L'Ancien d'Algérie, May 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011

    1/4

    AFM Nanodissection Reveals InternalStructural Details of Single CollagenFibrils

    Chuck K. Wen and M. Cynthia Goh*

    Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3H6

    Received August 20, 2003; Revised Manuscript Received November 7, 2003

    ABSTRACT

    We utilize the atomic force microscope (AFM) to perform a careful nanodissection procedure on a single collagen fibril. By precisely incising

    the fibril and then peeling away exterior layers, its internal structure was successfully exposed for direct visualization. This methodology has

    the advantage of avoiding unnecessary rough contact with the specific area being examined as well as high lateral frictional forces, both of

    which can hinder attempts to dissect delicate biological specimens with the AFM.

    Applying the atomic force microscope (AFM) toward studies

    in the realm of the biological sciences has been an exciting

    and fast-growing trend over the past decade. Boasting sub-

    nanometer resolutions, the ability to operate in solution, and

    only minimal sample preparation prerequisites compared to

    other microscopy techniques, it is easy to understand why it

    has become the popular visualization tool that it presently

    is. Since its discovery only seventeen years ago,1 its efficacy

    for the imaging of various biological systems is already well

    established and documented.2

    The contribution of AFM though, is not restricted to the

    typical domain of other microscopy methods: That is, the

    AFM is more than simply an aid for the eye. Recall, an AFM

    picture is generated by monitoring the reaction of a flexible

    cantilever tip as it is precisely raster scanned over a sample

    surface by a computer-controlled piezo-crystal. Effectively,

    the microscope is feeling the sample (rather than seeing it)

    during the imaging process; topographical maps are readily

    constructed from this. Therefore, the AFMs instrumentation

    can essentially use an extremely sharp stylus to exactly feel

    or touch a sample with sub-nanometer precision; this ability

    affords unique opportunities outside the function of visual-

    ization alone.This ability of the AFM to precisely touch the nanoworld

    has opened a vast storehouse of exciting new possibilities

    for the biological scientist. Among other striking examples,3

    single proteins have been individually stretched and un-

    folded,4 antibody-antigen bonds physically disrupted,5 pro-

    tein conformations physically modulated,6 and individual

    DNA molecules7 intentionally sliced. The AFM has allowed

    researchers to manipulate and literally play with the miniature

    world of molecular biology in a manner previously only

    dreamed of. In this paper, we present work that sought to

    take hold of this opportunity.

    Herein, an account describing how we carefully dissected

    a single biological fibril is presented. Using careful manipu-

    lations, the exterior layers of a specific segment on the fibril

    were initially cut and then peeled away. This dissection

    technique exposed the fibrils previously hidden internal

    anatomy, and thus made it available for direct visualization

    for the first time. The observations afforded by this allowed

    new data concerning the structures internal organization to

    be gained.

    The biological fibril chosen to be dissected is known as a

    fibrous long spacing (FLS) type collagen fibril. This choice

    was made due to our groups ongoing interest in the topic

    of collagen structure. Previously, we have utilized the AFM

    to produce topographical maps of FLS-type fibrils in order

    to elucidate their ultrastructure.8 Though this former work

    was fruitful for discerning the surface features of these fibrils,

    questions about its interior architecture remained unad-

    dressed. How this unique dissection procedure was performed

    is now presented.As alluded to earlier, an incision into the exterior layers

    of a collagen fibril was initially made. This was produced

    by making a linear set of closely distanced indentations along

    the fibrils surface. Each indentation was independently made

    by pressing down the cantilever tip into the fibril surface at

    a specified coordinate with the same predefined depth.

    Together, this can effectively produce a single cut that

    partially severs the fibril through this stitching-like action.

    Figure 1 depicts the fibril prior to the cut, while Figure 2

    depicts it after the cut.* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-416-978-6254; fax: +1-416-978-4526.

    E-mail: [email protected].

    NANO

    LETTERS

    2004Vol. 4, No. 1

    129-132

    10.1021/nl034685n CCC: $27.50 2004 American Chemical SocietyPublished on Web 11/20/2003

  • 8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011

    2/4

    This stitching-like indentation method is useful for the

    production of cuts into particular specimens in a readily

    controllable manner. Though the depicted incision is 140

    nm deep, the depth of the slice can be readily varied by

    simply changing the predefined depth to which the tip is

    pressed into the fibril at each indentation point. For example,

    when a relatively shallower tip-penetration depth is chosen

    (which corresponds to a lower indentation force), a shallower

    cut is made into the fibril. This is exemplified by the 1-2

    nm deep perforated cut demarcated by the white line, and

    the corresponding inset close-up, in Figure 2.

    Following the production of this cut though, we then

    desired to peel away the scored exterior layers of the fibril

    in order to expose its interior domains. This was performed

    by applying a compressing force on a nearby area of the

    fibril. The force was applied by repeatedly squeezing down

    on the fibril with the tip over a segment that was axially

    removed from the original line of incise. By doing so, we

    can see that the cut outer layers of the fibril became pulledtoward the segment that was compressed, and away from

    the original line of cutting. A well-defined area that allowed

    the interior structure of the fibril to be directly imaged in

    the context of the larger form was produced (see box 1 in

    Figure 3 and Figure 4). Thus we can see that, with proper

    technique, AFM nanodissection can lead to internal structural

    information of individual fibrils, not limited to the surface

    level only.

    In applying this compressing force, we envision that the

    cut layers were peeled away in the following manner: The

    force would be expected to produce a tensile stress axially

    directed toward the point of squeezing and unevenly felt in

    the cross-section of the fibril (Figure 5). This stress would

    be most strongly experienced in the fibrils radial outermost

    layers. As these exterior layers are then deformed during

    the compression, one would expect these previously scored

    outer layers to be pulled toward the point of squeezing and

    away from the original line of incise during this process.

    Though the compressed segment of the fibril is sacrificed

    in this process (see area 2 in Figure 3A), this method has

    the significant advantage of doing no damage to the area of

    interest (see area 1 in Figure 3A). The now-exposed interior

    domain is distinct and readily visualized. It is not excessively

    Figure 1. 3D height image plot of a FLS-type collagen fibril witha diameter of210 nm prior to cutting. The characteristic 270nm periodic cross-striated pattern is evident. Scale bar represents1 m in the x-y plane.

    Figure 2. The depicted incision, marked by the dotted line (1), is140 nm deep into the fibril. Making a set of successiveindentations into the fibril produced the cut. Changing the forceby which the indentations are made controls their depth. This isillustrated in the boxed area marked (2). The inset shows a 2magnification of this area; lower indentation forces resulted inshallow penetrations (of 1-2 nm deep only). The scale barrepresents 1 m in the x-y plane. This is a 3D height image plotof the same fibril depicted in Figure 1. The inset is a deflectionmode image.

    Figure 3. A deflection mode image of the same fibril in Figures

    1 and 2 after compression. Area (1) marks the well-defined openedsegment of the fibril; area (2) marks the location where compressiontook place. The scale bar represents 1 m.

    Figure 4. A 3D height image plot of the dissected area is presented.A hierarchical macromolecular architecture is observed, consistingof parallel-aligned fibrillar subcomponents that respectively maintainthe characteristic FLS cross-striation pattern; the banding of eachfibrillar subcomponent lies in register with that of its neighbors.The scale bar represents 500 nm.

    130 Nano Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004

  • 8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011

    3/4

    complicated by the damage done to the nearby surrounding

    areas, nor is it obscured by any damage that may have been

    directly incurred during the nanomanipulation process. The

    fact that no tip-sample contact is ever directly made in the

    dissected area of specific interest may be especially advanta-

    geous for delicate biological specimens that may otherwise

    be readily deformed due to such immediate contact by the

    typically much-harder cantilever tip. For example, the

    methodology we have described may be useful for the

    dissection of specimens such as individual biological cells:

    Selected local regions of a cell may be carefully and gently

    opened up to a specific depth, to reveal its underlying and

    internal anatomy at that targeted space.The method we have herein outlined differs from the

    techniques previously employed. Typically, AFM nanodis-

    section has been performed by repetitively running the

    cantilever tip against the particular specimen of interest, with

    high loading forces in a contact-mode-like fashion. Such an

    action effectively produces a scraping effect that can do

    damage to the sample, and then sweep away those damaged

    or frayed portions. This has been exemplified in work such

    as that done by Thalhammer et al. where the AFM tip was

    used to scrape off a particular section on an isolated human

    chromosome.9

    This scraping technique, however, did not prove fruitful

    in our nanodissection attempts of FLS-type fibrils. In those

    attempts, overly excessive damage to the fibril was often

    observed. Significant distortion of the fibril was often seen,

    even in areas that were axially removed from the local

    segment of scraping. This is illustrated in Figure 6. Such

    effects confounded our attempts to produce a well-defined

    dissected area that could serve as a window into the fibrils

    interior structure.

    This more typical nanodissection technique may have

    failed us in our work due to the high frictional forces that

    are incurred during the process. These forces are likely the

    reason for the heavily distorted and pulled appearance of

    the fibril after scraping (as demarcated by the arrow in Figure

    5B); they deform the scraped structures too much. Unfor-

    tunately, though, these frictional forces are unavoidable; they

    are a byproduct of the high loading forces that are necessary

    if the cantilever tip is to get into the tough exterior of these

    dried biological fibrils via a scraping motion. As an analogy,

    we envision this difficulty to be likened to that experienced

    by a person who desires to make a precise and defined cut

    utilizing a dull blade: considerable lateral forces are exerted

    on the particular object being sliced due to such a motion,

    which can undesirably warp and twist it away from its

    original form.

    In the technique we have described in this letter, suchfrictional forces are minimized. Recall, all nanomanipulation

    procedures utilized here move the tip in an up-and-down

    fashion, as opposed to a side-to-side one. In making the

    original incision, a stitching-like motion is used to make the

    cut, and in the pulling away of the scored outer layers of

    the fibril a compressing motion is utilized. As has been

    demonstrated, such movements are readily controllable, and

    they avoid the production of undesirable frictional forces that

    may lead to excessive and uncontrolled damage to the

    specimen.

    In the context of our own studies on collagen fibril

    structure, this technique of AFM nanodissection has afforded

    unique and useful empirical results. For noncrystallizing

    fibrous proteins such as this, there are relatively few

    experimental techniques that are suitable for the study of

    such supramolecular structure. Previous studies of FLS-type

    fibril structure have been confined to the techniques of

    electron microscopy10 (EM) or traditional AFM visualiza-

    tion.8 In that work, observations are typically focused on the

    fibrils surface or ultrastructure only. However, by utilizing

    the unique opportunities the AFM has afforded us as an

    investigative nanodissection tool, we have managed to

    produce three-dimensional topographical maps into the FLS-

    Figure 5. (A) Depicts the tip moving downward toward a fibril.(B) Depicts the lines of tensile stress that would be expected to beinduced in the fibril during compression by the cantilever tip.

    Figure 6. Deflection mode images of FLS type collagen fibrilbefore (A) and after (B) scraping with the AFM probe. The box in(A) represents the area of scraping. Extensive damage is done tothe fibril construct. The arrow in (B) points to an area of the fibrilthat appears to have been pulled away from its original arrangementduring the scraping process. The scale bar represents 1 m.

    Nano Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004 131

  • 8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011

    4/4

    type fibrils core when a suitable methodology is utilized.

    These new results well supplement and very much add to

    the past observations obtained using those other techniques.

    Though this investigative nanodissection procedure was

    demonstrated on an FLS-type fibril specifically, we envision

    this procedure to be general in its potential applicability.

    There does not appear to be anything particularly specific

    or unique for the case of this FLS-type fibril that makes it

    any more suitable as a subject for nanodissection than another

    potential specimen. Even with respect to the working size-scale, the procedure we have presented would be expected

    to be readily scalable. However, as is typical for other AFM

    functions, we acknowledge that we would expect a generally

    increasing level of difficulty when working with progres-

    sively smaller size scales.

    In this letter, a general nanodissection technique has been

    described on an isolated FLS-type collagen fibril. This

    procedure has demonstrated its unique investigative utility

    for the elucidation of the structures internal anatomy and

    organization. By utilizing the unique nanomanipulation

    capabilities of the AFM, novel insights that other techniques

    would be hard pressed to obtain have been made on this

    system. As our techniques and abilities with the AFM aredeveloped and refined, we are excited about the new potential

    such work may hold for our ability to reach out and directly

    interact with these very small systems that are operative at

    diminutive size scales.

    In this work, dried FLS-type collagen fibril samples were

    prepared as previously described.11 Briefly, an acidified 1

    mg/mL Type I collagen (99% purity, Sigma, St. Louis,

    MO) monomer solution was dialyzed against a water bath

    of milli-Q deionized water at 21 C overnight; after which,

    a 10 L aliquot sample was removed, diluted 10-fold with

    milli-Q deionized water, and then deposited on a freshly

    cleaved piece of mica surface where it was allowed to dry

    under ambient conditions. All AFM work was performed

    on a Nanoscope III multi-mode instrument (Digital Instru-

    ments, Santa Barbara, CA). Images were captured in contact-

    mode operation under ambient conditions and using square

    pyramidal silicon nitride cantilevers with nominal spring

    constants of 0.12 N/m (Digital Instruments). All nanodis-

    section procedures, cutting and compressing, were performed

    under ambient conditions using ultrasharp silicon cantilevers

    (Silicon-MDT, Moscow, Russia) with nominal spring con-

    stants of 14 N/m, and applied forces, roughly on the order

    of 1.4-2.8 N, were used. The nanodissection procedure

    was performed using the force-volume mode functions of

    the Nanoscope III software, version 4.43r8 (Digital Instru-

    ments). Fibril relocation, which allowed successive nanoma-

    nipulation and imaging to be performed on the same single

    fibril, was enabled by using an indexed TEM grid underneath

    the mica substrate.12

    Acknowledgment. We acknowledge the support of

    NSERC and the Materials and Manufacturing Ontario

    Emerging Materials Knowledge fund. We thank Dr. Rich

    McAloney for helpful AFM advice. C.K.W. thanks NSERC

    for a PGSA fellowship.

    References

    (1) Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; Gerber, C. Atomic Force Microscope. Phys.ReV. Lett. 1986, 56, 930-933.

    (2) Czajkowsky, D. M.; Iwamoto, H.; Shao, Z. F. Atomic forcemicroscopy in structural biology: From the subcellular to thesubmolecular. J. Electron Microsc. 2000, 49(3), 395-406.

    (3) Fotiadis, D.; Scheuring, S.; Muller, S. A.; Engel, A.; Muller, D. J.Imaging and manipulation of biological structures with the AFM.

    Micron 2002, 33, 385-397.(4) Rief, M.; Gautel, M.; Oesterhelt, F.; Fernandez, J. M.; Gaub, H. E.

    Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains byAFM. Science 1997, 276, 1109-1112. Fisher, T. E.; Marszalek, P.E.; Fernandez, J. M. Stretching single molecules into novel confor-mations using the atomic force microscope. Nature Struct. Biol. 2000,

    7(9), 719-724.(5) Mul ler, D. J.; Schoenenberger, C. A.; Buldt, G.; Engel, A. Immuno-

    atomic force microscopy of purple membrane. Biophys. J. 1996, 70,1796-1802.

    (6) Muller, D. J.; Buldt, G.; Engel, A. Force-induced conformationalchange of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 249, 239-243.

    (7) Hansma, H. G.; Vesenka, J.; Siegerist, C.; Kelderman, G.; Morrett,H.; Sinsheimer, R. L.; Elings, V.; Bustamante, C.; Hansma, P. K.Reproducible imaging and dissection of plasmid DNA under liquidwith the atomic force microscope. Science 1992, 256, 1180-1184.Henderson, E. Imaging and nanodissection of individual supercoiledplasmids by atomic force microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20,445-447.

    (8) Paige, M. F.; Rainey, J. K.; Goh, M. C. Fibrous Long SpacingCollagen Ultrastructure Elucidated by Atomic Force Microscopy.

    Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 3211-3216. Paige, M. F.; Rainey, J. K.; Goh,M. C. A study of fibrous long spacing collagen ultrastructure and

    assembly by atomic force microscopy. Micron 2001, 32, 341-353.(9) Thalhammer, S.; Stark, R. W.; Muller, S.; Wienberg, J.; Heckl, W.

    M. The atomic force microscope as a new microdissecting tool forthe generation of genetic probes. J. Struct. Biol. 1997, 119, 232-237.

    (10) Doyle, B. B.; Hukins, D. W. L.; Hulmes, D. J. S.; Miller, A.;Woodhead-Galloway, J. Collagen Polymorphism: Its Origins in theAmino Acid Sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 1975, 91, 79-99. Chapman, J.A.; Armitage, P. M. An analysis of Fibrous Long Spacing Forms ofCollagen. ConnectiVe Tissue Res. 1972, 1, 31-37.

    (11) Rainey, J. K.; Wen, C. K.; Goh, M. C. Hierarchical assembly andthe onset of banding in fibrous long spacing collagen revealed byatomic force microscopy. Matrix Biol. 2002, 21, 647-660.

    (12) Markiewicz, P.; Goh, M. C. Identifying locations on a substrate forthe repeated positioning of AFM samples. Ultramicroscopy 1997,68, 215-221.

    NL034685N

    132 Nano Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004