Upload
emediage
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011
1/4
AFM Nanodissection Reveals InternalStructural Details of Single CollagenFibrils
Chuck K. Wen and M. Cynthia Goh*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3H6
Received August 20, 2003; Revised Manuscript Received November 7, 2003
ABSTRACT
We utilize the atomic force microscope (AFM) to perform a careful nanodissection procedure on a single collagen fibril. By precisely incising
the fibril and then peeling away exterior layers, its internal structure was successfully exposed for direct visualization. This methodology has
the advantage of avoiding unnecessary rough contact with the specific area being examined as well as high lateral frictional forces, both of
which can hinder attempts to dissect delicate biological specimens with the AFM.
Applying the atomic force microscope (AFM) toward studies
in the realm of the biological sciences has been an exciting
and fast-growing trend over the past decade. Boasting sub-
nanometer resolutions, the ability to operate in solution, and
only minimal sample preparation prerequisites compared to
other microscopy techniques, it is easy to understand why it
has become the popular visualization tool that it presently
is. Since its discovery only seventeen years ago,1 its efficacy
for the imaging of various biological systems is already well
established and documented.2
The contribution of AFM though, is not restricted to the
typical domain of other microscopy methods: That is, the
AFM is more than simply an aid for the eye. Recall, an AFM
picture is generated by monitoring the reaction of a flexible
cantilever tip as it is precisely raster scanned over a sample
surface by a computer-controlled piezo-crystal. Effectively,
the microscope is feeling the sample (rather than seeing it)
during the imaging process; topographical maps are readily
constructed from this. Therefore, the AFMs instrumentation
can essentially use an extremely sharp stylus to exactly feel
or touch a sample with sub-nanometer precision; this ability
affords unique opportunities outside the function of visual-
ization alone.This ability of the AFM to precisely touch the nanoworld
has opened a vast storehouse of exciting new possibilities
for the biological scientist. Among other striking examples,3
single proteins have been individually stretched and un-
folded,4 antibody-antigen bonds physically disrupted,5 pro-
tein conformations physically modulated,6 and individual
DNA molecules7 intentionally sliced. The AFM has allowed
researchers to manipulate and literally play with the miniature
world of molecular biology in a manner previously only
dreamed of. In this paper, we present work that sought to
take hold of this opportunity.
Herein, an account describing how we carefully dissected
a single biological fibril is presented. Using careful manipu-
lations, the exterior layers of a specific segment on the fibril
were initially cut and then peeled away. This dissection
technique exposed the fibrils previously hidden internal
anatomy, and thus made it available for direct visualization
for the first time. The observations afforded by this allowed
new data concerning the structures internal organization to
be gained.
The biological fibril chosen to be dissected is known as a
fibrous long spacing (FLS) type collagen fibril. This choice
was made due to our groups ongoing interest in the topic
of collagen structure. Previously, we have utilized the AFM
to produce topographical maps of FLS-type fibrils in order
to elucidate their ultrastructure.8 Though this former work
was fruitful for discerning the surface features of these fibrils,
questions about its interior architecture remained unad-
dressed. How this unique dissection procedure was performed
is now presented.As alluded to earlier, an incision into the exterior layers
of a collagen fibril was initially made. This was produced
by making a linear set of closely distanced indentations along
the fibrils surface. Each indentation was independently made
by pressing down the cantilever tip into the fibril surface at
a specified coordinate with the same predefined depth.
Together, this can effectively produce a single cut that
partially severs the fibril through this stitching-like action.
Figure 1 depicts the fibril prior to the cut, while Figure 2
depicts it after the cut.* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-416-978-6254; fax: +1-416-978-4526.
E-mail: [email protected].
NANO
LETTERS
2004Vol. 4, No. 1
129-132
10.1021/nl034685n CCC: $27.50 2004 American Chemical SocietyPublished on Web 11/20/2003
8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011
2/4
This stitching-like indentation method is useful for the
production of cuts into particular specimens in a readily
controllable manner. Though the depicted incision is 140
nm deep, the depth of the slice can be readily varied by
simply changing the predefined depth to which the tip is
pressed into the fibril at each indentation point. For example,
when a relatively shallower tip-penetration depth is chosen
(which corresponds to a lower indentation force), a shallower
cut is made into the fibril. This is exemplified by the 1-2
nm deep perforated cut demarcated by the white line, and
the corresponding inset close-up, in Figure 2.
Following the production of this cut though, we then
desired to peel away the scored exterior layers of the fibril
in order to expose its interior domains. This was performed
by applying a compressing force on a nearby area of the
fibril. The force was applied by repeatedly squeezing down
on the fibril with the tip over a segment that was axially
removed from the original line of incise. By doing so, we
can see that the cut outer layers of the fibril became pulledtoward the segment that was compressed, and away from
the original line of cutting. A well-defined area that allowed
the interior structure of the fibril to be directly imaged in
the context of the larger form was produced (see box 1 in
Figure 3 and Figure 4). Thus we can see that, with proper
technique, AFM nanodissection can lead to internal structural
information of individual fibrils, not limited to the surface
level only.
In applying this compressing force, we envision that the
cut layers were peeled away in the following manner: The
force would be expected to produce a tensile stress axially
directed toward the point of squeezing and unevenly felt in
the cross-section of the fibril (Figure 5). This stress would
be most strongly experienced in the fibrils radial outermost
layers. As these exterior layers are then deformed during
the compression, one would expect these previously scored
outer layers to be pulled toward the point of squeezing and
away from the original line of incise during this process.
Though the compressed segment of the fibril is sacrificed
in this process (see area 2 in Figure 3A), this method has
the significant advantage of doing no damage to the area of
interest (see area 1 in Figure 3A). The now-exposed interior
domain is distinct and readily visualized. It is not excessively
Figure 1. 3D height image plot of a FLS-type collagen fibril witha diameter of210 nm prior to cutting. The characteristic 270nm periodic cross-striated pattern is evident. Scale bar represents1 m in the x-y plane.
Figure 2. The depicted incision, marked by the dotted line (1), is140 nm deep into the fibril. Making a set of successiveindentations into the fibril produced the cut. Changing the forceby which the indentations are made controls their depth. This isillustrated in the boxed area marked (2). The inset shows a 2magnification of this area; lower indentation forces resulted inshallow penetrations (of 1-2 nm deep only). The scale barrepresents 1 m in the x-y plane. This is a 3D height image plotof the same fibril depicted in Figure 1. The inset is a deflectionmode image.
Figure 3. A deflection mode image of the same fibril in Figures
1 and 2 after compression. Area (1) marks the well-defined openedsegment of the fibril; area (2) marks the location where compressiontook place. The scale bar represents 1 m.
Figure 4. A 3D height image plot of the dissected area is presented.A hierarchical macromolecular architecture is observed, consistingof parallel-aligned fibrillar subcomponents that respectively maintainthe characteristic FLS cross-striation pattern; the banding of eachfibrillar subcomponent lies in register with that of its neighbors.The scale bar represents 500 nm.
130 Nano Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004
8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011
3/4
complicated by the damage done to the nearby surrounding
areas, nor is it obscured by any damage that may have been
directly incurred during the nanomanipulation process. The
fact that no tip-sample contact is ever directly made in the
dissected area of specific interest may be especially advanta-
geous for delicate biological specimens that may otherwise
be readily deformed due to such immediate contact by the
typically much-harder cantilever tip. For example, the
methodology we have described may be useful for the
dissection of specimens such as individual biological cells:
Selected local regions of a cell may be carefully and gently
opened up to a specific depth, to reveal its underlying and
internal anatomy at that targeted space.The method we have herein outlined differs from the
techniques previously employed. Typically, AFM nanodis-
section has been performed by repetitively running the
cantilever tip against the particular specimen of interest, with
high loading forces in a contact-mode-like fashion. Such an
action effectively produces a scraping effect that can do
damage to the sample, and then sweep away those damaged
or frayed portions. This has been exemplified in work such
as that done by Thalhammer et al. where the AFM tip was
used to scrape off a particular section on an isolated human
chromosome.9
This scraping technique, however, did not prove fruitful
in our nanodissection attempts of FLS-type fibrils. In those
attempts, overly excessive damage to the fibril was often
observed. Significant distortion of the fibril was often seen,
even in areas that were axially removed from the local
segment of scraping. This is illustrated in Figure 6. Such
effects confounded our attempts to produce a well-defined
dissected area that could serve as a window into the fibrils
interior structure.
This more typical nanodissection technique may have
failed us in our work due to the high frictional forces that
are incurred during the process. These forces are likely the
reason for the heavily distorted and pulled appearance of
the fibril after scraping (as demarcated by the arrow in Figure
5B); they deform the scraped structures too much. Unfor-
tunately, though, these frictional forces are unavoidable; they
are a byproduct of the high loading forces that are necessary
if the cantilever tip is to get into the tough exterior of these
dried biological fibrils via a scraping motion. As an analogy,
we envision this difficulty to be likened to that experienced
by a person who desires to make a precise and defined cut
utilizing a dull blade: considerable lateral forces are exerted
on the particular object being sliced due to such a motion,
which can undesirably warp and twist it away from its
original form.
In the technique we have described in this letter, suchfrictional forces are minimized. Recall, all nanomanipulation
procedures utilized here move the tip in an up-and-down
fashion, as opposed to a side-to-side one. In making the
original incision, a stitching-like motion is used to make the
cut, and in the pulling away of the scored outer layers of
the fibril a compressing motion is utilized. As has been
demonstrated, such movements are readily controllable, and
they avoid the production of undesirable frictional forces that
may lead to excessive and uncontrolled damage to the
specimen.
In the context of our own studies on collagen fibril
structure, this technique of AFM nanodissection has afforded
unique and useful empirical results. For noncrystallizing
fibrous proteins such as this, there are relatively few
experimental techniques that are suitable for the study of
such supramolecular structure. Previous studies of FLS-type
fibril structure have been confined to the techniques of
electron microscopy10 (EM) or traditional AFM visualiza-
tion.8 In that work, observations are typically focused on the
fibrils surface or ultrastructure only. However, by utilizing
the unique opportunities the AFM has afforded us as an
investigative nanodissection tool, we have managed to
produce three-dimensional topographical maps into the FLS-
Figure 5. (A) Depicts the tip moving downward toward a fibril.(B) Depicts the lines of tensile stress that would be expected to beinduced in the fibril during compression by the cantilever tip.
Figure 6. Deflection mode images of FLS type collagen fibrilbefore (A) and after (B) scraping with the AFM probe. The box in(A) represents the area of scraping. Extensive damage is done tothe fibril construct. The arrow in (B) points to an area of the fibrilthat appears to have been pulled away from its original arrangementduring the scraping process. The scale bar represents 1 m.
Nano Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004 131
8/3/2019 L'Ancien d'Algrie, May 2011
4/4
type fibrils core when a suitable methodology is utilized.
These new results well supplement and very much add to
the past observations obtained using those other techniques.
Though this investigative nanodissection procedure was
demonstrated on an FLS-type fibril specifically, we envision
this procedure to be general in its potential applicability.
There does not appear to be anything particularly specific
or unique for the case of this FLS-type fibril that makes it
any more suitable as a subject for nanodissection than another
potential specimen. Even with respect to the working size-scale, the procedure we have presented would be expected
to be readily scalable. However, as is typical for other AFM
functions, we acknowledge that we would expect a generally
increasing level of difficulty when working with progres-
sively smaller size scales.
In this letter, a general nanodissection technique has been
described on an isolated FLS-type collagen fibril. This
procedure has demonstrated its unique investigative utility
for the elucidation of the structures internal anatomy and
organization. By utilizing the unique nanomanipulation
capabilities of the AFM, novel insights that other techniques
would be hard pressed to obtain have been made on this
system. As our techniques and abilities with the AFM aredeveloped and refined, we are excited about the new potential
such work may hold for our ability to reach out and directly
interact with these very small systems that are operative at
diminutive size scales.
In this work, dried FLS-type collagen fibril samples were
prepared as previously described.11 Briefly, an acidified 1
mg/mL Type I collagen (99% purity, Sigma, St. Louis,
MO) monomer solution was dialyzed against a water bath
of milli-Q deionized water at 21 C overnight; after which,
a 10 L aliquot sample was removed, diluted 10-fold with
milli-Q deionized water, and then deposited on a freshly
cleaved piece of mica surface where it was allowed to dry
under ambient conditions. All AFM work was performed
on a Nanoscope III multi-mode instrument (Digital Instru-
ments, Santa Barbara, CA). Images were captured in contact-
mode operation under ambient conditions and using square
pyramidal silicon nitride cantilevers with nominal spring
constants of 0.12 N/m (Digital Instruments). All nanodis-
section procedures, cutting and compressing, were performed
under ambient conditions using ultrasharp silicon cantilevers
(Silicon-MDT, Moscow, Russia) with nominal spring con-
stants of 14 N/m, and applied forces, roughly on the order
of 1.4-2.8 N, were used. The nanodissection procedure
was performed using the force-volume mode functions of
the Nanoscope III software, version 4.43r8 (Digital Instru-
ments). Fibril relocation, which allowed successive nanoma-
nipulation and imaging to be performed on the same single
fibril, was enabled by using an indexed TEM grid underneath
the mica substrate.12
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge the support of
NSERC and the Materials and Manufacturing Ontario
Emerging Materials Knowledge fund. We thank Dr. Rich
McAloney for helpful AFM advice. C.K.W. thanks NSERC
for a PGSA fellowship.
References
(1) Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; Gerber, C. Atomic Force Microscope. Phys.ReV. Lett. 1986, 56, 930-933.
(2) Czajkowsky, D. M.; Iwamoto, H.; Shao, Z. F. Atomic forcemicroscopy in structural biology: From the subcellular to thesubmolecular. J. Electron Microsc. 2000, 49(3), 395-406.
(3) Fotiadis, D.; Scheuring, S.; Muller, S. A.; Engel, A.; Muller, D. J.Imaging and manipulation of biological structures with the AFM.
Micron 2002, 33, 385-397.(4) Rief, M.; Gautel, M.; Oesterhelt, F.; Fernandez, J. M.; Gaub, H. E.
Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains byAFM. Science 1997, 276, 1109-1112. Fisher, T. E.; Marszalek, P.E.; Fernandez, J. M. Stretching single molecules into novel confor-mations using the atomic force microscope. Nature Struct. Biol. 2000,
7(9), 719-724.(5) Mul ler, D. J.; Schoenenberger, C. A.; Buldt, G.; Engel, A. Immuno-
atomic force microscopy of purple membrane. Biophys. J. 1996, 70,1796-1802.
(6) Muller, D. J.; Buldt, G.; Engel, A. Force-induced conformationalchange of bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 249, 239-243.
(7) Hansma, H. G.; Vesenka, J.; Siegerist, C.; Kelderman, G.; Morrett,H.; Sinsheimer, R. L.; Elings, V.; Bustamante, C.; Hansma, P. K.Reproducible imaging and dissection of plasmid DNA under liquidwith the atomic force microscope. Science 1992, 256, 1180-1184.Henderson, E. Imaging and nanodissection of individual supercoiledplasmids by atomic force microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20,445-447.
(8) Paige, M. F.; Rainey, J. K.; Goh, M. C. Fibrous Long SpacingCollagen Ultrastructure Elucidated by Atomic Force Microscopy.
Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 3211-3216. Paige, M. F.; Rainey, J. K.; Goh,M. C. A study of fibrous long spacing collagen ultrastructure and
assembly by atomic force microscopy. Micron 2001, 32, 341-353.(9) Thalhammer, S.; Stark, R. W.; Muller, S.; Wienberg, J.; Heckl, W.
M. The atomic force microscope as a new microdissecting tool forthe generation of genetic probes. J. Struct. Biol. 1997, 119, 232-237.
(10) Doyle, B. B.; Hukins, D. W. L.; Hulmes, D. J. S.; Miller, A.;Woodhead-Galloway, J. Collagen Polymorphism: Its Origins in theAmino Acid Sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 1975, 91, 79-99. Chapman, J.A.; Armitage, P. M. An analysis of Fibrous Long Spacing Forms ofCollagen. ConnectiVe Tissue Res. 1972, 1, 31-37.
(11) Rainey, J. K.; Wen, C. K.; Goh, M. C. Hierarchical assembly andthe onset of banding in fibrous long spacing collagen revealed byatomic force microscopy. Matrix Biol. 2002, 21, 647-660.
(12) Markiewicz, P.; Goh, M. C. Identifying locations on a substrate forthe repeated positioning of AFM samples. Ultramicroscopy 1997,68, 215-221.
NL034685N
132 Nano Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004