********DC = FC * VESPA = DC * RP

  • 10 sujets hypertendus sans traitement

    10 sujets traits par le losartan (50 mg/jour)

    10 sujets traits par latnolol (100 mg/jour)

    5 sujets traits par la prazosine (10 mg/jour)Antihypertensive monotherapy and cardiovascular responses to an acoustic startle stimulusGirard et al. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2001; 37:101-107

  • 60801001201401601800102030102030708090100110120CONTROL110 dB, 150 ms6080100120140160180010203010203030405060708090100Time (sec) SBP(mmHg) SBP(mmHg) HR(bpm) HR(bpm)BETABLOCKER

  • 60801001201401601800102030102030708090100110120CONTROL110 dB, 150 msTime (sec) SBP(mmHg) SBP(mmHg) HR(bpm) HR(bpm)60801001201401601800102030102030708090100110120ALPHABLOCKER

  • 0**2040**02040Non traitsLosartanAtenololPrazosine051015

  • VESDCRP-20***-10010203040%Non traitsLosartanAtenololPrazosine

  • Travaux de lquipe sur le sonBaudrie V., Tulen J.H.M., Blanc J., Elghozi J.L.: Autonomic components of the cardiovascular responses to an acoustic startle stimulus in rats. J. Auton. Pharmacol. 17: 303-309, 1997.Blanc J., Baudrie V., Tulen J., Ponchon P., Gaudet E., Elghozi J.L.: Social isolation affects the pattern of cardiovascular responses to repetitive acoustic startle stimuli. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 24: 40-45, 1997.Holand S., Girard A., Meyer-Bisch C., Elghozi J.L.: Rponses cardio-vasculaires une alerte sonore chez lhomme Arch. Mal. Cur 1999; 92:1127-1131.Holand S., Girard A., Laude D., Meyer-Bisch C., Elghozi J.L.: Effects of an auditory startle stimulus on blood pressure and heart rate in man J. Hypertension 1999, 17:1893-1897.Baudrie V., Laude D., Chaouloff F., Elghozi J.L.: Genetic influences on cardiovascular responses to an acoustic startle stimulus in rats Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2001, 28:1096-1099.Girard A., Holand S., Laude D., Elghozi J.L.: Antihypertensive monotherapy and cardiovascular responses to an acoustic startle stimulus J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2001;37: 101-107.Blanc J., Lacolley P., Laurent S., Elghozi J.L.: Comparison of angiotensin II-, and acoustic startle stimulus-induced blood pressure changes in Fischer 344 and Wistar Kyoto rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2004, 31:466-473.

  • The end

    3530